Skip to content

Augmented Medial Rectus Muscle Recession Versus Posterior Scleral Fixation in Partially Accommodative Esotropia

Augmented Medial Rectus Muscle Recession Versus Medial Rectus Recession With Posterior Scleral Fixation in Partially Accommodative Esotropia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02413463
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-04-10
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2019-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partially Accommodative Esotropia

Brief summary

Prospective randomized interventional comparative study

Detailed description

A prospective controlled interventional study will be performed on patients with partially accommodative esotropia. An informed consent for the surgery will be obtained from all patients. All patients' guardians will receive a thorough explanation of the study design and aims, and sign a written informed consent. An estimation of sample size was performed considering a study power of 0.8 with an alpha error of 0.05 aiming to detect a difference of 5 Δ in the postoperative angle disparity between the 2 groups, assuming a postoperative standard deviation of 6 Δ 9. Based on this estimation, a total of 24 eyes were found to be adequate in each group, and considering a 25% dropout during the follow-up, recruitment of 30 study subjects in each group will be targeted All patients will receive a full ophthalmological assessment including history taking, measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, anterior segment examination, as well as a dilated fundus examination. In addition, all patients will have a detailed motor examination during the initial evaluation and at each follow-up period. The angle of misalignment will be measured by the prism and alternating cover tests for both distance and near with and without glasses. The angle of horizontal misalignment will also be measured in side gazes and in straight up and down gazes. Measurement of the angle of deviation in up and down gazes will be done by tilting the head, approximately 25 degrees down and up respectively, with the patient fixing on a distance target. The difference between the angles of horizontal misalignment in up and down gazes will be used to calculate the amount of pattern strabismus if present. The ductions and versions in all cardinal directions of gaze will be analyzed before surgery and thereafter during the postoperative follow up visits. Underaction will be measured on a 4-point scale ranging from -1 to -4. Similarly overaction will be measured on a 4-point scale ranging from +1 to +4. In all patients cycloplegic refraction will be performed using cyclopentolate 1% eye drops instilled 3 times 10 minutes apart with the last time 30 minutes before refraction. Patients with hypermetropia with a spherical equivalent \>= +1.5 D will then prescribed the full cycloplegic refraction and then re-evaluated with spectacles one month later. Patients who appear to have a partially accommodative esotropia defined as residual esotropia \>8 PD for distance with spectacles will have repeat refraction using atropine 1% drops 3 times a days for 3 days before refraction. After ensuring that full cycloplegic refraction was prescribed, patients will then evaluated with glasses to identify those with partially accommodative esotropia without convergence excess. Patients will be included in the study if the residual distance angle with cycloplegic prescription was \> 15PD. Patients with convergence excess esotropia, defined as the angle of deviation with glasses for near exceeding that for distance by 15 PD or more will be excluded from the study. Amblyopia, defined as a difference of 0.3 logMAR in verbal children (3 lines on the standard logMAR visual acuity chart) or a strong unilateral fixation preference using an accommodative target in infants and preverbal children will be treated before surgery following the standard clinical practice using part-time occlusion and in concordance with the PEDIG guidelines. The smallest angle of deviation will be defined as the corrected angle for distance. The largest angle is defined as the angle for near measured without correction. The angle disparity is defined as the difference between the largest and smallest angles. Patients were randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups. In one group bilateral augmented MR muscle recession will be performed (augmented group). In the other group bilateral MR muscle recession combined with posterior scleral fixation sutures will be performed (Faden group). The surgeries were performed using the same surgical technique. In both groups the medial rectus muscle will be exposed and hooked through a limbal approach. The muscle will then secured with 6-0 polyglactin sutures. In the augmented group, the medial rectus muscles will be recessed using standard tables with the surgical dose targeting the average of the largest and smallest angles. In the Faden group, medial rectus muscle recession will be performed as described above with the surgical dose targeting the smallest pre-operative angle. The muscle will then be fixated to the sclera using 6/0 polyester sutures placed in a mattress like with the anterior and the posterior sutures passing through both the edge of muscle and the sclera 12 mm and 14 mm from the muscle insertion, respectively. Patients will be followed up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. The distance and near angles of deviation, with and without glasses, and the angle disparity were measured at each follow up visit and the ductions and versions will be assessed in all patients. Patients will be considered to have successful outcome if both the distance and near angles with spectacles were less than 8 PD esotropia/phoria. Patients who develop any exophoria/tropia, or in whom hyperopic correction needed to be reduced for treatment of a consecutive exotropia will be considered to be unsuccessful. In addition, patients will be further subdivided into 2 groups according to the preoperative angle disparity into those with angle disparity 20 PD or less and those with angle disparity more than 20 PD. The success rate in each subgroup was calculated. For categorical variables (e.g., gender), percent distribution will be used. For continuous variables (e.g. age, angle of deviation), mean, range and standard deviation will be used. Comparisons between the two groups were done using t-test for independent samples for continuous variables and chi square test for categorical variables. Statistical analysis will be performed with SPSS for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). .

Interventions

PROCEDUREaugmented recession

medial rectus muscle recession using augmented formula ( average of the distance angle with correction and the near angle without correction)

PROCEDUREFaden

medial rectus muscle recession (using the distance angle with correction) with posterior scleral fixation( Faden)

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acquired residual esotropia greater than 14 PD at distance fixation that exists despite full correction of hypermetropic refractive error with the angle of deviation for near not exceeding that of distance by more than 15 PD * Lack of previous extra ocular muscle surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia with convergence excess, non-accommodative esotropia or infantile esotropia * The presence of neurologic, developmental or ocular structural disorders * History of previous eye surgery * Patients requiring simultaneous oblique muscles surgery * Follow up less than 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success Ratesix monthsSuccess rate defined as orthotropia or esotropia ≤ 8 prism diopters with the full hypermetropic correction for near and far without changing the preoperative correction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angle of Deviation With Spectacles for Both Distance and NearSix monthsThe angle of deviation after surgery with full hypermetropic correction
Angle of Deviation Without Spectacles for Both Distance and NearSix monthsThe angle of deviation after surgery without correction for both distance and near
Angle DisparitySix monthsDifference between largest angle and smallest angle
Surgery TimeIntraoperative timeTime to complete the surgery
Number of Patients Who Developed Intraoperative and/or Postoperative ComplicationsSix monthsNumber of patients who developed intraoperative and postoperative complications as scleral perforation, fat prolapse, slipped and lost muscles

Countries

Egypt

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Children with partially accommodative esotropia were recruited from the strabismus clinic of Pediatric Hospital of Cairo University during the period from January 2015 through December 2016. All patients' guardians received a thorough explanation of the study design and aims, and signed a written informed consent.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Augmented Recession
The medial rectus muscle will be exposed and hooked through a limbal approach. The muscle will then be secured with 6-0 polyglactin sutures. The medial rectus muscles will then be recessed using standard tables with the surgical dose targeting the average of the largest and smallest angles augmented recession: medial rectus muscle recession using augmented formula ( average of the distance angle with correction and the near angle without correction)
30
Faden
Medial rectus muscle recession will be performed as described above with the surgical dose targeting the smallest pre-operative angle. The muscle will then fixated to the sclera using 6/0 polyester sutures placed in a mattress like with the anterior and the posterior sutures passing through both the edge of muscle and the sclera 12 mm and 14 mm from the muscle insertion, respectively. Faden: medial rectus muscle recession (using the distance angle with correction) with posterior scleral fixation( Faden)
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAugmented RecessionFadenTotal
Age, Continuous4.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
5.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
4.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
Amblyopia10 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Angle disparity22 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
28 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
25 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Anisometropia11 Participants13 Participants24 Participants
Best-corrected visual acuity0.09 logMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.06
0.11 logMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.06
0.1 logMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.05
Distance angle of deviation without spectacles47 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
43 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
45 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Distance angle of deviation with spectacles26 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
21 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
24 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Near angle of deviation without spectacles50 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
50 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
50 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Near angle of deviation with spectacles29 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
26 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
28 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants16 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Spherical equivalent4.91 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.56
4.43 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74
4.67 Diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Success Rate

Success rate defined as orthotropia or esotropia ≤ 8 prism diopters with the full hypermetropic correction for near and far without changing the preoperative correction.

Time frame: six months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Augmented RecessionSuccess Rate12 Participants
FadenSuccess Rate18 Participants
Comparison: An estimation of sample size was performed considering a study power of 0.8 with an alpha error of 0.05 aiming to detect a difference of 5 Δ in the postoperative angle disparity between the 2 groups, assuming a postoperative standard deviation of 6 Δ. Based on this estimation, a total of 24 eyes were found to be adequate in each group, and considering a 25% dropout during the follow-up, recruitment of 30 study subjects in each group was targetedp-value: 0.18Chi-squared
Secondary

Angle Disparity

Difference between largest angle and smallest angle

Time frame: Six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augmented RecessionAngle Disparity15 DioptersStandard Deviation 3
FadenAngle Disparity10 DioptersStandard Deviation 8
p-value: 0.03t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Angle of Deviation Without Spectacles for Both Distance and Near

The angle of deviation after surgery without correction for both distance and near

Time frame: Six months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augmented RecessionAngle of Deviation Without Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation without spectacles for distance2 DioptersStandard Deviation 9
Augmented RecessionAngle of Deviation Without Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation without spectacles for near14 DioptersStandard Deviation 18
FadenAngle of Deviation Without Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation without spectacles for distance-1 DioptersStandard Deviation 7
FadenAngle of Deviation Without Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation without spectacles for near6 DioptersStandard Deviation 9
p-value: 0.02t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Angle of Deviation With Spectacles for Both Distance and Near

The angle of deviation after surgery with full hypermetropic correction

Time frame: Six months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augmented RecessionAngle of Deviation With Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation with spectacles for distance-1 DioptersStandard Deviation 9
Augmented RecessionAngle of Deviation With Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation with spectacles for near2 DioptersStandard Deviation 9
FadenAngle of Deviation With Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation with spectacles for distance-3 DioptersStandard Deviation 7
FadenAngle of Deviation With Spectacles for Both Distance and NearAngle of deviation with spectacles for near-1 DioptersStandard Deviation 7
p-value: 0.22t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Developed Intraoperative and/or Postoperative Complications

Number of patients who developed intraoperative and postoperative complications as scleral perforation, fat prolapse, slipped and lost muscles

Time frame: Six months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Augmented RecessionNumber of Patients Who Developed Intraoperative and/or Postoperative Complications0 Participants
FadenNumber of Patients Who Developed Intraoperative and/or Postoperative Complications0 Participants
Secondary

Surgery Time

Time to complete the surgery

Time frame: Intraoperative time

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Augmented RecessionSurgery Time28 MinutesStandard Deviation 4
FadenSurgery Time51 MinutesStandard Deviation 7
p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026