Skip to content

Comparison of the Airway Clearance Efficacy of Electro Flo 5000 and the G5 Flimm-Fighter in Patients With CF

Comparison of the Airway Clearance Efficacy of Electro Flo 5000 and the G5 Flimm-Fighter in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis (CF)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02423447
Enrollment
25
Registered
2015-04-22
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2016-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Brief summary

It is the goal of the proposed study to compare the efficacy, as assessed primarily by sputum weight, of these two different devices (the Electroflo 500 and the G5 Flimm-Fighter) for airway clearance (AC) in CF patients with mild to moderate lung disease, who have stable lung health and perform AC at home as part of their routine therapeutic regimen.

Detailed description

The investigators hope to enroll 25 patients with cystic fibrosis (with daily sputum production) in this study. It is the goal of the proposed study to compare the efficacy, as assessed primarily by sputum weight, of these two different devices (the Electroflo 500 and the G5 Flimm-Fighter) for airway clearance (AC) in CF patients with mild to moderate lung disease, who have stable lung health and perform AC at home as part of their routine therapeutic regimen.

Interventions

DEVICEElectro-Flo Intervention

An assigned respiratory therapist performed airway clearance on each participant with the Electro-Flo device following the 2012 CFF therapy guidelines

DEVICEG5 Intervention

An assigned respiratory therapist performed airway clearance on each participant with the G5 device following the 2012 CFF therapy guidelines

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of CF established by standard criteria (sweat chloride \> 60 mmol/L and/or two alleles affected by gene mutations know to be associated with CF). 2. Age older than 8 years. 3. Known to consistently produce sputum. 4. Currently on a home therapeutic regimen that includes some form of AC performed at least 1 time daily. 5. FEV1 \> 30%-predicted, and with stable lung function

Exclusion criteria

1. Hospitalization for CF pulmonary complications in the 1 months preceding enrollment. 2. Hemoptysis \> 60 cc in a single episode in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment. 3. Chronic chest pain. 4. Participation in another interventional clinical trial in the previous 30 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wet Sputum WeightEnd of study visit per interventionTo compare the wet to dry weight of study patients' sputum collected during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions.
Dry Sputum WeightEnd of study visit per interventionTo compare the wet to dry weight of study patients' sputum collected during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions.
Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.End of study visit per interventionComparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.End of study visit per interventionComparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive.
PRO (Patient-reported Outcome)End of study visit per interventionInvestigators will question the study patients re: their tolerability and comfort after the intervention on Day 1 & Day 2 visits.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Electro-Flo Intervention: An assigned respiratory therapist performed airway clearance on each participant with the Electro-Flo device following the 2012 CFF therapy guidelines. G5 Intervention: An assigned respiratory therapist performed airway clearance on each participant with the G5 device following the 2012 CFF therapy guidelines.
25
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants
Basline Pulmonary Function (FEV1)2.42 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.28
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Dry Sputum Weight

To compare the wet to dry weight of study patients' sputum collected during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions.

Time frame: End of study visit per intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ElectroFlo ArmDry Sputum Weight0.21 gram
G5 Flimm Fighter ArmDry Sputum Weight0.15 gram
Primary

Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.

Comparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive.

Time frame: End of study visit per intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ElectroFlo ArmPulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.71.36 percentage of predicted value
G5 Flimm Fighter ArmPulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.71.52 percentage of predicted value
Primary

Wet Sputum Weight

To compare the wet to dry weight of study patients' sputum collected during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions.

Time frame: End of study visit per intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ElectroFlo ArmWet Sputum Weight5.22 gram
G5 Flimm Fighter ArmWet Sputum Weight4.19 gram
Secondary

PRO (Patient-reported Outcome)

Investigators will question the study patients re: their tolerability and comfort after the intervention on Day 1 & Day 2 visits.

Time frame: End of study visit per intervention

Population: Patients rated comfort on a scale of 1 (most comfortable) to 10 (most un-comfortable)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ElectroFlo ArmPRO (Patient-reported Outcome)3.24 units on a scale
G5 Flimm Fighter ArmPRO (Patient-reported Outcome)3.2 units on a scale
Secondary

Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.

Comparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive.

Time frame: End of study visit per intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ElectroFlo ArmPulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.69.16 percentage of predicted value
G5 Flimm Fighter ArmPulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.69.84 percentage of predicted value

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026