Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of IGIV-C in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations

A Multicenter, Prospective, Open-label, Non-controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Immune Globulin (Human), 10% Caprylate/Chromatography Purified (IGIV-C) in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02413580
Enrollment
49
Registered
2015-04-10
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2018-04-30
Last updated
2020-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations

Brief summary

This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C in subjects with MG exacerbations.

Detailed description

The study consisted of a single dose course of IGIV-C treatment followed by 28-days of post-infusion assessments. The total duration of study participation for each subject was up to 28 ± 2 days. Approximately 50 subjects, ages 18 or greater, were planned to be enrolled in the study and receive a single, total dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C over 2 consecutive days (dose of 1 g/kg per day) across multiple centers in Argentina, Canada, Europe, and South Africa.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIGIV-C

An IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered over 2 consecutive days at a dose of 1 g/kg per day.

Sponsors

Grifols Therapeutics LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Was male or female aged ≥18 years. * Subjects must be willing and able to provide written informed consent (if applicable, a legally authorized representative may provide informed consent on behalf of the subject). * Subjects who met the clinical criteria for diagnosis of MG with an exacerbation defined as worsening of MG symptoms as defined by an Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification IVb or V. * Subjects on long-term (8 weeks) corticosteroid treatment for MG. * Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative test for pregnancy (human chorionic gonadotropin \[HCG\]-based assay). * Subjects must be willing to comply with all aspects of the clinical trial protocol, including blood sampling and long-term storage of extra samples, for the entire duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who had received immune globulin treatment given by IV, subcutaneous or intramuscular route within the last 30 days. * Subjects with documentation of a lack of clinical response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy for MG. * Subjects documented positive for antibodies directed against Muscle specific kinase (MuSK). * Subjects with corticosteroid (CS) treatment initiated within the last 8 weeks or modified within the last 2 weeks. * Subjects with plasma exchange (PLEX) within the last 30 days. * Subjects with MG exacerbation attributable to change in medication or infection or evident infection as defined by, but not limited to, the presence of at least one of the following diagnostic features: 1) axillary temperature ≥38°C, 2) positive blood culture of infective microorganism, 3) white blood cell count \>12×10\^9/L and differential white blood cell count of \>10% band neutrophils (\>1.2×10\^9/L), and 4) pulmonary infiltrate with consolidation on chest X-ray. Alternatively, other signs and symptoms may be considered for the diagnosis of evident infection according to the Investigator's judgement. * Subjects with inadequate venous access. * Subjects with a history of anaphylactic reactions or severe reactions to any blood-derived product. * Subjects with a history of intolerance to any component of the investigational products. * Subjects with a documented diagnosis of thrombotic complications to polyclonal IVIG therapy in the past. * Subjects with a history of recent (within the last year) myocardial infarction, stroke or uncontrolled hypertension. * Subjects who suffered from uncontrolled congestive heart failure, embolism or documented electrocardiogram (ECG) changes indicative of myocardial ischemia or atrial fibrillation. * Subjects with current known hyperviscosity or hypercoagulable state. * Subjects currently receiving anti-coagulation therapy. * Subjects with a history of chronic alcoholism or illicit drug abuse (addiction) in the 12 months preceding the Baseline Visit. * Subjects currently receiving, or having received within 3 months prior to the Baseline Visit, any investigational medicinal product or device. * Subjects with a known Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency and anti-IgA serum antibodies. * Subjects with renal impairment (i.e., serum creatinine exceeds more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal \[ULN\] for the expected normal range for the testing laboratory). * Subjects with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels exceeding more than 2.5 times the ULN for the expected normal range for the testing laboratory. * Subjects with haemoglobin levels \<9 g/dL.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreFrom Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14Mean Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG Scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by QMGBaseline (Day 0) to Day 14The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in QMG score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) ScaleBaseline (Day 0) to Day 14The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG-ADL Scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 2-point decrease in the MG-ADL score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG-DAL scale are 0 and 24, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by the MG CompositeBaseline (Day 0) to Day 14The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG Composite scale in the Evaluable population is presented in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in the MG Composite score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG Composite scale are 0 and 50, respectively, with a higher score meaning a worse outcome.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, France, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IGIV-C Treatment
An IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered in subjects with myasthenia gravis exacerbations. IGIV-C: an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C was administered as 2 doses of 1 g/kg on two consecutive days
49
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIGIV-C Treatment
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
40 Participants
Age, Continuous47.3 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.22
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
44 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
4 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
10 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 49
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score

Mean Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG Scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: From Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14

Population: The primary efficacy analysis of change in the score of MG symptoms as measured by the change in QMG score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14 in the Evaluable population which consisted of all subjects who received the entire dose of Investigational Product (2 g/kg over 2 consecutive days) and had valid baseline and Day 14 QMG Score measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IGIV-C TreatmentChange in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score-6.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.15
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-7.957, -4.787]Paired t-test
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale

The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG-ADL Scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 2-point decrease in the MG-ADL score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG-DAL scale are 0 and 24, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14

Population: The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG-ADL in the Evaluable population is presented.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGIV-C TreatmentPercentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale38 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by QMG

The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in QMG score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14

Population: The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the QMG scale in the Evaluable population is presented.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGIV-C TreatmentPercentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by QMG33 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by the MG Composite

The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG Composite scale in the Evaluable population is presented in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in the MG Composite score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG Composite scale are 0 and 50, respectively, with a higher score meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14

Population: The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG Composite scale in the Evaluable population is presented.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGIV-C TreatmentPercentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by the MG Composite37 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026