Skip to content

Treatment of Back Pain Using Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation (TCMS)

Treatment of Back Pain Using Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation (TCMS)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02421757
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-04-21
Start date
2016-08-22
Completion date
2017-06-22
Last updated
2021-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Back Pain

Keywords

Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation, placebo

Brief summary

This is a single-site, randomized, Single-blinded, placebo-controlled, trial of Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation (TCMS) for the treatment of lower back pain. TCMS will be applied locally to the back in the location of a patient's pain.

Detailed description

Approximately one third of Americans suffer from acute and chronic pain and pain has been called a silent epidemic. Treatment of pain often involves opioid medications with a significant potential for abuse, addiction and adverse reactions such as respiratory depression and death. Magnetic brain stimulation has been used for the treatment of pain. There are reports of its use in phantom-limb pain and in the treatment of central and peripheral pain syndromes. The study will evaluate whether an experimental medical device (Fischell TCMS Pain Treatment Device) that emits pulses of a brief, intense magnetic field will relieve pain in the lower back. Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation (TCMS) is the name of this method of delivering magnetic pulses through the skin. TCMS has been approved by the FDA for peripheral nerve stimulation, treatment of migraine headaches and for depression but this type of device has not been studied scientifically for the treatment of back pain. No significant adverse reactions or side effects have been reported with the use of magnetic stimulation for headache treatment. Some patients who have migraine headaches have excellent pain relief with the magnetic treatment even if they do not get pain relief with medications. Other patients do not have headache relief with magnetic treatment. The current use of TCMS applied to the head requires special equipment and multiple treatment sessions. TCMS applied peripherally is easier to do, and may require fewer treatment sessions to achieve pain relief. Non-invasive treatment of pain would represent a significant advance in the field especially if its use both successfully treated pain and resulted in the reduction or elimination in the need for opioid medications. The investigators do not know whether magnetic treatment will relieve back pain so the investigators will test this by applying a powerful electromagnet to the area of the back having pain. In some patients, the magnet will be turned on, but in other patients the magnet will not be turned on. Neither patients nor patient's treating doctor will know whether the magnet was turned on or not, although the study team will know which patients received treatment with magnetic pulses. The effect on pain will be recorded periodically for 2 days. If the patients' reported pain is reduced by having the magnet turned on compared to patients' who do not have the magnet turned on, then the magnet may have reduced the pain. Additional studies in patients will be needed to be sure that the magnet therapy is reducing low back pain.

Interventions

DEVICEFischell Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation Pain Treatment Device

Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation

DEVICEPlacebo

The placebo Transcutaneous device

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult, age \>18 years of age 2. Prescription pharmacologic treatment is insufficient for treatment of pain 3. Pain duration of ≥ 6 months 4. Pain limits physical activity 5. Pain occurs daily 6. Chronic low back pain, with or without leg pain, associated with MRI or other imaging study consistent with lumbo-sacral spine disease with or without nerve compression 7. Pain intensity ≥ 5 at the time of enrollment a a self-reported pain score of ≥ 4 over the 7 preceding days.

Exclusion criteria

1. Life expectancy ≤ 6 months for any reason 2. Oral opiate dosing or type of opioid that has changed in past 12 months 3. Received intraspinal (e.g., epidural, intrathecal) medication in the past 6 months 4. Use of intravenous pain medication in the past 6 months 5. Active use of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) \[within 30 days\] 6. History of seizures 7. History of implanted medical device, cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator, or other implant (Cochlear etc) 8. History of cardiac dysrhythmias 9. Member of vulnerable population 10. Current or potential legal action of disability claim related to back pain 11. Body Mass Index (BMI) \>35 12. Another pain condition that might confound results, including back pain above the waistline 13. Women of child-bearing potential 14. Inability to undergo study assessments or complete questionnaires independently 15. Metal objects in the body (i.e. Aneurysm clip, bullet fragment) 16. Active psychological co-morbidites (i.e. uncontrolled schizophrenia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)60 minutesImmediate relief measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scale from 0-10 0=No pain 10= Worse possible pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Durable Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)30 daysDurable pain relief measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) 0= No pain 10= Worse imaginable pain

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruited at the Pain Management Center at University of Maryland Rehabilitation & Orthopaedic Institute from 8/22/2016-4/27/2017.

Pre-assignment details

Patients who agreed to participate were provided with a pain diary and were instructed to document their average pain each day for a week using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) to establish their baseline level of pain. Patients were also given the Global Pain Scale (GPS) to complete and return on the day of treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation
Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation Fischell Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation Pain Treatment Device: Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation
11
Sham Device
Sham Device Placebo: The placebo Transcutaneous device
9
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTranscutaneous Magnetic StimulationSham DeviceTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants9 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Immediate Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

Immediate relief measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scale from 0-10 0=No pain 10= Worse possible pain

Time frame: 60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Transcutaneous Magnetic StimulationImmediate Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)4.89 score on a scale
Sham DeviceImmediate Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)5.18 score on a scale
Secondary

Durable Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

Durable pain relief measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) 0= No pain 10= Worse imaginable pain

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Transcutaneous Magnetic StimulationDurable Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)6.00 score on a scale
Sham DeviceDurable Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)6.57 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026