Skip to content

Memory Aid by Intranasal Insulin in Diabetes (MemAID)

Memory Advancement by Intranasal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02415556
Acronym
MemAID
Enrollment
289
Registered
2015-04-14
Start date
2015-10-06
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2022-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Intranasal Insulin, Placebo, Memory, Gait, Non diabetic older controls

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to find the long-term effects of daily administration of 40 IU of intranasal insulin (INI) as compared to placebo (sterile saline) on cognition and memory in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and non-diabetic controls over 24 weeks with a follow-up period for 24 weeks. Four groups will be tested: DM group treated with INI; DM group treated with placebo; control group treated with INI and the control group treated with placebo. The INI or placebo will be delivered into the nose. The investigators are interested to see whether INI can improve memory and cognition and blood flow in the brain in the type 2 DM group as compared to placebo and to the non-diabetic group over a long-term period.

Detailed description

The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial determining the long-term effects of intranasal insulin (INI) on cognition and memory in type 2 diabetes (DM) and non-DM groups. The investigators hypothesize that: 1) INI-treated adults with DM have better memory and functioning of specific cognitive domains and faster walking during a dual task than those treated with placebo and the control group; 2) Glycemic and insulin resistance and genetic markers for Alzheimer's disease (Apolipoprotein E4 \[ApoE4\]) may serve as predictors of positive responses to INI therapy; 3) INI treatment neither adversely affects systemic glycemic levels or the cardiovascular system nor causes weight gain. Aim 1: To determine whether INI-treated type 2 DM adults have a) better memory and functioning of specific cognitive domains and b) faster dual-task gait speed and better daily living functioning than the placebo-treated and non-DM groups. Four groups will be tested: 60 DM subjects treated with insulin; 60 DM subjects treated with placebo; 45 control subjects treated with INI and 45 control subjects treated with placebo. These 210 patients are expected to complete treatment and 168 are expected to complete study by the study completion anticipated date. The investigators will conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 120 older adults with type 2 DM and 90 non-DM controls examining whether 40 IU INI once daily over a 24-week period improves: * Specific domains of visuospatial attention and memory, verbal learning (primary outcomes); * Gait speed during a dual task (which is an excellent predictor of overall health), daily living functionality, and depression as compared to the DM group receiving sterile saline and the non-DM groups. The non-DM groups will provide reference of INI effects in a clinical phenotype of cognitive decline and insulin resistance that occurs with normal aging. Aim 2: To identify a phenotype and long-term trajectory predicting clinically relevant response to INI therapy based on glycemic control, insulin resistance, endothelial and genetic markers. 1. The investigators will determine a phenotype predicting a clinically relevant response to INI therapy and identify time-dependent trajectories of INI effects on cognition in the DM group vs. the placebo and the non-DM groups. Clinical predictors will be based on associations between cognitive function and/or gait and demographic, glycemic control, insulin resistance, endothelial and genetic (ApoE4) measures. 2. The investigators will evaluate the dose-escalating trajectory of cognition, gait speed, and functionality during the 24 weeks of therapy and 24 weeks post-treatment and their dependence on the above-mentioned factors, and determine the time point when maximum effect was reached. INI therapy response is defined as a clinically relevant improvement on cognitive tests or in gait speed (as a continuous variable) or as responders vs. non-responders as compared to placebo within DM and non-DM groups (as a categorical variable). 3. MRI substudy: The investigators will explore the long-term INI effects on regional perfusion, vasodilatation, and resting functional connectivity in 40 DM subjects pre- and post- INI/placebo administration at the beginning and at the end of intervention and their relationships to cognitive outcomes. Regional perfusion and vasodilatation will be measured by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) MRI at 3 Tesla, and resting-state functional connectivity will be quantified from low-frequency (0.01-0.08 Hz) fluctuations (LFF) of the whole-brain blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Aim 3: To determine the long-term safety of INI vs. placebo with regard to glycemic control (fasting glucose, hemoglobin A1c \[HbA1c\], hypoglycemic episodes), vital signs, and body mass. 1. The investigators will obtain measurements of fasting glucose, insulin, vital signs, and body mass at baseline, 2-months, 4-months, and 6-months follow-up and keep weekly logs monitoring glucose and adverse events. 2. Safety substudy: In the first 20 DM patients treated with subcutaneous insulin, the investigators will conduct continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) OR 5 finger sticks/day (effective after 9/25/2017) for 1 week during baseline and during the first week of INI or placebo treatment to evaluate the INI effects on glycemic control, hypoglycemic episodes, and body weight. This study may pave the way to potential treatment and/or cure of DM- and age-related cognitive decline.

Interventions

Regular human insulin 40 IU daily over 24 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Intranasal sterile saline 40 IU daily over 24 weeks

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

289 signed ICF. 244 were randomized (115 T2DM adults and 129 non-DM controls). 79 T2DM adults and 90 non-DM controls completed intervention (as of 4/23/2020)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women aged 50-85 years old * Able to walk for 6 minutes * Diabetes type 2 (DM) group: diagnosis and treatment for type 2 DM with non-insulin oral or injectable agents * Non-DM group with similar age range as the DM group, non-diabetic fasting plasma glucose (\<126 mg/dL) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (\<6.5%) * Participants capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Type 2 DM treated with insulin (since 9/25/2017) * Type 1 DM * Intolerance to insulin * History of severe hypoglycemia * Participants who have \>1 asymptomatic and/or symptomatic episode of hypoglycemia (glucose \< 54 mg/dL) during finger stick or plasma glucose (cut off value since 6/11/2018) * Acute medical condition that required either hospitalization or surgery within the past 6 months (e.g., severe hypoglycemia, malignancies, myocardial infarction,stroke) * Liver or renal failure or transplant * Dementia (Mini Mental State Examination \[MMSE\] scores ≤20) * Current recreational drug or alcohol abuse * Serious systemic disease that would interfere with conduction of clinical trial (mild forms of neurological conditions e.g. Parkinson's Disease, autonomic neuropathy etc. would be allowed) * Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) substudy in 40 DM patients only: claustrophobia and implants incompatible with 3-Tesla MRI * Safety substudy in 20 IDDM patients only: Insulin-treated type 2 diabetics with a C-peptide of \<0.8 ng/mLd and fasting blood glucose \>150 mg/dL will be excluded even without history of hypoglycemia during finger stick measurements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).Gait speed normal walk (cm/s) - difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.
Gait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).Gait speed dual-task (cm/s) - walking and counting backwards (subtracting 7) difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.
Executive Function Composite z ScoreMeasured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).The executive function composite score was calculated as a sum of Paired Associates Learning (PAL) and Spatial Working Memory (SWM) z-scores (range -2 to +2, 0 indicates the mean; higher score indicates worse outcome). Paired Associates Learning - raw score of Total Errors Adjusted (range 0-120) was converted to z-score. Spatial Working Memory - raw score SWM-Between Errors (range 0-42) and raw score of SWM-Strategy (range 8-56) were converted to z-scores. Executive function composite scores were compared between: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.
Verbal Memory Composite z ScoreMeasured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).Verbal memory composite score was calculated as the sum of Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) z scores ( 0 indicates the mean; lower score indicates worse outcome). VRM- Free Recall raw score (range 0-12), immediate and delayed VRM-Recognition raw score (range 0-24) were converted to z-scores. Verbal memory composite scores were compared between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).Long-term safety measure of fasting plasma glucose difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.
Weight (kg).Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).Long-term safety measure of weight difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cerebral Blood Flow on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).At baseline and at V8 (week 24) the last intervention.Difference in regional cerebral blood flow in right medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) was measured by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) MRI at 3 Tesla in 8 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin participants and 3 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo participants only.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited at two hospital sites. The study was activated by IRB on 4/1/42015. The first participant was enrolled (signed ICF) at BIDMC on 10/6/2015 and at BWH 6/22/2017 and the last participant was enrolled in December 2019.

Pre-assignment details

Of 668 screened participants, 289 signed ICF( enrolled), 244 were randomized to INI or placebo treatment, 223 completed baseline and were analyzed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin
40 IU of regular human insulin once daily over 24 weeks Regular Human Insulin: Regular human insulin 40 IU daily over 24 weeks
51
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo
Intranasal sterile saline once daily over 24 weeks Placebo: Intranasal sterile saline 40 IU daily over 24 weeks
55
Control - Insulin
40 IU of regular human insulin once daily over 24 weeks Regular Human Insulin: Regular human insulin 40 IU daily over 24 weeks
58
Control - Placebo
Intranasal sterile saline once daily over 24 weeks Placebo: Intranasal sterile saline 40 IU daily over 24 weeks
59
Total223

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event3424
Overall StudyCensored - study completion4510
Overall StudyFamily-related issues0001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4541
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1312
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1341412

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalType 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboControl - InsulinType 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinControl - Placebo
Age, Continuous65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants6 Participants1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
210 Participants49 Participants57 Participants48 Participants56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
34 Participants16 Participants4 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants4 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
173 Participants34 Participants52 Participants36 Participants51 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
223 participants55 participants58 participants51 participants59 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
109 Participants25 Participants29 Participants24 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
114 Participants30 Participants29 Participants27 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 510 / 550 / 580 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 5137 / 5533 / 5833 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 511 / 552 / 583 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Executive Function Composite z Score

The executive function composite score was calculated as a sum of Paired Associates Learning (PAL) and Spatial Working Memory (SWM) z-scores (range -2 to +2, 0 indicates the mean; higher score indicates worse outcome). Paired Associates Learning - raw score of Total Errors Adjusted (range 0-120) was converted to z-score. Spatial Working Memory - raw score SWM-Between Errors (range 0-42) and raw score of SWM-Strategy (range 8-56) were converted to z-scores. Executive function composite scores were compared between: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Time frame: Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).

Population: Intention-to-treat analyses (Model 1) included data from 223 randomized subjects who completed the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinExecutive Function Composite z ScoreBaseline0.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinExecutive Function Composite z ScorePost-treatment average-0.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinExecutive Function Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboExecutive Function Composite z ScoreBaseline1.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboExecutive Function Composite z ScorePost-treatment average-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboExecutive Function Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average0.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Control - InsulinExecutive Function Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average-0.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Control - InsulinExecutive Function Composite z ScoreBaseline0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Control - InsulinExecutive Function Composite z ScorePost-treatment average-1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Control - PlaceboExecutive Function Composite z ScoreBaseline0.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Control - PlaceboExecutive Function Composite z ScorePost-treatment average-0.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Control - PlaceboExecutive Function Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.14495% CI: [-0.87, 0.13]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.00895% CI: [-1.11, -0.16]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Gait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).

Gait speed dual-task (cm/s) - walking and counting backwards (subtracting 7) difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Time frame: Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).

Population: Intention-to-treat analyses (Model 1) included data from 223 randomized subjects who completed the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Post-treatment average108.77 cm/sStandard Deviation 20.49
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).On-treatment average105.34 cm/sStandard Deviation 23.59
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Baseline104.23 cm/sStandard Deviation 23.3
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).On-treatment average98.27 cm/sStandard Deviation 22.39
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Baseline93.18 cm/sStandard Deviation 22.71
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Post-treatment average102.22 cm/sStandard Deviation 21.02
Control - InsulinGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Baseline109.44 cm/sStandard Deviation 24.4
Control - InsulinGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).On-treatment average114.66 cm/sStandard Deviation 25.11
Control - InsulinGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Post-treatment average117.29 cm/sStandard Deviation 26.73
Control - PlaceboGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).On-treatment average112.58 cm/sStandard Deviation 17.99
Control - PlaceboGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Post-treatment average113.08 cm/sStandard Deviation 20.6
Control - PlaceboGait Speed Dual-task (cm/s).Baseline110.24 cm/sStandard Deviation 16.5
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [2.33, 14.29]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.34295% CI: [-2.9, 8.32]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Gait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).

Gait speed normal walk (cm/s) - difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Time frame: Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).

Population: Intention-to-treat analyses (Model 1) included data from 223 randomized subjects who completed the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Post-treatment average113.12 cm/sStandard Deviation 19.6
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).On-treatment average112.43 cm/sStandard Deviation 22.03
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Baseline112.23 cm/sStandard Deviation 22.94
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Post-treatment average107.27 cm/sStandard Deviation 23.16
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).On-treatment average105.83 cm/sStandard Deviation 21.27
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Baseline103.42 cm/sStandard Deviation 21.04
Control - InsulinGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Baseline121.58 cm/sStandard Deviation 21.87
Control - InsulinGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).On-treatment average123.89 cm/sStandard Deviation 23.36
Control - InsulinGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Post-treatment average124.79 cm/sStandard Deviation 24.75
Control - PlaceboGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Post-treatment average120.50 cm/sStandard Deviation 19.33
Control - PlaceboGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).On-treatment average119.44 cm/sStandard Deviation 18.6
Control - PlaceboGait Speed Normal Walk (cm/s).Baseline119.51 cm/sStandard Deviation 15.61
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.02595% CI: [0.81, 12.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.05195% CI: [-0.03, 10.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Verbal Memory Composite z Score

Verbal memory composite score was calculated as the sum of Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) z scores ( 0 indicates the mean; lower score indicates worse outcome). VRM- Free Recall raw score (range 0-12), immediate and delayed VRM-Recognition raw score (range 0-24) were converted to z-scores. Verbal memory composite scores were compared between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Time frame: Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).

Population: Intention-to-treat analyses (Model 1) included data from 223 randomized subjects who completed the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinVerbal Memory Composite z ScorePost-treatment average0.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreBaseline-0.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreBaseline-0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboVerbal Memory Composite z ScorePost-treatment average-0.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Control - InsulinVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average0.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Control - InsulinVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreBaseline0.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Control - InsulinVerbal Memory Composite z ScorePost-treatment average1.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Control - PlaceboVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreBaseline-0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Control - PlaceboVerbal Memory Composite z ScorePost-treatment average0.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Control - PlaceboVerbal Memory Composite z ScoreOn-treatment average-0.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.14995% CI: [-0.13, 0.83]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: We set type-I error rate at 0.05, power of 0.80 or above, effect size of 15% improvement due to INI, and obtained n=120 for the DM group (60 DM-INI; 60 DM-Placebo) and n=90 for the Control group (45 Control-INI; 45 Control-Placebo) yielding 210 patients with data at the end of the treatment period.p-value: 0.13495% CI: [-0.11, 0.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).

Long-term safety measure of fasting plasma glucose difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Time frame: Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).

Population: Intention-to-treat analyses (Model 1) included data from 223 randomized subjects who completed the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Baseline138.63 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44.6
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Post-treatment average143.28 mg/dLStandard Deviation 51.69
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).On-treatment average140.47 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44.71
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Baseline141.25 mg/dLStandard Deviation 51.15
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Post-treatment average140.34 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.49
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).On-treatment average132.18 mg/dLStandard Deviation 39.45
Control - InsulinFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).On-treatment average90.11 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.97
Control - InsulinFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Baseline92.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.72
Control - InsulinFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Post-treatment average90.05 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.62
Control - PlaceboFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Baseline90.54 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.71
Control - PlaceboFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).Post-treatment average91.94 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.56
Control - PlaceboFasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL).On-treatment average89.61 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.33
p-value: 0.0395% CI: [1, 19.58]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: See primary aims.p-value: 0.60795% CI: [-6.22, 10.63]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Weight (kg).

Long-term safety measure of weight difference between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo, Control - Insulin vs. Control - Placebo.

Time frame: Measured at baseline, on-treatment (V2-intervention week 1, V4 week 8, V6 week 16, V8 week 24) and post-treatment (V9-week 25, V10-week 32, V11-week 40, V12-week 48).

Population: Intention-to-treat analyses (Model 1) included data from 223 randomized subjects who completed the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinWeight (kg).Baseline90.36 kgStandard Deviation 21.8
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinWeight (kg).On-treatment average88.44 kgStandard Deviation 19.75
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinWeight (kg).Post-treatment average90.41 kgStandard Deviation 19.82
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboWeight (kg).On-treatment average93.79 kgStandard Deviation 18.5
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboWeight (kg).Post-treatment average92.59 kgStandard Deviation 19.23
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboWeight (kg).Baseline90.96 kgStandard Deviation 20.03
Control - InsulinWeight (kg).Baseline75.89 kgStandard Deviation 14.19
Control - InsulinWeight (kg).Post-treatment average76.15 kgStandard Deviation 13.58
Control - InsulinWeight (kg).On-treatment average75.97 kgStandard Deviation 13.43
Control - PlaceboWeight (kg).Baseline76.40 kgStandard Deviation 17.76
Control - PlaceboWeight (kg).Post-treatment average78.18 kgStandard Deviation 19.21
Control - PlaceboWeight (kg).On-treatment average77.14 kgStandard Deviation 18.34
Comparison: See primary aims.p-value: 0.57695% CI: [-9.5, 5.29]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: See primary aims.p-value: 0.80295% CI: [-7.58, 5.87]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Cerebral Blood Flow on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Difference in regional cerebral blood flow in right medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) was measured by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) MRI at 3 Tesla in 8 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin participants and 3 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo participants only.

Time frame: At baseline and at V8 (week 24) the last intervention.

Population: MRI at 3 Tesla performed in 8 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Insulin participants and 3 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Placebo participants only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinCerebral Blood Flow on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).Baseline86.40 50ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 6.71
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - InsulinCerebral Blood Flow on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).End of treatment92.68 50ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 6.77
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboCerebral Blood Flow on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).Baseline95.23 50ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 0.52
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - PlaceboCerebral Blood Flow on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).End of treatment92.73 50ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 0.98
p-value: 0.03Voxel-Based Morphometry

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026