Comparison of Single İncision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Quality-of-life, Body Image and Cosmesis After Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC)

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02417857

Enrollment

Registered

2015-04-16

Start date

2011-01-31

Completion date

2014-03-31

Last updated

2015-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures

Keywords

Single İncision Laparoscopic Surgery, Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of quality-of-life measures and evaluate the body image and cosmesis between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC).Twenty eight patients underwent SILC and 30 underwent LC.Fifty-eight patients were included the study and divided into two groups. The results of the questionnaires were statistically compared.

Detailed description

Recently, single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is one of the minimally invasive technique, developed to reduce the need of multiple ports and has become popular among the surgeons. This study was conducted with fifty eight patients between January 2011 and March 2013 in Turkey. Fifty-eight patients were included the study and divided into two groups. Quality-of-life measures was evaluated by the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire.Cosmesis and body image were evaluated with the Body Image Questionnaire. All statistical analyses were performed by IBM Statistics 21.0 and MS-Excel 2007. A value of p\<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Single Incision)

We performed Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) operation to the group-1

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Conventional)

We performed Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC) to group-2

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The patients who were scheduled for elective cholecystectomy were included in the study

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * acute cholecystitis * ASA 3-4 (American Society of Anesthesiologists) * history of bile duct stone migration * biller pancreatitis * upper laparatomy * any ventral hernia repair * chronic systemic disease or * with allergic attitude to any agent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Quality of life measure	We had performed the questionnaire at postoperative 6 th month

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Body Image Questionnaire measure	We had performed the questionnaire at postoperative 6 th month

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026