Skip to content

Comparison of Miller's Blade and Airtraq Laryngoscope in Children

A Comparative Evaluation of Airtraq Optical LaryngoscopeTM and Miller Blade in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Requiring Tracheal Intubation.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02423317
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-04-22
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2016-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Intratracheal

Brief summary

The Airtraq optical laryngoscope has recently been available in pediatric sizes. The investigators compared the efficacy of Airtraq with the Miller laryngoscope as intubation devices in paediatric patients. This prospective, randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II paediatric patients of 2-10 years, posted for routine surgery requiring tracheal intubation were randomly allocated to undergo intubation using a Miller (n = 30) or Airtraq (n = 30) laryngoscope. The primary outcome measures were time of intubation, ease of intubation, number of attempts and POGO score. We also measured hemodynamic changes and airway trauma.

Detailed description

After approval from the institutional Ethical Committee, 60 patients were studied. A randomised prospective study was planned to compare size 1 Airtraq (Prodol Meditec S.A., Vizcaya, Spain) with Miller blade of same size. The children included in the study were 2-10 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II and posted for elective surgeries requiring tracheal intubation. The following were excluded from the study: (i) patients with upper respiratory tract symptoms, (ii) those at risk of gastroesophageal regurgitation and (iii) those with airway-related conditions such a trismus, limited mouth opening, trauma or mass. Sixty patients were equally randomized to one of the two groups (Airtraq and Miller) of 30 each for airway management using a computer-generated randomization program. Written informed consent was taken from the parents prior to intervention and a standardized protocol for anesthesia was maintained for all cases. All the children were kept nil per mouth as per standard guidelines. Intubation attempts were taken using Airtraq or Miller on a random basis.

Interventions

DEVICEIntubation with Miller's blade

Intubation is insertion of a hollow tube inside the trachea. It is done after laryngoscopy with Miller's blade.

DEVICEIntubation with Airtraq

Intubation is insertion of a hollow tube inside the trachea. It is done after laryngoscopy with Airtraq.

Sponsors

Government Medical College, Haldwani
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, 2. elective surgeries requiring tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

1. patients with upper respiratory tract symptoms, 2. those at risk of gastroesophageal regurgitation and 3. those with airway-related conditions such a trismus, limited mouth opening, trauma or mass.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Intubation5 minutesIt is defined as the time from placement of Airtraq or Miller laryngoscope into the mouth till appearance of the capnograph waveform

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ease of Intubation.5 minutesThe intubating anaesthesiologist graded the ease of intubation for both techniques on a visual analogue scale from 1 to 10, 10 being most difficult or failed intubation and 1 being very easy intubation.
Percentage of Glottic Opening Scoring.5 minutesThe Percentage of glottic opening score represents the percentage of glottic opening seen, defined by the linear span from the anterior commissure to the interarytenoid notch
Number of Intubation in First Attempts;5 minutesA single insertion of the Airtraq or a single insertion of the Miller laryngoscope blade into the mouth with passing the endotracheal tube beyond the glottis was considered as an attempt.
Number of Esophageal Intubation.5 minutesInsertion of tracheal tube inside the esophagus
Number of Participants With Airway Trauma5 minutesAirway trauma was defined as blood detected on the blades of laryngoscopes, blood on endotracheal tube after extubation or tongue-lip-dental trauma.
Overall Intubation Success Rate.5 minutesIt is the number of participants who were successfully intubated after first, second or third attempts. Success of intubation is defined as placement of endotracheal tube inside the trachea, confirmed by bilateral chest auscultation and square wave capnograph tracing.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intubation With Miller's Blade
After induction and muscle paralysis, Miller's blade was introduced in the patient's mouth. After visualization of vocal cord, patient was intubated with appropriate sized tracheal tube. Intubation with Miller's blade: Intubation is insertion of a hollow tube inside the trachea. It is done after laryngoscopy with Miller's blade.
30
Intubation With Airtraq Laryngoscope
After induction and muscle paralysis, Airtraq laryngoscope's blade was introduced in the patient's mouth. After visualization of vocal cord as a reflected image in the viewfinder of the device, patient was intubated with appropriate sized tracheal tube. Intubation with Airtraq: Intubation is insertion of a hollow tube inside the trachea. It is done after laryngoscopy with Airtraq.
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntubation With Miller's BladeIntubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopeTotal
Age, Continuous5.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78
6.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.64
5.775 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.21
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants25 Participants44 Participants
Weight15.9 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.53
16.5 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.87
16.2 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Intubation

It is defined as the time from placement of Airtraq or Miller laryngoscope into the mouth till appearance of the capnograph waveform

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubation With Miller's BladeTime to Intubation15.13 secondsStandard Deviation 1.33
Intubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopeTime to Intubation11.53 secondsStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Ease of Intubation.

The intubating anaesthesiologist graded the ease of intubation for both techniques on a visual analogue scale from 1 to 10, 10 being most difficult or failed intubation and 1 being very easy intubation.

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Intubation With Miller's BladeEase of Intubation.5 scores on visual analogue scale
Intubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopeEase of Intubation.3 scores on visual analogue scale
Secondary

Number of Esophageal Intubation.

Insertion of tracheal tube inside the esophagus

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intubation With Miller's BladeNumber of Esophageal Intubation.4 esophageal intubation
Intubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopeNumber of Esophageal Intubation.0 esophageal intubation
Secondary

Number of Intubation in First Attempts;

A single insertion of the Airtraq or a single insertion of the Miller laryngoscope blade into the mouth with passing the endotracheal tube beyond the glottis was considered as an attempt.

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intubation With Miller's BladeNumber of Intubation in First Attempts;25 Intubations
Intubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopeNumber of Intubation in First Attempts;29 Intubations
Secondary

Number of Participants With Airway Trauma

Airway trauma was defined as blood detected on the blades of laryngoscopes, blood on endotracheal tube after extubation or tongue-lip-dental trauma.

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intubation With Miller's BladeNumber of Participants With Airway Trauma3 participants
Intubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With Airway Trauma1 participants
Secondary

Overall Intubation Success Rate.

It is the number of participants who were successfully intubated after first, second or third attempts. Success of intubation is defined as placement of endotracheal tube inside the trachea, confirmed by bilateral chest auscultation and square wave capnograph tracing.

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intubation With Miller's BladeOverall Intubation Success Rate.30 participants
Intubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopeOverall Intubation Success Rate.30 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Glottic Opening Scoring.

The Percentage of glottic opening score represents the percentage of glottic opening seen, defined by the linear span from the anterior commissure to the interarytenoid notch

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Intubation With Miller's BladePercentage of Glottic Opening Scoring.75 percentage of glottic opening
Intubation With Airtraq LaryngoscopePercentage of Glottic Opening Scoring.100 percentage of glottic opening

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026