Skip to content

NAVIGATE: Clinical Evaluation of superDimension™ Navigation System for Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy™

NAVIGATE: Clinical Evaluation of superDimension™ Navigation System for Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy™

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02410837
Enrollment
1388
Registered
2015-04-08
Start date
2015-04-16
Completion date
2019-11-01
Last updated
2021-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Lesion(s) Requiring Evaluation

Keywords

lung lesion, biopsy, bronchoscopy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes following electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy™ (ENB™) procedures using the superDimension™ navigation system.

Detailed description

This clinical trial information was submitted voluntarily under the applicable law and, therefore, certain submission deadlines may not apply. (That is, clinical trial information for this applicable clinical trial was submitted under section 402(j)(4)(A) of the Public Health Service Act and 42 CFR 11.60 and is not subject to the deadlines established by sections 402(j)(2) and (3) of the Public Health Service Act or 42 CFR 11.24 and 11.44.)

Interventions

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject presents with lung lesion(s) requiring evaluation * Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study * Subject is candidate for elective ENB™ procedure * Subject is over the age of 18

Exclusion criteria

* The subject is unable or unwilling to comply with study follow-up schedule * The subject has participated in an investigational drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment that would interfere with this study * Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing as determined by standard site practices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Pneumothorax (Grade 2+)index procedure visitThe primary endpoint is the incidence of pneumothorax related to the ENB™ index procedure rated as Grade 2 or higher according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale. Pneumothorax is a disorder characterized by abnormal presence of air in the pleural cavity resulting in the collapse of the lung. Severity increases as grade increases. Grade 1: Asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Symptomatic; intervention indicated (e.g., tube placement without sclerosis); Grade 3: Sclerosis and/or operative intervention indicated; hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Bronchopulmonary Hemorrhageindex procedure visitThe incidence of bronchopulmonary hemorrhage (rated as Grade 2 or higher according to th CTCAE scale) related to all ENB™ index procedures will be evaluated. Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage is a disorder characterized by bleeding from the bronchial wall and/or lung parenchyma. Severity increases as grade increases. Grade 1: Mild symptoms; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms; medical intervention indicated; Grade 3: Transfusion, radiologic, endoscopic, or operative intervention indicated (e.g., hemostasis of bleeding site); Grade 4: Life-threatening respiratory or hemodynamic compromise; intubation or urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death
Incidence of Respiratory Failureindex procedure visitThe incidence of respiratory failure (rated as Grade 4 or higher according to the CTCAE scale) related to all ENB™ index procedures will be evaluated. A respiratory failure is a disorder characterized by impaired gas exchange by the respiratory system resulting in hypoxemia and a decrease in oxygenation of the tissues that may be associated with an increase in arterial levels of carbon dioxide. Severity increases as grade increases. Within CTCAE, there are no grades 1, 2, or 3 for Respiratory Failure. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention, intubation, or ventilatory support indicated; Grade 5: Death
Quality of Life (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health State)Baseline, 1 month, 12 month, and 24 month follow up visitsSubject health status evaluated by EuroQol-5d (EQ-5D) questionnaire at all visits. (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health state) Questionnaire from EuroQol Group. Outcome reported on overall health state over time. 0 = worst imaginable health state, 100 = best imaginable health state.
Subject Satisfactionat the 1 month follow up visitSubject satisfaction evaluation at the 1 month visit. The question was overall, how satisfied were you with the ENB procedure. Options were: 1. Totally Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied 3. Neutral 4. Satisfied 5. Extremely Satisfied
Subject Productivity and Activityat the 1 month follow up visitElectromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB) procedure effect on subject productivity and activity using the ENB Productivity and Activity Questionnaire (ENB-PAQ) will be evaluated. The outcome measurement is the effect of ENB on their regular daily activities on a scale of 0-10 (0=no effect, 10=completely prevented).
Diagnostic Yieldup to 24 monthsDiagnostic yield will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other lung diseases in a lung lesion. Diagnostic yield was calculated per subject as the rate of true positives (TP) (for malignancy) plus true negatives (TN) (for malignancy) out of all subjects with attempted lung lesion biopsies (the denominator included subjects with no tissue obtained due to unsuccessful navigation).
Sensitivityup to 24 monthsSensitivity will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other lung diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Positives =TP, False Negatives = FN\]. (TP / \[TP+FN\])
Specificityup to 24 monthsSpecificity will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Negatives = TN, False Positives = FN\] (TN / \[FP+TN\])
Incidence of Pneumothorax (All)index procedure visitThe incidence of pneumothorax related to all ENB™ index procedures will be evaluated.
Negative Predictive Valueup to 24 monthsNegative Predictive Value (NPV) will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Negatives = TN, False Negatives = FN\] (TN / \[FN+TN\])
Repeat Biopsy Rateup to 24 monthsRepeat biopsy rate due to lack of diagnosis during the ENB™ index procedure will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion.
Tissue Adequacy for Molecular Genetic Testingat index procedure visitTissue adequacy for molecular genetic testing (if applicable).
Diagnosisup to 24 monthsDiagnosis will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion (per subject)
Stage at Diagnosisup to 24 monthsStage at diagnosis (if applicable) will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. (Diagnosis worsens as stage number increases). Refer to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition on Lung Cancer Staging. A brief description is provided here. Stage I = small lesions, no lymph node involvement Stage II = larger lesions and/or lymph nodes on sides of lung involved Stage III = larger lesions and/or lymph nodes in middle of chest involved Stage IV = metastases to other organs
Success Rate of Accurate Placement of Fiducial Markersat index procedure visitThe success rate of accurate placement of fiducial markers demonstrated through follow up imaging will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures conducted for placement of fiducial markers.
Success Rate of Dye Markingat index procedure visitThe success rate of dye marking demonstrated by successful surgical resection will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures conducted for dye marking in preparation for surgical resection.
Success Rate of Obtaining Lymph Node Biopsyat index procedure visitThe success rate of obtaining a lymph node biopsy to provide the stage of diagnosis will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures conducted for a lymph node biopsy.
Positive Predictive Valueup to 24 monthsPositive predictive value (PPV) will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Positives = TP, False Positives = FP\] (TP / \[TP+FP\])

Countries

Austria, Denmark, France, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)
Observational NAVIGATE arm (single arm study, no comparator)
1,388
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)
Observational NAVIGATE arm (single arm study, no comparator)
1,529
Total2,917

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath387
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up50
Overall StudyMoved to nursing home, cannot communicat1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision6
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
894 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
494 Participants
Age, Continuous67.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Average number of lesions biopsied per subject1.2 Number of lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Bronchus sign present on Computed Tomography (CT)777 participants
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease601 Participants
Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) used during ENB77 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1268 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
25 Participants
Family history of cancer816 Participants
Fluoroscopy used during ENB1299 number of lesions
General anesthesia1086 Participants
Lesion distance to pleura (mm)9.0 millimeters
Lesion size (mm)20.0 millimeters
Peripheral third of the lung1036 number of lesions
Personal history of cancer667 Participants
Pre-test probability of malignancy >65% (Physician Estimate)730 number of lesions
Pure to mostly ground glass opacity (GGO) lesions (Suzuki Class 1 or 2)95 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
164 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unable to report
37 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
1162 Participants
Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound (R-EBUS) used during Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB)703 Participants
Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) used777 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
24 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
36 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
50 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
42 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1213 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
698 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
690 Participants
Spiculated lesion border923 participants
Tobacco history (current or former)1107 Participants
Upper lobe lesion location897 number of lesions

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
403 / 1,388
other
Total, other adverse events
96 / 1,388
serious
Total, serious adverse events
497 / 1,388

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Pneumothorax (Grade 2+)

The primary endpoint is the incidence of pneumothorax related to the ENB™ index procedure rated as Grade 2 or higher according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale. Pneumothorax is a disorder characterized by abnormal presence of air in the pleural cavity resulting in the collapse of the lung. Severity increases as grade increases. Grade 1: Asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Symptomatic; intervention indicated (e.g., tube placement without sclerosis); Grade 3: Sclerosis and/or operative intervention indicated; hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death

Time frame: index procedure visit

Population: All subjects included in this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Incidence of Pneumothorax (Grade 2+)44 Participants
Secondary

Diagnosis

Diagnosis will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion (per subject)

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Number of subjects where navigation was complete and tissue was obtained for a diagnosis. Subjects with multiple lesion diagnoses may be represented more than once in all subcategories.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisInconclusive201 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisAdenocarcinoma279 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisSquamous Carcinoma133 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisOther Non-small cell lung cancer16 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisSmall cell carcinoma26 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisNeuroendocrine Carcinoma17 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisMetastatic Carcinoma49 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisLymphoma2 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisMalignant Cells (unable to characterize)12 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisMalignant Atypical Cells3 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisOther Malignancy3 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisBenign Inflammation198 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisBenign Other97 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisNormal Lung Tissue119 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisHamartoma1 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisGranuloma20 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisBacterial Infection24 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisFungal Infection14 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisViral Infection3 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisOrganizing Pneumonia7 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisInterstitial Lung Disease7 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisBenign Atypical Cells20 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisOther Benign15 Diagnoses
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)DiagnosisLymphocytes10 Diagnoses
Secondary

Diagnostic Yield

Diagnostic yield will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other lung diseases in a lung lesion. Diagnostic yield was calculated per subject as the rate of true positives (TP) (for malignancy) plus true negatives (TN) (for malignancy) out of all subjects with attempted lung lesion biopsies (the denominator included subjects with no tissue obtained due to unsuccessful navigation).

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Per subject including all those with attempted lung lesion biopsies. This includes any with unsuccessful navigation, but excludes subjects with insufficient follow-up where True Positive, True Negative, False Positive and False Negative could not be determined by 24 months.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Diagnostic Yield822 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Bronchopulmonary Hemorrhage

The incidence of bronchopulmonary hemorrhage (rated as Grade 2 or higher according to th CTCAE scale) related to all ENB™ index procedures will be evaluated. Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage is a disorder characterized by bleeding from the bronchial wall and/or lung parenchyma. Severity increases as grade increases. Grade 1: Mild symptoms; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms; medical intervention indicated; Grade 3: Transfusion, radiologic, endoscopic, or operative intervention indicated (e.g., hemostasis of bleeding site); Grade 4: Life-threatening respiratory or hemodynamic compromise; intubation or urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death

Time frame: index procedure visit

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Incidence of Bronchopulmonary Hemorrhage23 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Pneumothorax (All)

The incidence of pneumothorax related to all ENB™ index procedures will be evaluated.

Time frame: index procedure visit

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Incidence of Pneumothorax (All)65 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Respiratory Failure

The incidence of respiratory failure (rated as Grade 4 or higher according to the CTCAE scale) related to all ENB™ index procedures will be evaluated. A respiratory failure is a disorder characterized by impaired gas exchange by the respiratory system resulting in hypoxemia and a decrease in oxygenation of the tissues that may be associated with an increase in arterial levels of carbon dioxide. Severity increases as grade increases. Within CTCAE, there are no grades 1, 2, or 3 for Respiratory Failure. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention, intubation, or ventilatory support indicated; Grade 5: Death

Time frame: index procedure visit

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Incidence of Respiratory Failure8 Participants
Secondary

Negative Predictive Value

Negative Predictive Value (NPV) will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Negatives = TN, False Negatives = FN\] (TN / \[FN+TN\])

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Number of subjects with a False Negative (FN) for Malignancy or True Negative (TN) for Malignancy diagnosis by 24-months.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Negative Predictive Value285 Participants
Secondary

Positive Predictive Value

Positive predictive value (PPV) will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Positives = TP, False Positives = FP\] (TP / \[TP+FP\])

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Number of subjects with a True Positive (TP) for Malignancy or False Positive (FP) for Malignancy diagnosis by 24-months.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Positive Predictive Value537 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Life (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health State)

Subject health status evaluated by EuroQol-5d (EQ-5D) questionnaire at all visits. (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health state) Questionnaire from EuroQol Group. Outcome reported on overall health state over time. 0 = worst imaginable health state, 100 = best imaginable health state.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 12 month, and 24 month follow up visits

Population: Number of subjects who completed the EQ-5D at the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Quality of Life (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health State)Baseline70.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Quality of Life (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health State)1-Month69.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Quality of Life (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health State)12-Month70.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Quality of Life (Mobility, Self-care, Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health State)24-Month72.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
Secondary

Repeat Biopsy Rate

Repeat biopsy rate due to lack of diagnosis during the ENB™ index procedure will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion.

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Number of subjects with navigation complete and tissue obtained

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Repeat Biopsy Rate334 Participants
Secondary

Sensitivity

Sensitivity will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other lung diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Positives =TP, False Negatives = FN\]. (TP / \[TP+FN\])

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Number of subjects with a True Positive (TP) for Malignancy or False Negative (FN) for Malignancy diagnosis by 24-months.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Sensitivity537 Participants
Secondary

Specificity

Specificity will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. \[True Negatives = TN, False Positives = FN\] (TN / \[FP+TN\])

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Number of subjects with a False Positive (FP) for Malignancy or True Negative (TN) for Malignancy diagnosis by 24-months.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Specificity285 Participants
Secondary

Stage at Diagnosis

Stage at diagnosis (if applicable) will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures performed for suspicion of cancer or other diseases in a lung lesion. (Diagnosis worsens as stage number increases). Refer to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition on Lung Cancer Staging. A brief description is provided here. Stage I = small lesions, no lymph node involvement Stage II = larger lesions and/or lymph nodes on sides of lung involved Stage III = larger lesions and/or lymph nodes in middle of chest involved Stage IV = metastases to other organs

Time frame: up to 24 months

Population: Number of subjects diagnosed with primary lung cancer.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Stage at DiagnosisStage I251 Participants
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Stage at DiagnosisStage II52 Participants
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Stage at DiagnosisStage III81 Participants
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Stage at DiagnosisStage IV84 Participants
Secondary

Subject Productivity and Activity

Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB) procedure effect on subject productivity and activity using the ENB Productivity and Activity Questionnaire (ENB-PAQ) will be evaluated. The outcome measurement is the effect of ENB on their regular daily activities on a scale of 0-10 (0=no effect, 10=completely prevented).

Time frame: at the 1 month follow up visit

Population: Number of subjects who completed the ENB-PAQ at 1-month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Subject Productivity and Activity0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction

Subject satisfaction evaluation at the 1 month visit. The question was overall, how satisfied were you with the ENB procedure. Options were: 1. Totally Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied 3. Neutral 4. Satisfied 5. Extremely Satisfied

Time frame: at the 1 month follow up visit

Population: Subjects who completed the 1-month subject satisfaction questionnaire (How satisfied are you with ENB on a scale of 1-5)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Subject Satisfaction4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Success Rate of Accurate Placement of Fiducial Markers

The success rate of accurate placement of fiducial markers demonstrated through follow up imaging will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures conducted for placement of fiducial markers.

Time frame: at index procedure visit

Population: Number of subjects where ENB was used to aid in placement of fiducial markers, and follow-up imaging data was available.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Success Rate of Accurate Placement of Fiducial Markers253 Participants
Secondary

Success Rate of Dye Marking

The success rate of dye marking demonstrated by successful surgical resection will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures conducted for dye marking in preparation for surgical resection.

Time frame: at index procedure visit

Population: Number of subjects where ENB was used to aid in pleural dye marking.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Success Rate of Dye Marking21 Participants
Secondary

Success Rate of Obtaining Lymph Node Biopsy

The success rate of obtaining a lymph node biopsy to provide the stage of diagnosis will be evaluated for all ENB™ index procedures conducted for a lymph node biopsy.

Time frame: at index procedure visit

Population: Number of subjects where ENB was used to aid in lymph node biopsy.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Success Rate of Obtaining Lymph Node Biopsy31 Participants
Secondary

Tissue Adequacy for Molecular Genetic Testing

Tissue adequacy for molecular genetic testing (if applicable).

Time frame: at index procedure visit

Population: This is the number of lesions diagnosed with primary lung adenocarcinoma or non-small-cell lung cancer not otherwise specified, where molecular genetic testing was attempted. This does not include all lesions biopsied as not all lesions had one of these specific diagnoses, nor did all these with these specific diagnoses have molecular testing attempted.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
NAVIGATE (Single Arm Study)Tissue Adequacy for Molecular Genetic Testing89 Lesions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026