Skip to content

Plaque Psoriasis Efficacy and Safety With Secukinumab

Long Term Clear Skin Maintenance Treatment Optimization in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label With Blinded-assessment, Comparative, 52 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Secukinumab 300 mg s.c.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02409667
Acronym
OPTIMISE
Enrollment
16487
Registered
2015-04-07
Start date
2015-05-07
Completion date
2017-05-08
Last updated
2019-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plaque Psoriasis

Keywords

plaque, psoriasis

Brief summary

To demonstrate in the patient pool of PASI 90 responders at Week 24 that secukinumab 300 mg s.c. when administered at a longer dosing interval is non-inferior to secukinumab 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks treatment with respect to maintaining a PASI 90 response rate at Week 52.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSecukinumab

Secukinumab for s.c. injection was supplied in single boxes each containing 2 pre-filled syringes (PFS) of 150 mg secukinumab in a 1 mL liquid formulation. Each 300 mg dose was administered as 2 PFS injections of 150 mg secukinumab.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: 1. Chronic plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 6 months prior to Screening and candidate for systemic therapy. 2. Moderate to severe psoriasis at Baseline as evidenced by: * PASI ≥ 10 and * IGA mod 2011 score of 3 or higher (based on a scale of 0 to 4) and * BSA affected by plaque-type psoriasis of ≥ 10%. Main

Exclusion criteria

1. History of exposure to any biologic drug taken for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis or any other indication including but not limited to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, anti interleukin (IL)12/23, or any anti-IL 17A or IL 17A receptor (IL 17AR) antibody. 2. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical classes. 3. Forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type (eg, pustular, erythrodermic and guttate psoriasis). 4. Drug-induced psoriasis (ie, new onset or current exacerbation from beta-blockers, calcium channel inhibitors or lithium). 5. Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments (eg, topical or systemic corticosteroids, ultraviolet (UV) therapy). 6. Ongoing use of other non-psoriasis prohibited treatments. Washout periods detailed in the protocol have to be adhered to. All other prior non-psoriasis concomitant treatments must be at a stable dose as detailed in the protocol before initiation of study drug. 7. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test (\> 5 mIU/mL). 8. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using effective methods of contraception during dosing of study drug and for 16 weeks after stopping study drug. 9. Active ongoing inflammatory diseases other than psoriasis that might confound the evaluation of the benefit of secukinumab therapy. 10. Underlying condition (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal conditions) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, significantly immunocompromises the patient and/or places the patient at unacceptable risk for receiving an immunomodulatory therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maintenance of PASI 90 Response at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 52PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24week 52PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 52PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Baseline, Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Baseline, Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Baseline, Week 52The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. A negative mean percentage change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Baseline, Week 52The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. A negative mean percentage change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Baseline, Week 52The WPAI-PSO is a self-administered questionnaire comprised of 6 questions about effects of psoriasis on the patient's ability to work and perform regular activities based on the previous 7 days. The questionnaire quantifies the number of hours the respondent was unable to work and evaluates how much the respondent's psoriasis affected productivity while working. For respondents who were not in paid employment, the questionnaire evaluated how much the respondent's psoriasis affects their ability to perform regular daily activities. Four outcomes were generated from the WPAI-PSO: % Absenteeism: percent work time missed due to health; % Presenteism: percent impairment while working due to health; % Total work productivity impairment: percent overall work impairment due to health; % Total activity impairment: percent activity impairment due to health for all respondents. First 3 outcomes applied to employed participants only. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Key Secondary: PASI 90 Response Rate at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 52PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).
Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Baseline, Week 52Self-administered, 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching and scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; and Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, and scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) and the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement
Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Baseline, Week 52Self-administered, 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching and scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; and Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, and scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) and the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Baseline, Week 52A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D VAS in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Baseline, Week 52A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state).
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, United Kingdom (UK)) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Baseline, Week 52The EQ-5D quantifies the health state of a patient for the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression. In this study the EQ-5D-5L version has been used which evaluates each of these dimensions using the following 5 labels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems & unable to/extreme problems. Based on the 5 dimensions, a summary score (utility index) was derived using country specific value sets evaluating the patient condition described by the outcome in the single dimensions. The EQ-5D-5L (in this trail) utility index based on the crosswalk value sets available from the EuroQol for Germany & UK (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/) was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. A visual analogue scale was used within the EQ-5D measuring the health state of the patients, ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, UK) in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Baseline, Week 52The EQ-5D quantifies the health state of a patient for the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. In the current study the EQ-5D-5L version has been used which evaluates each of these dimensions using the following five labels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and unable to/extreme problems. Based on the five dimensions, a summary score (utility index) was derived using country specific value sets evaluating the patient condition described by the outcome in the single dimensions. For this trial, the EQ-5D-5L utility index based on the crosswalk value sets available from the EuroQol for Germany and for UK (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/) was calculated. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D measuring the health state of the patients, ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state).
Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Baseline, Week 52The WPAI-PSO is a self-administered questionnaire comprised of 6 questions about effects of psoriasis on the patient's ability to work and perform regular activities based on the previous 7 days. The questionnaire quantifies the number of hours the respondent was unable to work and evaluates how much the respondent's psoriasis affected productivity while working. For respondents who were not in paid employment, the questionnaire evaluated how much the respondent's psoriasis affects their ability to perform regular daily activities. Four outcomes were generated from the WPAI-PSO: % Absenteeism: percent work time missed due to health; % Presenteism: percent impairment while working due to health; % Total work productivity impairment: percent overall work impairment due to health; % Total activity impairment: percent activity impairment due to health for all respondents. First 3 outcomes applied to employed participants only. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The screening period was up to 4 weeks and rescreening was allowed for an unlimited number of times. At the Screening Visit, every patient was registered in an Interactive Response Technology and the Investigator ensured that the patient fulfilled all the inclusion/exclusion criteria

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Period 1: All Participants
Participants received secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.
1,647
Total1,647

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Adverse Event250000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Lack of Efficacy480000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Lost to Follow-up60000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Non-compliance with study treatment50000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Physician Decision40000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Pregnancy10000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Protocol deviation200000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Withdrawal by Subject60000
Treatment Period 1, Baseline to Week 24Withdrawal of informed consent60000
Treatment Period 2, Week 24 to Week 52)Adverse Event07412
Treatment Period 2, Week 24 to Week 52)Lack of Efficacy00020
Treatment Period 2, Week 24 to Week 52)Lost to Follow-up07430
Treatment Period 2, Week 24 to Week 52)Pregnancy00101
Treatment Period 2, Week 24 to Week 52)Protocol deviation00300
Treatment Period 2, Week 24 to Week 52)Withdrawal by Subject04520
Treatment Period 2, Week 24 to Week 52)Withdrawal of informed consent05400

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Period 1: All Participants
Age, Continuous43.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1597 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
476 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1171 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1,6470 / 6440 / 6620 / 1140 / 93
other
Total, other adverse events
884 / 1,647272 / 644288 / 66264 / 11460 / 93
serious
Total, serious adverse events
73 / 1,64725 / 64425 / 6624 / 1143 / 93

Outcome results

Primary

Maintenance of PASI 90 Response at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set for Treatment Period 2 of PASI 90 responders (FAS-P90R): The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Maintenance of PASI 90 Response at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24552 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Maintenance of PASI 90 Response at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24496 Participants
p-value: 0.149995% CI: [1.44, 2.55]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. A negative mean percentage change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P90R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24-12.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.325
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24-11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.93, -0.31]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Not relevant is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. A negative mean percentage change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Participants from the FAS-P75R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. FAS-P75R: All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at Week 24, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24-10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.605
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in DLQI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24-9.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.88
p-value: 0.067595% CI: [-0.09, 2.42]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

Self-administered, 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching and scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; and Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, and scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) and the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P90R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Pain-4.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.771
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Itching-5.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.885
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Scaling-6.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.659
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Pain-4.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2727
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Itching-5.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.985
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Scaling-5.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.757
Comparison: Painp-value: 0.121995% CI: [-0.3, 0.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: Itchingp-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.57, -0.18]ANCOVA
Comparison: Scalingp-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.48, -0.14]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

Self-administered, 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10) were used to evaluate the patients' assessment of their current pain, itching and scaling. Respondents answered the following questions for the assessment: Pain: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related pain over the past 24 hours?; Itching: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related itch over the past 24 hours?; and Scaling: Overall, how severe was your psoriasis-related scaling over the past 24 hours? Patients had to rate their pain, itching, and scaling from 0 to 10 (11-point scale), with the understanding that the 0 represents the absence or null end of the pain, itching, or scale intensity (i.e. no pain, itching or scaling) and the 10 represents the other extreme of pain, itching, or scaling intensity (i.e. pain, itching or scaling as bad as it could be). The number that the patient selected represents his or her intensity score in the respective category. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Participants from the FAS-P75R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. FAS-P75R: All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at Week 24, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Pain-3.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.754
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Itching-4.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.883
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Scaling-4.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Pain-3.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.049
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Itching-4.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.129
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Pain, Itching and Scaling Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Scaling-5.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.899
Comparison: Scalingp-value: 0.020395% CI: [0.12, 1.39]ANCOVA
Comparison: Painp-value: 0.645795% CI: [-0.57, 0.92]ANCOVA
Comparison: Itchingp-value: 0.613695% CI: [-0.56, 0.94]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P90R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the post-baseline time point, were analyzed. The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 36-20.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.439
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 44-20.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.384
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 32-20.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.581
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 48-20.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.472
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 40-20.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.392
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 52-20.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.301
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 28-20.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.471
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 52-19.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.513
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 28-19.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.511
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 32-19.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.474
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 36-19.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.563
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 40-19.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.393
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 44-19.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.484
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Week 48-19.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.509
Comparison: Week 28p-value: 0.048995% CI: [-0.18, 0]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 32p-value: 0.107395% CI: [-0.19, 0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.37, -0.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 40p-value: 0.000595% CI: [-0.38, -0.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 44p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.45, -0.15]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 095% CI: [-0.7, -0.27]ANCOVA
p-value: 095% CI: [-0.81, -0.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

Population: Participants from the FAS-P75R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the post-baseline time point, were analyzed. FAS-P75R: All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at Week 24, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 36-16.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.356
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 44-16.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.553
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 32-15.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.002
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 48-15.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.246
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 40-16.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.908
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 52-15.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.371
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 28-16.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 52-16.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.011
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 28-16.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.029
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 32-16.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.941
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 36-16.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.996
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 40-16.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.17
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 44-16.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.259
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in PASI in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Week 48-16.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.307
Comparison: Week 28p-value: 0.17495% CI: [-0.18, 0.99]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 32p-value: 0.028795% CI: [0.08, 1.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.120295% CI: [-0.16, 1.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 40p-value: 0.115795% CI: [-0.19, 1.68]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 44p-value: 0.318995% CI: [-0.52, 1.59]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.02495% CI: [0.16, 2.18]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 52p-value: 0.00995% CI: [0.37, 2.57]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, UK) in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

The EQ-5D quantifies the health state of a patient for the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. In the current study the EQ-5D-5L version has been used which evaluates each of these dimensions using the following five labels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and unable to/extreme problems. Based on the five dimensions, a summary score (utility index) was derived using country specific value sets evaluating the patient condition described by the outcome in the single dimensions. For this trial, the EQ-5D-5L utility index based on the crosswalk value sets available from the EuroQol for Germany and for UK (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/) was calculated. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D measuring the health state of the patients, ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Participants from the FAS-P75R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. FAS-P75R: All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at Week 24, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, UK) in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Germany0.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.164
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, UK) in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24UK0.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.206
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, UK) in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Germany0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.164
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, UK) in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24UK0.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.204
Comparison: Germanyp-value: 0.185295% CI: [-0.05, 0.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: UKp-value: 0.220395% CI: [-0.07, 0.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, United Kingdom (UK)) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

The EQ-5D quantifies the health state of a patient for the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort & anxiety/depression. In this study the EQ-5D-5L version has been used which evaluates each of these dimensions using the following 5 labels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems & unable to/extreme problems. Based on the 5 dimensions, a summary score (utility index) was derived using country specific value sets evaluating the patient condition described by the outcome in the single dimensions. The EQ-5D-5L (in this trail) utility index based on the crosswalk value sets available from the EuroQol for Germany & UK (https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/) was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. A visual analogue scale was used within the EQ-5D measuring the health state of the patients, ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P90R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, United Kingdom (UK)) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Germany0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, United Kingdom (UK)) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24UK0.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, United Kingdom (UK)) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Germany0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.182
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D Utility Index (Germany, United Kingdom (UK)) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24UK0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
Comparison: UKp-value: 0.011795% CI: [0, 0.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: Germanyp-value: 0.086195% CI: [0, 0.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D VAS in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Participants from the FAS-P75R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. FAS-P75R: All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at Week 24, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D VAS in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 2415.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.099
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D VAS in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 2418.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.855
p-value: 0.282395% CI: [-6.55, 1.92]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used within the EQ-5D. This scale recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20-cm VAS where the endpoints were labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state. This resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (=worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (=best imaginable health state). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P90R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 2424.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.296
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 2421.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.074
p-value: 0.002795% CI: [0.77, 3.68]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

The WPAI-PSO is a self-administered questionnaire comprised of 6 questions about effects of psoriasis on the patient's ability to work and perform regular activities based on the previous 7 days. The questionnaire quantifies the number of hours the respondent was unable to work and evaluates how much the respondent's psoriasis affected productivity while working. For respondents who were not in paid employment, the questionnaire evaluated how much the respondent's psoriasis affects their ability to perform regular daily activities. Four outcomes were generated from the WPAI-PSO: % Absenteeism: percent work time missed due to health; % Presenteism: percent impairment while working due to health; % Total work productivity impairment: percent overall work impairment due to health; % Total activity impairment: percent activity impairment due to health for all respondents. First 3 outcomes applied to employed participants only. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P90R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Absenteeism-4.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.59
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Presenteeism-23.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.968
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Total activity impairment-24.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.85
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Work productivity loss-31.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.392
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Work productivity loss-28.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.996
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Absenteeism-1.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.759
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Total activity impairment-23.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.861
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Score in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24Presenteeism-23.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.522
Comparison: Absenteeismp-value: 0.210195% CI: [-2.48, 0.55]ANCOVA
Comparison: Presenteeismp-value: 0.297195% CI: [-1.93, 0.59]ANCOVA
Comparison: Total activity impairmentp-value: 0.549995% CI: [-2.59, 1.38]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.075895% CI: [-2.28, 0.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

The WPAI-PSO is a self-administered questionnaire comprised of 6 questions about effects of psoriasis on the patient's ability to work and perform regular activities based on the previous 7 days. The questionnaire quantifies the number of hours the respondent was unable to work and evaluates how much the respondent's psoriasis affected productivity while working. For respondents who were not in paid employment, the questionnaire evaluated how much the respondent's psoriasis affects their ability to perform regular daily activities. Four outcomes were generated from the WPAI-PSO: % Absenteeism: percent work time missed due to health; % Presenteism: percent impairment while working due to health; % Total work productivity impairment: percent overall work impairment due to health; % Total activity impairment: percent activity impairment due to health for all respondents. First 3 outcomes applied to employed participants only. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Participants from the FAS-P75R, who had evaluable data at both baseline and week 52, were analyzed. FAS-P75R: All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at Week 24, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Absenteeism-2.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.99
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Presenteeism-22.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.377
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Total activity impairment-23.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.657
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Work productivity loss-18.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.824
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Work productivity loss-22.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.192
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Absenteeism-3.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.698
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Total activity impairment-21.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.905
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Change From Baseline in WPAI-PSO Score in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24Presenteeism-22.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.333
Comparison: Absenteeismp-value: 0.415695% CI: [-1.71, 4.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Presenteeismp-value: 0.861995% CI: [-6.59, 7.85]ANCOVA
Comparison: Total activity impairmentp-value: 0.613995% CI: [-6.31, 10.61]ANCOVA
Comparison: Work productivity lossp-value: 0.567495% CI: [-4.16, 7.56]ANCOVA
Secondary

Key Secondary: PASI 90 Response Rate at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: FAS for Treatment Period 2 of PASI 75 responders who did not achieve a PASI 90 response (FAS-P75R): All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at the Week 24 visit, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Period 2: Group 1Key Secondary: PASI 90 Response Rate at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 2453 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2Key Secondary: PASI 90 Response Rate at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 2452 Participants
p-value: 0.101395% CI: [0.35, 1.1]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

Time frame: week 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P90R with evaluable data were analyzed. The FAS-P90R included all participants who were rated as PASI 90 responders at the Week 24 visit, randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 and received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 75597 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 100378 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 90553 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24IGA mod 2011564 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 50608 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24IGA mod 2011529 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 50624 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 75588 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 90496 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Week 24PASI 100305 Participants
Secondary

PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Only participants from the FAS-P75R with evaluable data were analyzed. FAS-P75R: All participants who were rated as PASI 75 responders but did not achieve a PASI 90 response at the Week 24 visit, were randomized to treatment groups 3 or 4 and who received at least one dose of study drug at or after visit Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 7574 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 10012 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 9053 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24IGA mod 2011 0 or 164 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 1PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 5098 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24IGA mod 2011 0 or 172 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 5088 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 7580 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 9052 Participants
Treatment Period 2: Group 2PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Responders at Week 52 in Participants With a PASI Response of ≥75 to <90 at Week 24PASI 10013 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026