Skip to content

The INDORSE Study: Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV: Outcomes on Renal Sodium Excretion

Effects of DPP-4 Inhibitor Therapy on Renal Sodium Handling and Renal Hemodynamics in Type 2 Diabetes Patients. The INDORSE Study: Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV: Outcomes on Renal Sodium Excretion

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02406443
Acronym
INDORSE
Enrollment
36
Registered
2015-04-02
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2018-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Type 2 Diabetes, DPP-4 inhibitors, renal sodium excretion

Brief summary

Background: Dedicated renal hemodynamic and renal function studies are lacking for DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with Type 2 diabetes; accordingly little is known regarding the mechanisms mediating the renal effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in humans. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of DPP-4 inhibition acutely (single dose) and following short-term therapy (28 days) on renal sodium handling and renal hemodynamics and function in patients with type 2 diabetes and systolic hypertension. Design: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, Phase IV. Patient population: 32 patients with Type 2 diabetes, HbA1c (6.5%-9%), with systolic blood pressure ranging from 120-160 mmHg. Intervention: subjects will be randomized (1:1) to either sitagliptin (100 mg daily) or to placebo (1 tablet daily) for 28 days. Endpoints: Fractional excretion of sodium, renal function, and renal hemodynamics.

Detailed description

Background: DPP-4 inhibition improves glycemic control, modestly reduces blood pressure and may also reduce albuminuria in patients with Type 2 diabetes; effects which occur without significantly modifying heart rate or body weight. While preclinical studies have demonstrated that DPP-4 inhibition acutely increases urinary sodium excretion in addition to other favorable renal effects (anti-inflammatory, anti-proteinuric), few studies have examined the renal effects of DPP-4 inhibition either acutely or following short-term therapy in humans with type 2 diabetes. Considering the world-wide prevalence of Type 2 diabetes and the increasing use of DPP-4 inhibitors amongst patients, it is important to ascertain potential non-glycemic effects of DPP-4 inhibitors including those within the kidney. Study Objectives: To determine effect(s) of DPP-4 inhibition on tubular sodium handling, renal hemodynamics, and renal function. Study Design: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, Phase IV. Study Patients: 32 patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Systolic Hypertension (SBP 120-160 mmHg). Endpoints: Fractional excretion of sodium, renal function (measured GFR), renal hemodynamics (effective renal plasma flow, filtration fraction, renal blood flow, renal vascular resistance), systemic hemodynamics (non-invasive cardiac monitoring), plasma neurohormones, urinary vasoactive mediators, markers of free radical stress.

Interventions

DRUGSitaglitpin

Oral DPP-4 inhibitor, 100 mg tablet administered once daily for 28 days

OTHERPlacebo

Oral tablet (no medicinal ingredients) administered once daily for 28 days

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals of 18-70 years of age, * with Type 2 Diabetes, * with an HbA1c (6.5%-9%), * and with a systolic blood pressure (120-160 mmHg).

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with: 1. Type 1 Diabetes, 2. eGFR \<50mL/min/1.73m, 3. pregnancy or breast feeding, 4. significant cardiac, pulmonary or liver disease, 5. prior history of pancreatitis, medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes, 6. SBP \>161 mmHg, 7) DBP \>100 mmHg, 7. alcohol or substance abuse, 8. states of secondary hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENA)3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 doseFENA at 3Hrs post-study drug administration after 1 month compared to FENA at 3Hrs post-study drug administration after 1 dose expressed as percent change, sitagliptin vs. placebo

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fractional Excretion of Lithium (FELi)3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 doseFELi at 3 Hr post-study drug administration after 1 month compared to FELI at 3hrs post-study drug administration after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs. placebo
Change From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^1-67 (Intact) Measured by Immunoaffinity and Tandem Mass Spectrometry3 Hr vs. baseline after 1 dosePlasma concentration of SDF-1alpha\^1-67 (intact) measured by quantitative mass spectrometry methods after antibody-based affinity enrichment, sitagliptin vs. placebo
Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 doseMeasured GFR (Inulin Clearance) at 3Hrs post study-drug after 1 month compared to Measured GFR at 3Hrs post-study drug after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs. placebo
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 doseSBP by Non-Invasive cardiac output monitoring at 3Hrs post- study drug administration after 1 month compared to SBP by Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring at 3Hrs after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs placebo
Change in Effective Renal Plasma Flow (ERPF)3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 doseERPF (para-aminohippurate clearance) 3Hrs post-study drug administration after 1 month compared to ERPF at 3Hhrs post-study drug administration after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs placebo
Change From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^3-67 (Truncated) Measured by Tandem Mass Spectrometry With Antibody-based Affinity Enrichment3Hrs vs baseline after 1 dosePlasma concentration of SDF-1alpha\^3-67 (intact) measured by quantitative mass spectrometry methods after antibody-based affinity enrichment, sitagliptin vs. placebo

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Arm
sitagliptin (DPP-4 inhibitor) oral tablet (100 mg); Januvia; administered once daily for 28 days Sitaglitpin: Oral DPP-4 inhibitor, 100 mg tablet administered once daily for 28 days
16
Placebo Arm
placebo (no medicinal ingredients) oral tablet (100 mg); administered once daily for 28 days Placebo: Oral tablet (no medicinal ingredients) administered once daily for 28 days
16
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo ArmTotalExperimental Arm
Age, Continuous59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Diabetes Duration8.5 years8.0 years6.0 years
HbA1c (%)7.31 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84
7.2 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
7.18 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants20 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 172 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENA)

FENA at 3Hrs post-study drug administration after 1 month compared to FENA at 3Hrs post-study drug administration after 1 dose expressed as percent change, sitagliptin vs. placebo

Time frame: 3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 dose

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental ArmPercent Change in Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENA)41 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 43
Placebo ArmPercent Change in Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENA)-5.0 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 31
p-value: =0.012Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^1-67 (Intact) Measured by Immunoaffinity and Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Plasma concentration of SDF-1alpha\^1-67 (intact) measured by quantitative mass spectrometry methods after antibody-based affinity enrichment, sitagliptin vs. placebo

Time frame: 3 Hr vs. baseline after 1 dose

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental ArmChange From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^1-67 (Intact) Measured by Immunoaffinity and Tandem Mass Spectrometry0.5 ng per mLStandard Deviation 0.2
Placebo ArmChange From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^1-67 (Intact) Measured by Immunoaffinity and Tandem Mass Spectrometry0 ng per mLStandard Deviation 0
p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^3-67 (Truncated) Measured by Tandem Mass Spectrometry With Antibody-based Affinity Enrichment

Plasma concentration of SDF-1alpha\^3-67 (intact) measured by quantitative mass spectrometry methods after antibody-based affinity enrichment, sitagliptin vs. placebo

Time frame: 3Hrs vs baseline after 1 dose

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental ArmChange From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^3-67 (Truncated) Measured by Tandem Mass Spectrometry With Antibody-based Affinity Enrichment-2.0 ng per mLStandard Deviation 0.4
Placebo ArmChange From Baseline in SDF-1alpha^3-67 (Truncated) Measured by Tandem Mass Spectrometry With Antibody-based Affinity Enrichment0.4 ng per mLStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Effective Renal Plasma Flow (ERPF)

ERPF (para-aminohippurate clearance) 3Hrs post-study drug administration after 1 month compared to ERPF at 3Hhrs post-study drug administration after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs placebo

Time frame: 3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 dose

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental ArmChange in Effective Renal Plasma Flow (ERPF)31.1 ml per min per 1.73 m2Standard Deviation 152.1
Placebo ArmChange in Effective Renal Plasma Flow (ERPF)-24.7 ml per min per 1.73 m2Standard Deviation 142.8
Secondary

Change in Fractional Excretion of Lithium (FELi)

FELi at 3 Hr post-study drug administration after 1 month compared to FELI at 3hrs post-study drug administration after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs. placebo

Time frame: 3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 dose

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental ArmChange in Fractional Excretion of Lithium (FELi)29 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 55
Placebo ArmChange in Fractional Excretion of Lithium (FELi)7 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 44
p-value: 0.15Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Measured GFR (Inulin Clearance) at 3Hrs post study-drug after 1 month compared to Measured GFR at 3Hrs post-study drug after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs. placebo

Time frame: 3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 dose

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental ArmChange in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)3.9 ml per min per 1.73 m2Standard Deviation 20.4
Placebo ArmChange in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)-1.8 ml per min per 1.73 m2Standard Deviation 17.8
p-value: 0.4Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring

SBP by Non-Invasive cardiac output monitoring at 3Hrs post- study drug administration after 1 month compared to SBP by Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring at 3Hrs after 1 dose, sitagliptin vs placebo

Time frame: 3 Hrs post-administration after 1 month and after 1 dose

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental ArmChange in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring5.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.9
Placebo ArmChange in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring0.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
p-value: 0.42Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026