Endometrial Dysfunction
Conditions
Keywords
Endometrial Insufficiency, Endometrial Receptivity
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the differences that exist in RNA molecules, the biochemical process of methylation, and estrogen receptor binding in patients that have failed to produce adequate endometrium in synthetic embryo transfer cycles when compared to patients whose endometrium thickness is within normal limits.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine the differences that may exist in RNA molecules, the biochemical process of methylation, and estrogen receptor binding (this is a group of proteins in the cell that are activated by the hormone estrogen) in patients that have failed to produce adequate endometrium (uterine lining) in synthetic embryo transfer cycles when compared to patients whose endometrium thickness is within normal limits. Appropriate embryo development and luteal phase (when fertilization and implantation occur) transformation of the endometrium create a small window of opportunity where successful implantation can occur. The interaction between the embryo and the endometrium is complex and poorly understood. The endometrium, which consists of two layers called the functionalis and basalis, goes through changes during the menstrual cycle. The changes that occur are needed for successful implantation of an embryo. The proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle is primarily governed by estrogen and is responsible for the thickening of the endometrium. Progesterone primarily controls the last half of the menstrual cycle and causes changes which allows for embryo implantation. Through in vitro fertilization (IVF), the investigators have seen that the correct thickness of endometrium is a marker of successful implantation and ongoing pregnancy, although the reason for this is not entirely clear. In order to better understand the processes that may occur in the endometrium, the investigators are conducting a study which evaluates biochemical markers of those patients who have shown a failure to proliferate during previous synthetic IVF frozen cycles and biochemical markers of control patients who have no known endometrial pathology.
Interventions
OTHEREstradiol Valerate, Progesterone in Oil, Leuprolide
Patients will undergo a Leuprolide endometrial preparatory cycle using estradiol valerate, progesterone in oil and once completed will have a uterine aspiration and biopsy performed.
Sponsors
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
for Case Group: * Diagnosis of endometrial insufficiency- prior cycle with maximal endometrial thickness ≤ 6mm, abnormal endometrial pattern (failure to attain a trilaminar appearance), persistent endometrial fluid.
Exclusion criteria
for Case and Control Groups: * Any evidence for surgically induced endometrial insufficiency (Asherman's syndrome) * Presence of hydrosalpinges that communicate with endometrial cavity * Any contraindications to undergoing estrogen stimulation of the endometrium * Age ≥35 years and smoking ≥15 cigarettes per day * Multiple risk factors for arterial cardiovascular disease (smoking, diabetes, and hypertension) * Hypertension (systolic ≥140 mmHg or diastolic ≥90 mmHg) * Venous thromboembolism (current or history of) * Known thrombogenic mutations * Known ischemic heart disease * History of stroke * Complicated valvular heart disease (pulmonary hypertension, risk for atrial fibrillation, history of subacute bacterial endocarditis) * Systemic lupus erythematosus (positive or unknown antiphospholipid antibodies) * Migraine with aura at any age * Breast cancer * Cirrhosis * Hepatocellular adenoma or malignant hepatoma * History of undiagnosed abnormal uterine bleeding. * Allergic reaction to estradiol valerate, progesterone in oil, leuprolide acetate * Known pregnancy or delivery within the past 6 months * Breastfeeding * Obesity \>35 kg/m2
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To determine the differences that may exist in transcriptome, methylome, and estrogen receptor binding between case and control groups | One year |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed