Skip to content

The Comparison of Efficacy Between Electromagnetic Stimulation Therapy and Electromagnetic Stimulation Therapy With Extracorporeal Biofeedback

The Comparison of Efficacy Between Electromagnetic Stimulation Therapy and Electromagnetic Stimulation Therapy With Extracorporeal Biofeedback

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02423486
Enrollment
66
Registered
2015-04-22
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2019-11-28
Last updated
2019-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Stress Incontinence

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy between Electromagnetic Stimulation therapy and Electromagnetic Stimulation therapy with Extracorporeal Biofeedback in Stress Urinary Incontinence patient.

Interventions

DEVICEElectromagnetic stimulation therapy (BIOCON-2000)
DEVICEElectromagnetic stimulation therapy with biofeedback

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female patient with Stress Urinary Incontinence, over 20 2. Leakage over 2g in stress pad test 3. Capable of understanding and having signed the informed consent form after full discussion of the research nature of the treatment and its risks and benefits

Exclusion criteria

1. Mixed Urinary Incontinence which is dominant in urge urinary incontinence. 2. True incontinence 3. Overflow incontinence 4. Patient who had performed electric stimulation therapy,bladder training within 2 weeks before baseline. 5. Urinary tract infection found In urine test. 6. Patient who had pelvic organ prolapse. 7. Patient who had inserted pacemaker. 8. Pregnant woman, patient who have positive result in urine pregnancy test, patient who have plan pregnancy during study period. 9. Disorder in Neurosystem like stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal injury, Parkinson's disease . 10. Patient who will participate in other clinical trial during this study. 11. Any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate comparison of complete recovery in stress pad test after 12 weeks of treatment12 weeksComplete recovery is defined as urinary leakage below than 2 gram in stress pad test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incontinence Severity VAS at baseline,4weeks,8weeks,12weeks after treatment12 weeks
Sandvik questionnaire at baseline,4weeks,8weeks,12weeks after treatment12 weeks
Incontinence - Quality of Life questionnaire at baseline,8weeks,12 weeks after treatment12 weeks
Benefit,Satisfaction and Willingness to Continue questionnaire at 12 weeks after treatment12 weeks
Pelvic floor muscular strength at baseline,4weeks,8weeks,12weeks after treatment12 weeksIntravaginal pressure, Extracorporeal pelvic floor muscular strength, Oxford Scale at baseline,4weeks,8weeks,12weeks after treatment

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026