Skip to content

Intensive Versus Minimal Surveillance of Patients With Resected Dukes B2-C Colorectal Carcinoma

A Randomized Trial Of Intensive Versus Minimal Surveillance Of Patients With Resected Dukes B2-C Colorectal Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02409472
Acronym
GILDA
Enrollment
1242
Registered
2015-04-06
Start date
1998-04-30
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2015-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Surveillance

Keywords

randomized clinical trial

Brief summary

Dukes B2-C colorectal cancer patients who had no evidence of disease at the end of their front line treatment (surgery and adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, if indicated) are eligible for the trial and randomized to two different surveillance programs. These programs differ greatly in the frequency of diagnostic imaging. They have similar schedules of physical examinations and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessments. Patients will receive baseline and yearly health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Primary outcomes are overall survival and QoL.

Detailed description

Minimal program for colon cancer: Office visit and CEA at 4,8,12,16,20,24,30,36,42,48, and 60 months. Colonoscopy at 12, and 48 months. Liver echography\* at 8, and 20 months. Intensive program for colon cancer: Office visit, CBC, CEA+CA 19.9 at 4,8,12,16,20,24,30,36,42,48, and 60 months. Colonoscopy at 12, 24, 36, 48,and 60 months. Liver echography\* at 4,8,12,16,24,36,48, and 60 months. Chest X-ray at 12,24,36,48,and 60 months. \* Abdominal-pelvis C.T., as an alternative to echography, was a 2° level exam only (doubtful results of physical examination or echography; increasing levels of CEA; predictable poor sensitivity of echography due to obesity or other anatomic-clinical conditions)

Interventions

OTHERsurveillance program after completion of primary treatment

These are two different surveillance programs for Dukes B2-C colorectal cancer patients who have no evidence of disease at the end of their front line treatment (surgery and adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, if indicated). These programs differ greatly in the frequency of diagnostic imaging. They had similar schedules of physical examinations and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessments.

Sponsors

Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum with Dukes Astler-Coller modification stage B2-C who had been treated with curative intent (radical excision ± adjuvant radio-chemotherapy) . * Eligible patients had to be free of known cancer prior to study entry as attested by negative results of endoscopy, liver ultrasonography, chest roentgenography and serum CEA level performed \< 4 months before randomization

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to undergo testing (disability, allergy to contrast agents, etc.) and patients geographically not amenable to full follow-up. * Patients enrolled onto any other research protocol that requires strict adherence to any specific follow-up practice. * A history of any previous malignancy in the last 10 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer). * No informed consent to participate in the trial according to local regulatory guidelines.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)5-year OSOS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause
Health Related Quality of LifeYearly assessment over 5 yearsmean scores for Short Form Health Status Survey (SF)12 and Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) questionnaires

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease free survival (DFS)5-year DFSDFS is defined as the time from randomization to the earliest occurrence of progression or second primary colorectal cancer in both groups

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026