Skip to content

Effectiveness of Hygiene Solutions on Denture Biofilm

Clinical Evaluation of an Experimental Solution Based on Ricinus Communis Compared to Sodium Hypochlorite for Denture Cleansing

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02407834
Enrollment
64
Registered
2015-04-03
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stomatitis

Keywords

Biofilms, Dentures, Denture Cleansers, Castor Oil, Stomatitis

Brief summary

This clinical trial evaluated Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite solutions in different concentrations for denture cleanliness, regarding biofilm removal capacity, remission of atrophic chronic candidiasis, degree of patient satisfaction and antimicrobial action against specific microorganism. Sixty-four denture wearers with absence (n=40) or presence of Candidiasis (n=24) were selected and oriented to brush their dentures with a specific brush and neutral soap for 3 minutes, 3 times a day and immerse them, once a day, in hygiene solutions (0.25% sodium hypochlorite - S1 and 0.5% - S2, 10% R. communis - S3; Saline - S4: control) during 20 minutes, for 7 days. The solutions were used in a randomized, double blind and cross form with washout periods. To quantify biofilm with software ImageTool 3.0, the inner surface was disclosed (1% neutral red) and photographed at the end of each period. The Candidiasis remission was assessed by scores before and after the use of solutions. Patient satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. Antimicrobial activity was determined by Colony Forming Units (CFU) counts of Streptococcus mutans, Candida spp., and gram-negative microorganisms. For collecting biofilm, internal surface of each maxillary complete denture was brushed with saline solution, and the biofilm suspension obtained. After serial dilutions (100 - 10-3), 50 uL aliquots were seeded in Petri dishes containing Mitis salivarius agar base, CHROMagar Candida® and MacConkey agar for detecting S. mutans, Candida spp., or gram-negative microorganisms, respectively. After incubation, colonies were counted, and values in CFU/mL were calculated. Biofilm removal was analyzed as a split-plot with two variation factors: inflammation and solutions. The candidiasis remission was analyzed after adjustment using multinomial logistic regression. Logistic regression analysis and compound symmetry was adopted for patient satisfaction. The antimicrobial action was analyzed with Friedman´s test. Antimicrobial action data were processed after transformation - log10 (CFU + 1) - and were analyzed by Friedman test (α = 0.05).

Detailed description

Sixty-four denture wearers with (n=24) and without Candidiasis (n=40) were enrolled and instructed to brush and immerse their dentures in 4 different storage solutions (S1: 0.25% sodium hypochlorite; S2: 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; S3: 10% R. communis; and S4: Saline/Control). The interventions were randomly performed in a double blind and crossover format with washout periods. After 7 days of brushing and storage, the biofilm formed in the inner surfaces of dentures was disclosed and photographed to quantification. Candidiasis remission was assessed by scores and the patient satisfaction by a questionnaire. Antimicrobial activity of the solutions was determined by counting the Colony Forming Units (CFUs) of Streptococcus mutans, Candida spp., and gram-negative microorganisms. For collecting biofilm, each complete upper denture was placed in a Petri dish, its internal surface was brushed (Tek brush) with saline solution for 2 min, and the biofilm suspension was transferred to a test tube. After serial dilutions (100 - 10-3), 50 uL aliquots were seeded in Petri dishes containing Mitis salivarius agar base, CHROMagar Candida® and MacConkey agar for detecting S. mutans, Candida spp., or gram-negative microorganisms, respectively. After incubation, colonies were counted, and values in CFU/mL were calculated.

Interventions

OTHERS1

Immersion in 0.25% sodium hypochlorite for 20 minutes, during 7 days.

OTHERS2

Immersion in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 20 minutes, during 7 days.

OTHERS3

Immersion in 10% Ricinus communis for 20 minutes, during 7 days.

OTHERS4

Immersion in Saline solution for 20 minutes, during 7 days.

Sponsors

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Edentulous that make regular use of dentures in acrylic resin for at least one year with the presence of biofilm.

Exclusion criteria

* Problems in adapting, reline, or repair fractures * Patients with limited communication or collaboration as the following recommended protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
antimicrobial action against specific microorganisms by Colony Forming Units counts7 days
biofilm removal capacity using Image Tool software7 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
remission of atrophic chronic candidiasis using multinomial logistic regression analysis7 days
degree of patient satisfaction assessed by specific questionnaire7 days

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026