Skip to content

McGrath Mac Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Critical Care Unit

McGrath Mac Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Critical Care Unit

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02413723
Acronym
MACMAN
Enrollment
371
Registered
2015-04-10
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intratracheal Intubation in Critical Care

Keywords

intubation, critical care, laryngoscope, videolaryngoscope, intratracheal

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the rate of successful orotracheal intubation at first laryngoscopy will be higher in patients intubated with McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope compared to patients intubated with classical Macintosh laryngoscope in patients requiring an orotracheal intubation in ICU.

Interventions

McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope will be use for first attempt of intratracheal intubation.

DEVICEStandard laryngoscope

Macintosh laryngoscope will be use for first attempt of intratracheal intubation.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Requiring orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to orotracheal intubation * Time too short to allow inclusion and randomisation of patient (particularly cardiac arrest) * Minor (\<18 ) * Pregnant, parturient , or breast-feeding woman * Patient hospitalized without consent and/or deprived of liberty by court's decision * Patient under guardianship or curators * Lack of social insurance * Lack of informed consent * Concomitant inclusion in a trial whose primary endpoint focuses on intubation procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of successful orotracheal intubation at first laryngoscopyintubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutesNumber of successful intubation at first laryngoscopy in one arm/number of included patients in the same arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of successful orotracheal intubation all laryngoscopies pooledintubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutes
Time to successful orotracheal intubationintubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutesDefined by the time between the beginning of induction (injection of anesthetic drugs) and the time of confirmation of the intratracheal nature of the endotracheal tube (defined as apparition of first inflexion on the expired carbon dioxide curve)

Other

MeasureTime frame
Resort to alternative intubation techniqueintubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutes
Frequency of occurence of unexpected eventsDischarge from Intensive Care unit, an expected average of 7 days
Mechanical ventilation durationTime from extubation, an expected average of 6 days
Cormack and Lehane gradeintubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutes
Hospital length of stayDischarge from hospital, an expected average of 14 days
Intensive Care Unit MortalityDischarge from Intensive Care unit, an expected average of 7 days
Mortality at day 28Day 28
Intensive Care Unit length of stayDischarge from Intensive Care unit, an expected average of 7 days
Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scoreintubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutes
Difficult Intubationintubation procedure, an expected average of 15 minutes

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026