Skip to content

Routine and Deferred Dialysis Initiation

A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Routine and Deferred Dialysis Initiation in Chinese Population

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02423655
Acronym
RADDI
Enrollment
1049
Registered
2015-04-22
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of deferred dialysis initiation in Chinese population. 16 tertiary hospitals across China will be randomly assigned into routine and deferred dialysis groups.

Detailed description

The timing for initiating dialysis for progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is an important issue yet is not well established. There is a strong trend to early dialysis initiation for end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients over the past decades. However, observational data found that early initiation seemed to produce no benefit but additional burden to patients and the health care system. The IDEAL study, the only randomized, controlled trial (RCT) on this issue, found that all-cause mortality, comorbidities and quality of life had no difference between early (glomerular filtration rate, GFR 10-14ml/min/1.73m2) and late (GFR 5-7ml/min/1.73m2) dialysis starters. However there was a big limitation in this study that the difference for average GFR between two groups (12 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 9.8 ml/min/1.73m2) was not so separate. Recently, the Canadian Society of Nephrology have released a clinical practice guideline on this issue. The guideline recommends an intent-to-defer approach for dialysis initiation and to initiate dialysis in the absence of symptoms in patients with an estimated GFR of 6 ml/min /1.73 m2 or less. In this guideline the specialists also express that the optimal management of patients with an estimated GFR of 6 ml/min per 1.73 m2 or less is based on limited data. There is a gap in knowledge. This research will further evaluate the efficacy and safety of deferred dialysis initiation and fill in this gap. In this study, algorithms will be adopted to determine the timing of dialysis initiation for both routine and deferred dialiysis groups, and the only difference in these two algorithms is the GFR level to initiate dialysis (7 Vs. \<5 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The theory that blood access (arteriovenous fistulas) can be timely prepared according to the past GFR decline trajectory will also be tested.

Interventions

OTHERAlgorithm for deferred dialysis intervention

Use combined indications to guide researchers to defer dialyzing progressive CKD patients. Asymptomatic patient will not start dialysis treatment until his eGFR becomes less than 5 ml/min/1.73m2. Or until 1. Patient's Kraemer index is \>6 or with overt fluid overload after trying all conservative means(including appropriate medicines) 2. Patient's Subjective Global Assessment method (SGA) assessment is grade C 3. Patients have indications for emergency dialysis 4. Sever symptoms which cannot be relieved by conservative treatment

OTHERAlgorithm for routine dialysis intervention

Use combined indications to guide researchers to initiate dialysis in progressive CKD patients routinely. Researchers will start dialysis treatment for a patient when his eGFR reaches 7 ml/min/1.73m2 in asymptomatic patients. Or patients have indications below: 1. Patient's Kraemer index is \>6 or with overt fluid overload after trying all conservative means(including appropriate medicines) 2. Patient's SGA assessment is grade C 3. Patients have indications for emergency dialysis 4. Sever symptoms which cannot be relieved by conservative treatment

Sponsors

Peking University First Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shaanxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shengjing Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of BaoTou Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Beijing Haidian Hospital/Beijing Haidian Section of Peking University Third Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Beijing Tongren Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
CollaboratorOTHER
First Hospital of China Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Ruijin Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Nondialysis-dependent stable CKD stage 4-5 patients (eGFR\>7ml/min /1.73 m2) 2. Willing to choose dialysis as his renal replacement therapy method 3. Heart function: grade I or II (NYHA Functional Classification)

Exclusion criteria

1. The life expectancy of patients is estimated to be short (due to causes other than kidney disease); 2. Acute infection occurred in one month; 3. Myocardial infarction, NYHA class IV or stroke events within 3 months; 4. Uncontrolled malignancy; 5. Active viral hepatitis; 6. Active rheumatic disease; 7. Pregnant women, women intending to conceive after enrollment or breastfeeding woman; 8. Planning to take kidney transplantation within the study period; 9. With indices of emergency dialysis; 10. eGFR less than 7 ml/min/1.73m2 in first visit; 11. Under other clinical studies which has an impact on this study; 12. Unable to provide written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortality: Proportion of patients who die from any causeFrom date of enrollment until the end of study, assessed up to 3 yearsProportion of patients who die from any cause during observation period.
Acute nonfatal cerebro-cardiovascular events before dialysis initiationFrom date of enrollment until the date of dialysis initiation, or the date of death from any cause,or the end of study, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 yearProportion of patients who suffer from acute nonfatal cerebro-cardiovascular events before dialysis initiation. Cerebro-cardiovascular events include acute myocardial infarction,acute coronary ischemia syndrome,acute heart failure, acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure ,severe arrhythmia, stroke, etc.
Acute nonfatal cerebro-cardiovascular events after dialysis initiationFrom date of dialysis initiation until the date of death from any cause,or the end of study, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 yearProportion of patients who suffer from acute nonfatal cerebro-cardiovascular events after dialysis initiation. Cerebro-cardiovascular events include acute myocardial infarction,acute coronary ischemia syndrome,acute heart failure, acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure ,severe arrhythmia, stroke, etc.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications of dialysisFrom date of dialysis initiation until the date of death from any cause,or the end of study, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 yearProportion of patients who suffer from dialysis complications including blood acess infection, thrombosis, hypotension, etc.
CostsFrom date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause,or the end of study, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years, performed every 3 monthsAll money patients and insurance agency spend on medical care related with CKD
Hospitalization: Proportion of patients who are admitted to hospitalFrom date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause,or the end of study, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 yearProportion of patients who are admitted to hospital
Catheter usageFrom date of enrollment until the date of dialysis initiation, assessed up to 3 yearsProportion of patients using catheter as their blood access when dialysis initiation.
Arteriovenous fistulas usageFrom date of enrollment until the date of dialysis initiation, assessed up to 3 yearsProportion of patients using arteriovenous fistulas as their blood access when dialysis initiation. The timing for preparing arteriovenous fistulas depends on the past GFR decline trajectory
Nutrition assessmentFrom date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause,or the end of study, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years, performed every 3 monthsSGA assessment and serum albumin level are used to assess nutrition status
Patient reported outcome of quality of lifeFrom date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause,or the end of study, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years, once every 3 monthsThe short form health survey questionnaire 36 will be used.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026