Skip to content

New Generation Enlite Accuracy Study

Accuracy and Performance Evaluation of the Medtronic New Generation Enlite Glucose Sensor in Conjunction With the Medtronic 640G System Components - in Clinic and at Home

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02423798
Enrollment
24
Registered
2015-04-22
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2018-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Keywords

Diabetes, Glucose sensor, Sensor accuracy and performance, CGM

Brief summary

The trial will investigate the accuracy and performance of a new sensor for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), the (new generation) Enlite, CE-marked in 2013, in conjunction with the new Medtronic 640G system components. To evaluate the accuracy and performance of the new generation Enlite sensor. This is a postmarket, interventional, open-label, non-randomized, single center clinical research trial. The trial will adopt a prospective single-sample design using the Yellow Spring Instruments (YSI) plasma glucose reference sampling procedure in the clinic and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) plasma glucose reference sampling procedure at home.

Detailed description

The trial will investigate the accuracy and performance (i.e. the life-time) of a new sensor for CGM, the (new generation) Enlite glucose sensor, CE-marked in 2013, in conjunction with the new Medtronic 640G system components. Accuracy and life-time of the sensor are important parameters contributing to the safety of patients and patient acceptance of this still fairly new technology. The current trial investigates the accuracy of the new sensor in conjunction with the new 640G system components both in the clinic and at home. This enables us to assess the sensor accuracy in a well-controlled environment using a highly accurate laboratory glucose analyzer as reference as well as sensor accuracy during real-life conditions using a blood glucose meter as reference analyzer. The data gathered in this trial will help to understand the effect of technological advancements made and can guide future development of glucose sensor for continuous glucose monitoring.

Interventions

DEVICEGlucose sensor (Enlite)

This is a postmarket, interventional, open-label, non-randomized, single center clinical research trial. The trial will adopt a prospective single-sample design using the Yellow Spring Instruments (YSI) plasma glucose reference sampling procedure in the clinic and selfmonitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) plasma glucose reference sampling procedure at home. The trial will consist of 6 visits to the investigational site: a visit for informed consent procedures (Visit 0), a screening visit (Visit 1), 3 study visits (Visit 2-4) and a final examination (Visit 5).

Sponsors

Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic Diabetes
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has signed the informed consent form prior to screening * Age 18-74 years (both inclusive) * Subject has been diagnosed with T1DM * Subject is current insulin pump user for at least 3 months * HbA1c 9.5% * With the exception of T1DM, the subject is considered generally healthy upon completion of medical history, physical examination, vital signs, ECG and biochemical investigations as judged by the Investigator

Exclusion criteria

* Female of childbearing potential who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant or are not using adequate contraceptive methods (adequate contraceptive measures include sterilization, hormonal intrauterine devices, oral contraceptives, sexual abstinence, vasectomized partner) * Subject has any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator or qualified Investigational Centre staff, may preclude him/her from participating in the study and completing study related procedures. * Subject has impaired vision or hearing problems that could compromise the handling of the device as determined by Investigator or qualified Investigational Centre staff * Subject is unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement * Subject has any unresolved adverse skin condition in the area of sensor placement (e.g. psoriasis, rash, Staphylococcus infection) * Subject has travel plans which would make it difficult for the subject to attend on-site study visits as scheduled * Subject is actively participating in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein he/she has received treatment from an investigational study drug or investigational study device in the last 30 days * Subject known to be positive for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or Hepatitis C antibodies (or diagnosed with active hepatitis according to local practice). * Positive result to the screening test for HIV-1 antibodies, HIV-2 antibodies or HIV-1 antigen according to locally used diagnostic testing * Significant history of alcoholism or drug/chemical abuse as per investigator's judgment, current regular alcohol consumption of more than 1 unit per day for women and more than 2 units per day for men \[1 unit of alcohol equals 1 beer (330 mL), 1 glass of wine (120 mL), or 1 glass of spirits (40 mL)\], or a positive result in the urine drug/alcohol screen at the screening visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensor Accuracy4 monthsSensor values were compared to YSI plasma glucose values, which is considered as the gold standard, during the frequent sample testing day (day 3). MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of YSI reference and Sensor glucose values / YSI reference glucose values) \* 100).
Consensus Error Grid Analysis of Paired Sensor and Reference Plasma Glucose Values4 monthsAll analysis performed using the Consensus Error Grid (or Parkes error grid) comparing the paired sensor and YSI reference glucose values. Zone A is defined in the Parkes error grid as the zone of clinical accurate measurements with no effect on clinical action. Zone B as altered clinical action with little or no effect on clinical outcome.. Ideal situation is 100% in Zone A + B.
Sensor Survival4 monthssensor survival in hours

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All Subjects

Pre-assignment details

All Subjects

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
All Subjects
24
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Age, Continuous40.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Region of Enrollment
Europe
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Consensus Error Grid Analysis of Paired Sensor and Reference Plasma Glucose Values

All analysis performed using the Consensus Error Grid (or Parkes error grid) comparing the paired sensor and YSI reference glucose values. Zone A is defined in the Parkes error grid as the zone of clinical accurate measurements with no effect on clinical action. Zone B as altered clinical action with little or no effect on clinical outcome.. Ideal situation is 100% in Zone A + B.

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All SubjectsConsensus Error Grid Analysis of Paired Sensor and Reference Plasma Glucose Values100.0 percentage
Primary

Sensor Accuracy

Sensor values were compared to YSI plasma glucose values, which is considered as the gold standard, during the frequent sample testing day (day 3). MARD = Mean of ((Absolute difference of YSI reference and Sensor glucose values / YSI reference glucose values) \* 100).

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsSensor Accuracy9.13 percentageStandard Deviation 7.14
Primary

Sensor Survival

sensor survival in hours

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All SubjectsSensor Survival130.8 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026