Skip to content

Effect of Liquid Volume and the Amount of Incorporated Gas Into a Carbohydrate/Protein Beverage on Satiety

Effect of Liquid Volume and the Amount of Incorporated Gas Into a Carbohydrate/Protein Beverage on Satiety: a Response-surface-model Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02405494
Enrollment
96
Registered
2015-04-01
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2015-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appetite, Satiety

Brief summary

Liquid foams can be formed by trapping pockets of gas in a beverage. The primary objective of this study is to test the individual contribution, and possible interaction, of the liquid volume and gas to liquid volume ratio (i.e. %overrun (%OR, defined as 100 x \[gas volume/liquid volume\]) of a beverage to its satiating properties.

Detailed description

It is not known how the liquid and gas volumes of a liquid foam contribute to its satiating properties and how and if these factors interact. The best way to assess these parameter combinations and their interactions is to use a special statistical approach named Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The current study therefore has a Central Composite Design with 9 foams differing in liquid volume and in ratio of gas to liquid volume (%overrun, which is defined as 100 x gas volume/liquid volume). Each subject will be appointed to a single parameter combination and receives this parameter combination twice, separated by a one-week wash-out period. On both test days subjects' self-assessment of feelings of satiety and physical discomfort will be recorded during 4 hours post-consumption of the treatment using Electronic Visual Analogue Scale.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 1
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 2
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 3
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 4
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 5
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 6
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 7
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 8
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBeverage 9

Sponsors

Unilever R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* BMI between 21 and 32 kg/m² * Apparently healthy: measured by questionnaire: no reported current or previous metabolic diseases or chronic gastrointestinal disorders * Reported dietary habits: no medically prescribed diet, no slimming diet, used to eat 3 meals a day, no vegetarian. * Reported intense sporting activities below 10h/w * Reported alcohol consumption below 14 units/w (female volunteers) or below 21 units/w (male volunteers)

Exclusion criteria

* Dislike, allergy or intolerance to test products or indicating to be unable to consume 514 ml of aerated test product * Any food allergy, or dislike or intolerance with the foods supplied during the study * Eating disorder (measured by SCOFF questionnaire, 2 or moreyes responses) High or very high restrained eaters (measured by questionnaire; score of 15 or higher, Polivy et al. 1978) * Reported medical treatment that may affect eating habits/satiety * Reported lactating (or lactating \< 6 weeks ago), pregnant (or pregnant \< 6 months ago) or wish to become pregnant during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hunger and satiety questions (Area under the time curve of hunger and satiety scores (as rated by the subjects on a Visual Analog Scale)245 minutesArea under the time curve of hunger and satiety scores (as rated by the subjects on a Visual Analog Scale)

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026