Skip to content

Bilateral Dispensing Study of Fanfilcon A Toric Versus Enfilcon A Toric Lenses

Bilateral Dispensing Study of Fanfilcon A Toric Versus Enfilcon A Toric Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02423109
Enrollment
44
Registered
2015-04-22
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2018-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia, Hyperopia, Astigmatism

Brief summary

Bilateral dispensing clinical trial of fanfilcon A toric lens verses enfilcon A toric lens over two weeks.

Detailed description

Evaluation of the clinical performance of an investigational silicone-hydrogel lens called fanfilcon A (test) compared to a FDA-cleared commercially available contact lens called enfilcon A toric lens (control) when worn on a daily wear basis over 2 weeks in a randomized, bilateral, cross-over, dispensing study.

Interventions

contact lens

contact lens

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Are at least 17 years of age for Canada and 18 years of age for the USA and have full legal capacity to volunteer; * Have read and signed an information consent letter; * Are willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; * Are an adapted soft contact lens wearer; * Require spectacle lens powers in both eyes; * Sphere: between -0.50 to -6.00 diopters and * Astigmatism: between -1.25 to -2.00 and * Axis: 180 ± 20 degrees * Are willing to wear contact lens in both eyes; * Have manifest refraction visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than logMAR equivalent of 20/25 in each eye; * To be eligible for lens dispensing, the subject must have VA of logMAR equivalent of 20/30 or better in each eye with the study lenses and the investigator must judge the fit including toric orientation as acceptable;

Exclusion criteria

* Are participating in any concurrent clinical or research study; * Have any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection; * Have a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; * Are using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; * Have known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study; * Are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit); * Are aphakic; * Have undergone refractive error surgery;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comfort (Subjective Rating Scale)Dispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeksParticipant rating for comfort at dispense visit and at the 2 week follow-up on a subjective rating scale (0-100, 0=cannot be worn. Causes pain,100=Cannot be felt ever)
Comfort PreferenceDispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeksSubjective assessment for comfort preference for each lens pair. Choices: fanfilcon A lens, enfilcon A lens, No preference.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

44 subjects were enrolled (assigned an ID per protocol), but 11 were not assigned to any group due to screen failure.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
All subjects were wore both fanfilcon A and enfilcon A toric lenses as either the first or second intervention.
44
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Lens 1Adverse Event10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Continuous24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 330 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Comfort Preference

Subjective assessment for comfort preference for each lens pair. Choices: fanfilcon A lens, enfilcon A lens, No preference.

Time frame: Dispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeks

Population: Analysis population differs slightly due to protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fanfilcon AComfort Preferencefanfilcon A12 Participants
Fanfilcon AComfort Preferenceenfilcon A10 Participants
Fanfilcon AComfort PreferenceNo Preference9 Participants
Enfilcon AComfort Preferencefanfilcon A14 Participants
Enfilcon AComfort Preferenceenfilcon A12 Participants
Enfilcon AComfort PreferenceNo Preference5 Participants
Primary

Comfort (Subjective Rating Scale)

Participant rating for comfort at dispense visit and at the 2 week follow-up on a subjective rating scale (0-100, 0=cannot be worn. Causes pain,100=Cannot be felt ever)

Time frame: Dispensing (Baseline) and 2 weeks

Population: Analysis population differs slightly due to 1 participant who was excluded from analysis due to a protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fanfilcon AComfort (Subjective Rating Scale)Dispensing87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Fanfilcon AComfort (Subjective Rating Scale)2 week79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Enfilcon AComfort (Subjective Rating Scale)Dispensing88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Enfilcon AComfort (Subjective Rating Scale)2 week76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026