Skip to content

Local Heat Stress in Autonomic Failure Patients With Supine Hypertension

Local Heat Stress in Autonomic Failure Patients With Supine Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02417415
Enrollment
22
Registered
2015-04-15
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2022-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, Pure Autonomic Failure, Multiple System Atrophy, Autonomic Failure

Keywords

Supine hypertension, Autonomic failure, Heat intolerance, Orthostatic hypotension, Heat stress

Brief summary

Patients with autonomic failure are characterized by disabling orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure on standing), and at least half of them also have high blood pressure while lying down (supine hypertension). Exposure to heat, such as in hot environments, often worsens their orthostatic hypotension. The causes of this are not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether applying local heat over the abdomen of patients with autonomic failure and supine hypertension would decrease their high blood pressure while lying down. This will help us better understand the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, and may be of use in the treatment of supine hypertension.

Detailed description

Primary autonomic failure is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by severe impairment of the autonomic nervous system. The clinical hallmark of autonomic failure is disabling orthostatic hypotension, but at least half of patients are also hypertensive while lying down. This supine hypertension can be severe and associated with end-organ damage and worsening of orthostatic hypotension due to increased pressure natriuresis. It also complicates the management of these patients by limiting the use of daytime pressor agents for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. It is well known that heat exposure (e.g. hot weather or a hot bath or shower) produces an acute and temporary worsening of orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure patients. However, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are completely unexplored. Factors that may predispose autonomic failure patients to the acute lowering blood pressure effects of heat stress include 1) impaired heat dissipation due to inability to sweat, 2) preserved heat-mediated skin vasodilation, and 3) blunted sympathetic hemodynamic responses to maintain blood pressure. In this study, we test the hypothesis that moderate levels of local (abdominal) passive heat stress will lower blood pressure in autonomic failure patients with supine hypertension. To test this hypothesis, we propose this pilot study with the following specific aims: 1. To evaluate the acute blood pressure effects of local passive heat stress in autonomic failure patients with supine hypertension, we will compare changes in BP between controlled local heat stress (\ 44ºC) using a commercial heating pad that covers the abdomen and part of the torso, and a control (non-heating) study day using the same heating pad but turned off. 2. To evaluate the mechanisms underlying BP changes during local heat stress, we will compare changes in hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, stroke volume and peripheral vascular resistance), segmental fluid shifts (measured by segmental bioimpedance), skin blood flow and skin temperature between the heat and non-heating study days.

Interventions

Passive heat stress will be applied with a commercial heating pad that covers all the abdomen and part of the torso to provide local heating at \ 44ºC continuously for 2 hr.

OTHERControl (non-heating)

Heating pad will be applied over the abdomen and part of the torso but it will be turned off.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients were blinded to the intervention

Intervention model description

randomized, 2-arm crossover study (heat vs. sham)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients, between 18-80 yrs., with primary autonomic failure (Parkinson Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, and Pure Autonomic Failure) and supine hypertension. Supine hypertension will be defined as SBP≥150 mmHg. * Patients able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Significant cardiac, renal or hepatic illness, or with contraindications to administration of pressor agents or with other factors, which in the investigator's opinion would prevent the subject from completing the protocol including clinically significant abnormalities in clinical, mental or laboratory testing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure2 hours of heat stress or shamChange from baseline in systolic blood pressure at 2 hr post-intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)2 hours of heat stress or shamPercent change from baseline (\[post-intervention - baseline\]/baseline X 100) in cardiac output, stroke volume and systemic vascular resistance at 2 hours post-intervention

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Participants who were randomized to receive local passive heat stress and sham control in any order.
22
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
BMI27 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Diagnosis
Multiple System Atrophy
1 Participants
Diagnosis
Parkinson Disease + Autonomic Failure
7 Participants
Diagnosis
Pure Autonomic Failure
14 Participants
Disease Duration7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Heart rate, supine67 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Heart rate, upright77 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Heat intolerance15 Participants
Medical history of essential hypertension10 Participants
Plasma norepinephrine, supine132 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 70
Plasma norepinephrine, upright199 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 136
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants
Systolic BP, supine170 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23
Systolic BP, upright100 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure at 2 hr post-intervention

Time frame: 2 hours of heat stress or sham

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Heat StressChange in Systolic Blood Pressure19 mm HgStandard Error 4
Control (Non-heating)Change in Systolic Blood Pressure3 mm HgStandard Error 4
Secondary

Percent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)

Percent change from baseline (\[post-intervention - baseline\]/baseline X 100) in cardiac output, stroke volume and systemic vascular resistance at 2 hours post-intervention

Time frame: 2 hours of heat stress or sham

Population: Systemic hemodynamics were measured in 13 of the 22 participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Heat StressPercent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)Cardiac Output-15 percentage changeStandard Error 5
Local Heat StressPercent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)Stroke Volume-18 percentage changeStandard Error 5
Local Heat StressPercent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)Systemic Vascular Resistance9 percentage changeStandard Error 6
Control (Non-heating)Percent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)Cardiac Output-2 percentage changeStandard Error 4
Control (Non-heating)Percent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)Stroke Volume-4 percentage changeStandard Error 4
Control (Non-heating)Percent Change in Hemodynamic Parameters (Cardiac Output, Stroke Volume and Systemic Vascular Resistance)Systemic Vascular Resistance4 percentage changeStandard Error 5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026