Skip to content

Evaluation of Dupilumab in Patients With Persistent Asthma (Liberty Asthma Quest)

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Persistent Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02414854
Enrollment
1902
Registered
2015-04-13
Start date
2015-04-27
Completion date
2017-11-23
Last updated
2018-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab (SAR231893 / REGN668) in participants with persistent asthma. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab. * To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on improving participant-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life. * To evaluate dupilumab systemic exposure and incidence of anti-drug antibodies.

Detailed description

The total duration of study period for each participant is 67 to 69 weeks, including a screening period of 3 to 5 weeks, treatment period of 52 weeks, and post-treatment follow-up period of 12 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGDupilumab

Solution for injection, Subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, upper thigh or upper arm.

DRUGPlacebo

Solution for injection, Subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, upper thigh or upper arm.

Oral inhalation, stable dose (medium or high dose) of ICS in combination with up to 2 other controller medicines (second or third controller therapy)

DRUGAlbuterol/Salbutamol

Oral inhalation as needed

Oral inhalation as needed

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Adults and adolescent participants with a physician diagnosis of asthma for ≥12 months, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2014 Guidelines and the following criteria: a) Existing treatment with medium to high dose ICS (≥250 mcg of fluticasone propionate twice daily or equipotent ICS daily dosage to a maximum of 2000 mcg/day of fluticasone propionate or equivalent) in combination with a second controller (eg, long-acting beta agonist, leukotriene receptor antagonist) for at least 3 months with a stable dose ≥1 month prior to Visit 1. i) Note for Japan: for participants aged 18 years and older, ICS must be on ≥200 mcg of fluticasone propionate twice daily or equivalent; for participants aged 12 to 17 years, ICS must be ≥100 mcg of fluticasone propionate twice daily or equivalent). ii) Participants requiring a third controller for their asthma will be considered eligible for this study, and it should also be used for at least 3 months with a stable dose ≥1 month prior to Visit 1.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants \<12 years of age or the minimum legal age for adolescents in the country of the investigative site, whichever is higher (For those countries where local regulations permit enrollment of adults only, participant recruitment will be restricted to those who are ≥18 years of age). * Weight is less than 30 kilograms. * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other lung diseases (eg, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, Churg-Strauss Syndrome, etc) which may impair lung function. * A participant who experiences a severe asthma exacerbation (defined as a deterioration of asthma that results in emergency treatment, hospitalization due to asthma, or treatment with systemic steroids at any time from 1 month prior to the Screening Visit up to and including the Baseline Visit). * Evidence of lung disease(s) other than asthma, either clinical evidence or imaging (Chest X-ray, CT, MRI) within 12 months of Visit 1 or at the screening visit, as per local standard of care. * Note for Japan: According to the request from the health authority, chest X-ray should be performed at screening visit if there is no chest imaging (Chest X-ray, computed tomography \[CT\], magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) available within 3 months prior to screening to exclude participants with suspected active or untreated latent tuberculosis. * Current smoker or cessation of smoking within 6 months prior to Visit 1. * Previous smoker with a smoking history \>10 pack-years. * Comorbid disease that might interfere with the evaluation of Investigational Medicinal Product. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationBaseline to Week 52A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline to Week 52A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/LBaseline to Week 52A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at BaselineBaseline to Week 52A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/LBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at BaselineBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 24The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline, Week 24The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 24The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.
Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 52A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations (resulted hospitalization or emergency room visit) that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at BaselineBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52FVC is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness. FVC is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52FEF is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. FEF25-75% is defined as the mean forced expiratory flow between the 25% and 75% of the FVC.
Change From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Annualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 52LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in ICS \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Time to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 52The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as follows: date of the first event - randomization date +1. For participants who had no event on or before Visit 18 (Week 52) or last contact date, the time was censored at the date of Visit 18 or the last contact date, whichever was earlier. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated; therefore, the probability of severe exacerbation at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52, are presented as the descriptive statistics.
Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 52The time to first LOAC event was defined as follows: date of the first event - first dose date +1. For participants who had no event on or before last dose date + 14 days or last contact date, the time was censored at the last dose date + 14 days or the last contact date, whichever was earlier.
Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52The ACQ-7 has 7 questions, the first 5 questions assess the most common asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze plus short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1 (pre-bronchodilator % predicted). Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). Clinic staff scored the FEV1% predicted on a 7-point scale. The questions were equally weighted and the ACQ-7 total score was mean of the scores of all 7 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0= No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.
Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.
Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52Participants recorded every morning on awakening the number of asthma-related nocturnal awakenings requiring use of rescue medication that occurred during the previous night.
Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded daily by the participants in an electronic diary/peak expiratory flow (PEF) meter. In the case that Nebulizer solutions were used as an alternative delivery method, the nebulizer dose was converted to number of puffs as per following conversion factor: salbutamol/albuterol nebulizer solution (2.5 mg) corresponds to 4 puffs.
Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 12, 36, and 52The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L-VAS records participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable).
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52The HADS is a general scale to detect states of anxiety and depression already used and validated in asthma, which includes HADS-A and HADS-D subscales. The instrument is comprised of 14 items: 7 related to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 to depression (HADS-D). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3. The anxiety/depression score is the sum of the scores of the 7 related items; one can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. And the total score is the sum of the scores of the 14 items ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating higher anxiety/depression complains.
Change From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52The SNOT-22 is a validated measure of health related quality of life in sinonasal disease. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0-5. The total score may range from 0 (no disease) -110 (worst disease), lower scores represent better health related quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52RQLQ(S)+12 is a self-administered questionnaire with standardized activities developed to measure health-related quality of life signs and symptoms that are most problematic in those 12 to 75 years of age, as a result of perennial or seasonal allergic rhinitis. There are 28 items on RQLQ(S) in 7 domains: activities (3 items), sleep (3 items), non-nose/eye symptoms (7 items), practical problems (3 items), nasal symptoms (4 items), eye symptoms (4 items) and emotional (4 items). RQLQ(S)+12 responses are based on 7-point likert scale with responses ranging from 0 (not troubled) to 6 (extremely troubled). Individual items within RQLQ(S)+12 are equally weighted. The overall score is calculated as the mean score of all items. Higher scores indicated more health-related quality of life impairment (lower scores better).
Change From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52The PEF is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter. Peak flow testing for PEF was performed at home (morning and evening) while sitting or standing prior to using any medication (if needed) for asthma.
Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LBaseline to Week 52A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

4148 participants were screened from Apr 2015-Sep 2016. 1902 were randomized at 321 centers/22 countries. 2246 were screen failures. 1897 participants were treated; some received a different treatment than that assigned at randomization and for adverse event (AE) analysis were allocated to treatment actually received (see footnotes in below table)

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified by age (\<18 years, \>=18 years), blood eosinophil count(\<0.3 Giga/L, \>=0.3 Giga/L), ICS dose level (medium, high), and country. Assignment to arms was done centrally using Interactive Voice/Web Response System in 2:2:1:1 ratio to Dupilumab 200 mg q2w, Dupilumab 300 mg q2w, Placebo (for 200 mg)q2w, Placebo (for 300 mg)q2w

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2w
2 subcutaneous injections of matched Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by a single injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 50 in combination with stable ICS and up to 2 other controller medicines (second or third controller therapy). Albuterol/salbutamol or levalbuterol/levosalbutamol was given as reliever medication.
317
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w
2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by a single 200 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 50 in combination with stable ICS and up to 2 other controller medicines (second or third controller therapy). Albuterol/salbutamol or levalbuterol/levosalbutamol was given as reliever medication.
631
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w
2 subcutaneous injections of matched Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by a single injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 50 in combination with stable ICS and up to 2 other controller medicines (second or third controller therapy). Albuterol/salbutamol or levalbuterol/levosalbutamol was given as reliever medication.
321
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w
2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by a single 300 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 50 in combination with stable ICS and up to 2 other controller medicines (second or third controller therapy). Albuterol/salbutamol or levalbuterol/levosalbutamol was given as reliever medication.
633
Total1,902

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event97112
Overall StudyOther than specified above12371737
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol1122

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDupilumab 300 mg q2wTotalDupilumab 200 mg q2wPlacebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPlacebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2w
Age, Continuous47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
Age, Customized
Adolescents (12-17 years)
34 Participants107 Participants34 Participants21 Participants18 Participants
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 years)
516 Participants1544 Participants512 Participants253 Participants263 Participants
Age, Customized
From 65-84 years
83 Participants251 Participants85 Participants43 Participants40 Participants
Blood Eosinophil Group
>=0.15 - <0.3 Giga/L
175 Participants527 Participants173 Participants84 Participants95 Participants
Blood Eosinophil Group
<0.15 Giga/L
181 Participants542 Participants193 Participants85 Participants83 Participants
Blood Eosinophil Group
>=0.3 Giga/L
277 Participants831 Participants264 Participants148 Participants142 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
159 Participants490 Participants171 Participants81 Participants79 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
474 Participants1412 Participants460 Participants236 Participants242 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
ICS Dose Level
High
323 Participants979 Participants317 Participants172 Participants167 Participants
ICS Dose Level
Low
7 Participants15 Participants4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
ICS Dose Level
Medium
303 Participants908 Participants310 Participants144 Participants151 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Oriental
79 Participants223 Participants78 Participants33 Participants33 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/of African descent
21 Participants80 Participants33 Participants14 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
529 Participants1577 Participants510 Participants265 Participants273 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants20 Participants9 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
394 Participants1197 Participants387 Participants198 Participants218 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
239 Participants705 Participants244 Participants119 Participants103 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 3131 / 6310 / 3215 / 632
other
Total, other adverse events
185 / 313363 / 631197 / 321378 / 632
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 31351 / 63128 / 32156 / 632

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.76 literStandard Deviation 0.61
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.15 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.92 literStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.78 literStandard Deviation 0.62
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.28 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.07 literStandard Deviation 0.76
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.93 literStandard Deviation 0.68
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.75 literStandard Deviation 0.57
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.18 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.78 literStandard Deviation 0.6
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.31 literStandard Deviation 0.43
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.09 literStandard Deviation 0.7
Comparison: Analysis was performed using mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in FEV1 values up to Week 12 as response variable; and treatment, age, sex, baseline height, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, visit, treatment by-visit interaction, baseline FEV1 value and baseline-by-visit interaction as covariates. Here, it is test no. 2 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.08, 0.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM model with change from baseline in FEV1 values up to Week 12 as response variable; and treatment, age, sex, baseline height, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, visit, treatment by-visit interaction, baseline FEV1 value and baseline-by-visit interaction as covariates. Here, it is test no. 4 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.08, 0.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population that included all randomized population analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population0.871 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population0.456 Exacerbation per participant-year
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population0.970 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population0.524 Exacerbation per participant-year
Comparison: Analysis was performed using negative binomial model with total number of events onset from randomization up to Week 52 or last contact date (whichever comes earlier) as response variable; with 4 treatment groups, age, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, number of severe exacerbation events within 1 year prior to study as covariates; and log transformed standardized observation duration as an offset variable. Here, it is test no. 1 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.43, 0.68]Negative binomial regression model
Comparison: Analysis was performed using negative binomial model with total number of events onset from randomization up to Week 52 or last contact date (whichever comes earlier) as response variable; with 4 treatment groups, age, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, number of severe exacerbation events within 1 year prior to study as covariates; and log transformed standardized observation duration as an offset variable. Here, it is test no. 3 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.413, 0.662]Negative binomial regression model
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed ITT population with baseline eosinophil \>=0.15 Giga/L. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LBaseline1.77 literStandard Deviation 0.63
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LChange at Week 120.17 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LChange at Week 120.34 literStandard Deviation 0.46
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LBaseline1.81 literStandard Deviation 0.63
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LBaseline1.75 literStandard Deviation 0.55
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LChange at Week 120.21 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LBaseline1.79 literStandard Deviation 0.59
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/LChange at Week 120.35 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM model with change from baseline in FEV1 values up to Week 12 as response variable; and treatment, age, sex, baseline height, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, visit, treatment by-visit interaction, baseline FEV1 value and baseline-by-visit interaction as covariates. Here, it is test no. 7 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.09, 0.21]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed ITT population with baseline eosinophil \<0.3 Giga/L. 'Overall number of participants analysed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.12 literStandard Deviation 0.32
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.21 literStandard Deviation 0.43
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.17 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.21 literStandard Deviation 0.41
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed ITT population with baseline eosinophil \>=0.3 Giga/L. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline1.78 literStandard Deviation 0.66
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 120.19 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 120.39 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline1.81 literStandard Deviation 0.64
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline1.73 literStandard Deviation 0.54
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 120.20 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline1.75 literStandard Deviation 0.59
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 120.43 literStandard Deviation 0.43
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM model with change from baseline in FEV1 values up to Week 12 as response variable; and treatment, age, sex, baseline height, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, visit, treatment by-visit interaction, baseline FEV1 value and baseline-by-visit interaction as covariates. Here, it is test no. 9 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.16, 0.32]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with high dose ICS at baseline. 'Overall number of participants analysed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline0.14 literStandard Deviation 0.34
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline0.27 literStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline0.20 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline0.32 literStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.08 literStandard Deviation 0.35
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.13 literStandard Deviation 0.35
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.15 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.13 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.14 literStandard Deviation 0.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.12 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.31 literStandard Deviation 0.5
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.31 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.22 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.28 literStandard Deviation 0.42
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.24 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.31 literStandard Deviation 0.48
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.13 literStandard Deviation 0.34
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.19 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.19 literStandard Deviation 0.44
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.20 literStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.21 literStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.10 literStandard Deviation 0.34
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.32 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.32 literStandard Deviation 0.44
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.27 literStandard Deviation 0.41
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.30 literStandard Deviation 0.44
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.25 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.29 literStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in ICS \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population2.972 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population1.853 LOAC per participant-year
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population2.965 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) Event During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population1.740 LOAC per participant-year
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed ITT population with baseline eosinophil \>=0.15 Giga/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L1.007 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L0.445 Exacerbation per participant-year
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L1.081 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L0.434 Exacerbation per participant-year
Comparison: Analysis was performed using negative binomial model with total number of events onset from randomization up to Week 52 or last contact date (whichever comes earlier) as response variable; with 4 treatment groups, age, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, number of severe exacerbation events within 1 year prior to study as covariates; and log transformed standardized observation duration as an offset variable. Here, it is test no. 6 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.307, 0.526]Negative binomial regression model
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with baseline eosinophil \<0.3 Giga/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.675 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.512 Exacerbation per participant-year
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.732 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil <0.3 Giga/L0.610 Exacerbation per participant-year
Comparison: Analysis was performed using negative binomial model with total number of events onset from randomization up to Week 52 or last contact date (whichever comes earlier) as response variable; with 4 treatment groups, age, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, number of severe exacerbation events within 1 year prior to study as covariates; and log transformed standardized observation duration as an offset variable. Here, it is test no. 10 of testing order.p-value: 0.259995% CI: [0.608, 1.144]Negative binomial regression model
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with baseline eosinophil \>=0.3 Giga/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L1.081 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L0.370 Exacerbation per participant-year
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L1.236 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L0.403 Exacerbation per participant-year
Comparison: Analysis was performed using negative binomial model with total number of events onset from randomization up to Week 52 or last contact date (whichever comes earlier) as response variable; with 4 treatment groups, age, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, number of severe exacerbation events within 1 year prior to study as covariates; and log transformed standardized observation duration as an offset variable. Here, it is test no. 8 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.234, 0.454]Negative binomial regression model
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with high dose ICS at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline1.040 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline0.560 Exacerbation per participant-year
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline1.038 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline0.639 Exacerbation per participant-year
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations (resulted hospitalization or emergency room visit) that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population0.081 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population0.043 Exacerbation per participant-year
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population0.034 Exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Rate of Severe Exacerbation Events Resulting in Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population0.025 Exacerbation per participant-year
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The SNOT-22 is a validated measure of health related quality of life in sinonasal disease. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0-5. The total score may range from 0 (no disease) -110 (worst disease), lower scores represent better health related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with bilateral nasal polyposis/chronic rhinosinusitis. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 12-6.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.19
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 24-7.21 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 36-6.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.03
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 52-6.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 52-15.78 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.72
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 36-15.23 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 24-14.68 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.77
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 12-13.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.85
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 36-8.51 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 52-9.98 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.01
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 24-9.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.04
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 12-11.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.11
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 52-19.81 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 12-16.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.54
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 24-17.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.81
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in 22-Item Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis/Chronic RhinosinusitisChange at Week 36-18.86 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.34
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.21 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.94 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.98 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.26 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.77 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.58 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.89 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.06 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with baseline eosinophil \>=0.3 Giga/L. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline4.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 240.97 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 241.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline4.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline4.21 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 241.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LBaseline4.36 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self- Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/LChange at Week 241.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 521.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 361.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 121.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 521.28 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 361.26 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 361.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.94 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 521.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 121.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 521.34 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ (S) Self-Administered Global Score at Weeks 12, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 361.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.06 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 241.67 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline2.71 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 241.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline2.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.43 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline2.77 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 241.58 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.19 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 241.37 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline2.77 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The ACQ-7 has 7 questions, the first 5 questions assess the most common asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze plus short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1 (pre-bronchodilator % predicted). Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). Clinic staff scored the FEV1% predicted on a 7-point scale. The questions were equally weighted and the ACQ-7 total score was mean of the scores of all 7 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.46 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.04 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.89 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.65 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.91 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.81 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.85 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.32 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.32 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.94 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.79 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.92 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.65 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.01 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.12 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.34 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.97 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7-item Version (ACQ-7) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.20 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline4.26 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 245.23 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline4.31 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 241.13 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 245.46 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 245.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline4.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 241.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline4.28 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationChange at Week 241.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ [S]) Self-Administered Global Score at Week 24: ITT PopulationWeek 245.47 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L-VAS records participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 369.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.24
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 528.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.51
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 360.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 520.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 120.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 127.69 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.43
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 248.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.58
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 240.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 1211.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 3611.61 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.09
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 520.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 240.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 2411.44 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.48
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 5212.98 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.71
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 360.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 120.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 240.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 360.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 120.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 126.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 520.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 248.59 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.37
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 369.31 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.09
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 529.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.81
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 5211.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 120.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 240.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 360.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationSingle Index: Change at Week 520.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 249.21 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.61
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 3611.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Scores at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationVAS Score: Change at Week 129.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.26 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.57 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.27 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.06 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.14 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.36 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.61 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.46 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEF is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. FEF25-75% is defined as the mean forced expiratory flow between the 25% and 75% of the FVC.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.16 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.45
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.16 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.18 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.45
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.09 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.17 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.47
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.18 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.46
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.18 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.49
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.34 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.57
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.36 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.63
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.35 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.59
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.24 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.48
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.29 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.22 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.47
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.30 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.53
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.22 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.49
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.24 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.55
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.22 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.56
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.19 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.15 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.44
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.11 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.44
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.20 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.49
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.36 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.55
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.36 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.56
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.27 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.48
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.29 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.48
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.32 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.51
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.35 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.53
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.35 liters/secStandard Deviation 0.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FVC is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness. FVC is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.08 literStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.11 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.13 literStandard Deviation 0.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.13 literStandard Deviation 0.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.11 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.12 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.08 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.28 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.30 literStandard Deviation 0.52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.29 literStandard Deviation 0.49
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.23 literStandard Deviation 0.44
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.26 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.29 literStandard Deviation 0.53
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.29 literStandard Deviation 0.48
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.18 literStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.12 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.18 literStandard Deviation 0.46
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.10 literStandard Deviation 0.37
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.18 literStandard Deviation 0.44
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.19 literStandard Deviation 0.47
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.18 literStandard Deviation 0.45
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.29 literStandard Deviation 0.5
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.31 literStandard Deviation 0.5
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.31 literStandard Deviation 0.52
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.25 literStandard Deviation 0.46
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.27 literStandard Deviation 0.47
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.29 literStandard Deviation 0.51
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.29 literStandard Deviation 0.51
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The HADS is a general scale to detect states of anxiety and depression already used and validated in asthma, which includes HADS-A and HADS-D subscales. The instrument is comprised of 14 items: 7 related to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 to depression (HADS-D). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3. The anxiety/depression score is the sum of the scores of the 7 related items; one can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. And the total score is the sum of the scores of the 14 items ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating higher anxiety/depression complains.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population; 29 participants in Japan who received an incorrectly translated HADS questionnaire were excluded. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.29
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-2.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.71
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-2.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-2.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.29
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.93 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.97
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-2.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-2.36 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.28
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.91 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.65
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-2.67 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.86 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.79
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.11
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-2.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.04
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.98 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-2.13 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.67
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

The PEF is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter. Peak flow testing for PEF was performed at home (morning and evening) while sitting or standing prior to using any medication (if needed) for asthma.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 129.85 liters/minStandard Deviation 50.4
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 123.24 liters/minStandard Deviation 53.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 24.19 liters/minStandard Deviation 31.3
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 82.82 liters/minStandard Deviation 50.1
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 245.55 liters/minStandard Deviation 53.27
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 87.42 liters/minStandard Deviation 49.3
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 52-6.43 liters/minStandard Deviation 62.82
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 24-4.89 liters/minStandard Deviation 55.07
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 363.24 liters/minStandard Deviation 61.68
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 23.33 liters/minStandard Deviation 36.81
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 46.23 liters/minStandard Deviation 42.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 45.01 liters/minStandard Deviation 45.09
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 522.85 liters/minStandard Deviation 64.6
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 36-6.75 liters/minStandard Deviation 62.44
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 5229.86 liters/minStandard Deviation 75.44
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 213.80 liters/minStandard Deviation 40.59
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 821.06 liters/minStandard Deviation 61.8
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 417.94 liters/minStandard Deviation 55.3
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 3621.79 liters/minStandard Deviation 75
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 825.70 liters/minStandard Deviation 58.52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 215.21 liters/minStandard Deviation 39.45
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 1227.81 liters/minStandard Deviation 65.3
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 5218.77 liters/minStandard Deviation 77.37
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 2419.95 liters/minStandard Deviation 71.5
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 2428.71 liters/minStandard Deviation 69.64
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 3631.19 liters/minStandard Deviation 71.59
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 1219.75 liters/minStandard Deviation 68.14
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 421.81 liters/minStandard Deviation 53.85
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 5210.99 liters/minStandard Deviation 64.68
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 23.45 liters/minStandard Deviation 28.95
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 45.55 liters/minStandard Deviation 43.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 812.22 liters/minStandard Deviation 50.5
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 1214.23 liters/minStandard Deviation 56.18
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 2415.43 liters/minStandard Deviation 60.83
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 3612.57 liters/minStandard Deviation 61.88
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 128.52 liters/minStandard Deviation 56.74
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 23.87 liters/minStandard Deviation 33.98
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 42.73 liters/minStandard Deviation 46.83
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 87.68 liters/minStandard Deviation 56.73
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 247.56 liters/minStandard Deviation 63.25
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 362.64 liters/minStandard Deviation 65.21
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 522.83 liters/minStandard Deviation 67.01
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 5226.67 liters/minStandard Deviation 71.63
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 3623.93 liters/minStandard Deviation 65.04
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 2423.74 liters/minStandard Deviation 63.71
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 1225.88 liters/minStandard Deviation 57.09
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 1218.70 liters/minStandard Deviation 55.6
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 2415.82 liters/minStandard Deviation 61.91
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 823.18 liters/minStandard Deviation 52.65
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 419.67 liters/minStandard Deviation 46.47
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 5215.58 liters/minStandard Deviation 72.51
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 3614.35 liters/minStandard Deviation 64.66
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 414.90 liters/minStandard Deviation 47.42
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 211.35 liters/minStandard Deviation 36.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationAM: Change at Week 214.46 liters/minStandard Deviation 36.29
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationPM: Change at Week 817.26 liters/minStandard Deviation 53.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0= No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.26 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.54 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.26 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.18 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.36 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.37 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.27 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.15 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.44 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Participants recorded every morning on awakening the number of asthma-related nocturnal awakenings requiring use of rescue medication that occurred during the previous night.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.25 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.74
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.24 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.18 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.65
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.10 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.61
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.06 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.49
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.23 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.78
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.21 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.66
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.15 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.55
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.35 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.88
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.36 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.19 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.66
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.33 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.75
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.29 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.72
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.34 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.81
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.26 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.74
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.04 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.62
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.11 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.17 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.62
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.18 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.67
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.26 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.65
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.26 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.71
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.28 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.73
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.24 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.72
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.41 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.36 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.74
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.20 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.67
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.11 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.67
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Awakenings Per Night at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.30 number of nocturnal awakenings/nightStandard Deviation 0.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded daily by the participants in an electronic diary/peak expiratory flow (PEF) meter. In the case that Nebulizer solutions were used as an alternative delivery method, the nebulizer dose was converted to number of puffs as per following conversion factor: salbutamol/albuterol nebulizer solution (2.5 mg) corresponds to 4 puffs.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.52 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.28
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.77 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.6
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.21 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 1.55
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.90 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.58
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.99 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.49
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.50 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.23
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.26 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.19
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.30 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.99
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.27 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.05
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.02 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.86
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.45 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.33
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.68 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.61
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.56 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 1.96
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.23 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.03
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.99 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.21
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.06 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.57
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.12 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.64
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.10 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 1.71
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.34 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.42
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.65 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.96
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.89 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.73 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.42
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.47 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 1.91
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-1.15 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.83
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.08 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.72
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-1.39 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.97
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-1.23 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 3.01
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Daily Reliever Medication Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.94 Number of puffs of reliever medicationStandard Deviation 2.86
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 365.09 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.99
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 244.38 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.85
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 524.25 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.06
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 44.55 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 11.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 22.58 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 11.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 84.93 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.3
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 125.02 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.1
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 249.98 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 13.94
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 47.92 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.81
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 89.27 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 13.13
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 27.10 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.28
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3610.12 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.61
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 129.22 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 13.87
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 5210.08 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.79
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 526.68 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 13.56
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 366.82 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 13.54
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 44.13 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 11.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 246.41 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.02
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 23.32 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 10.98
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 125.90 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 13.02
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 86.08 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 12.55
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 5211.02 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.59
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 1210.28 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.44
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 28.44 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 13.2
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 49.20 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 89.70 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.15
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2410.14 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 14.75
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3610.94 percent predicted of FEV1Standard Deviation 15.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.02 literStandard Deviation 0.31
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.05 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.02 literStandard Deviation 0.31
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 36-0.03 literStandard Deviation 0.34
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.08 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.02 literStandard Deviation 0.33
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.07 literStandard Deviation 0.31
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.10 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.12 literStandard Deviation 0.44
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.12 literStandard Deviation 0.44
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.10 literStandard Deviation 0.37
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.13 literStandard Deviation 0.43
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.12 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.12 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.01 literStandard Deviation 0.35
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.03 literStandard Deviation 0.35
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 24-0.01 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.01 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.04 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 52-0.02 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.04 literStandard Deviation 0.33
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 520.11 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 20.09 literStandard Deviation 0.34
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 40.10 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 80.11 literStandard Deviation 0.37
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 240.10 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 360.11 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.11 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic Rhinitis

RQLQ(S)+12 is a self-administered questionnaire with standardized activities developed to measure health-related quality of life signs and symptoms that are most problematic in those 12 to 75 years of age, as a result of perennial or seasonal allergic rhinitis. There are 28 items on RQLQ(S) in 7 domains: activities (3 items), sleep (3 items), non-nose/eye symptoms (7 items), practical problems (3 items), nasal symptoms (4 items), eye symptoms (4 items) and emotional (4 items). RQLQ(S)+12 responses are based on 7-point likert scale with responses ranging from 0 (not troubled) to 6 (extremely troubled). Individual items within RQLQ(S)+12 are equally weighted. The overall score is calculated as the mean score of all items. Higher scores indicated more health-related quality of life impairment (lower scores better).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with comorbid allergic rhinitis. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 12-0.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 24-0.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 36-0.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 52-0.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 24-0.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 36-0.78 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 52-0.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 12-0.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 36-0.58 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 24-0.54 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 52-0.47 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 12-0.44 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 52-0.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 24-0.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 12-0.64 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire, Ages 12+ (RQLQ[S]+12) Score at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population With Comorbid Allergic RhinitisChange at Week 36-0.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. 'Overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population10.16 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.88
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population18.74 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.86
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population11.87 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population20.89 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.14
Comparison: Analysis performed using MMRM model(n=954 for 300 vs placebo)with percent change from baseline in FEV1 values up to Week 12 as response variable; \& treatment, age, sex, baseline height, region, baseline eosinophil strata, baseline ICS dose level, visit, treatment by-visit interaction, baseline FEV1 value \& baseline-by-visit interaction as covariates. Hierarchical testing procedure used to control type I error \& handle multiple secondary endpoint analyses. Here, it is test no. 5 of testing order.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.74, 13.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with baseline eosinophil \>=0.15 Giga/L. 'Overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L11.43 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.71
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L22.04 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.96
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L13.49 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.18
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.15 Giga/L24.04 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.71
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with baseline eosinophil \>=0.3 Giga/L. 'Overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L13.40 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.01
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L26.41 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L13.05 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.27
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With Baseline Eosinophil >=0.3 Giga/L30.58 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.22
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population with high dose ICS at baseline. 'Overall number of participants analysed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline8.47 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.94
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline17.99 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.43
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline13.22 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.52
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population With High Dose ICS at Baseline23.41 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.26
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 25.78 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.36
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 49.61 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.54
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 810.27 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.6
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 249.42 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.76
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3610.57 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.41
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 528.37 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.59
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 5219.96 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.35
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2419.76 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.64
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 214.32 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.55
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 818.81 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.8
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 416.11 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.12
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3619.92 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.26
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 48.67 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.55
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 812.24 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.78
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2412.86 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.14
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 5212.89 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.7
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3613.45 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.69
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 26.60 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.84
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3622.08 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.93
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 5221.57 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.08
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 418.77 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.73
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2420.75 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.35
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 217.38 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.82
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, 36, and 52: ITT PopulationChange at Week 819.85 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.63
Secondary

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

The time to first LOAC event was defined as follows: date of the first event - first dose date +1. For participants who had no event on or before last dose date + 14 days or last contact date, the time was censored at the last dose date + 14 days or the last contact date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population110.0 days
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population230.0 days
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population102.0 days
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population264.0 days
Secondary

Time to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT Population

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as follows: date of the first event - randomization date +1. For participants who had no event on or before Visit 18 (Week 52) or last contact date, the time was censored at the date of Visit 18 or the last contact date, whichever was earlier. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated; therefore, the probability of severe exacerbation at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52, are presented as the descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.165 probability of severe exacerbation
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.275 probability of severe exacerbation
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 360.364 probability of severe exacerbation
Placebo (for Dupilumab 200 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 520.434 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.177 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 360.235 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 520.295 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.094 probability of severe exacerbation
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 360.376 probability of severe exacerbation
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.297 probability of severe exacerbation
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 520.437 probability of severe exacerbation
Placebo (for Dupilumab 300 mg) q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.193 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 520.325 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.211 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.137 probability of severe exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates During The 52-Week Treatment Period: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 360.268 probability of severe exacerbation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026