Skip to content

Using a Systematic Review in Clinical Decision Making: a Pilot Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

Using a Systematic Review in Clinical Decision Making: a Pilot Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02414360
Enrollment
56
Registered
2015-04-10
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2015-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Evidence-Based Medicine

Keywords

Review Literature as Topic

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of running a full-scale trial that compares two formats of a shortened systematic review to a full-length systematic review to be used in clinical decision-making.

Detailed description

Two shortened systematic review formats were developed to enhance their use in clinical decision making. An online randomized controlled trial is planned to make comparisons of the shortened formats to a full-length systematic review. To prepare for the full-scale trial, a pilot study will be conducted to test methods and procedures in order to refine the processes.

Interventions

OTHERShortened Format

Shortened format of a systematic review

OTHERFull Length

Full length systematic review

Sponsors

University of Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Physicians who were in practice full- or part-time at study enrollment were recruited for participation * Participants had to have access to the Internet as the study was conducted online.

Exclusion criteria

* The systematic reviews in all formats were only available in English, thus any participants who were not able to read and understand English were not eligible to participate. * Anyone who had taken part in any phase of the development of the shortened versions of the systematic reviews (cased-based or evidence-expertise formats) were not eligible for recruitment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of participant's answers measured using a kappa statistic6 monthsFeasibility of assessing participants' answers
Rate of recruitment6 monthsFeasibility of recruiting participants in a timely manner

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026