Skip to content

Cerclage vs Cervical Pessary in Women With Cervical Incompetence

Cerclage vs Cervical Pessary in Women With Cervical Incompetence

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02405455
Acronym
CEPEIC
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-04-01
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2021-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Insufficiency

Keywords

cervical insufficiency, cervical cerclage, cervical pessary

Brief summary

Cervical insufficiency (CI), responsible for 8% of preterm births (PB), is used to describe painless cervical dilation leading to recurrent second-trimester pregnancy losses/births of otherwise normal pregnancies. Structural weakness of cervical tissue was thought to cause or contribute to these adverse outcomes. The term has also been applied to women with one or two such losses/births or at risk for second-trimester pregnancy loss/birth. Cervical pessary and cervical cerclage are both considered as preventive treatments in women at risk for PB. This study aims to demonstrate that the cervical pessary could reduce the preterm birth rate before 37 weeks of gestation in women with prior PB due to cervical insufficiency or in women with prior PB and a short cervix in the current pregnancy.

Detailed description

Methods/Design: This is an open-label, pilot, multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT). Enrolees are women with singleton pregnancies and previous PB based on CI (primary intervention, \<16 weeks) or in case of previous PB and a short cervical length in current pregnancy ≤ 25 mm (secondary intervention, \<24 weeks). Women are randomised (1:1) either to cervical cerclage or pessary treatment. The primary outcome is the spontaneous preterm birth rate before 34 weeks of gestation. The sample size was calculated, as a pilot study, based on the estimated population that we will be able to recruit during the duration of the trial: 60 women, 30 for each group (cervical cerclage and cervical pessary group) to observe, at least a reduction in the PB rate \< 34 weeks from 34% to 27% in the pessary group, as does cerclage. Discussion: The outcome of this study will show the effectiveness of a cervical cerclage and of a cervical pessary in this group of patients.

Interventions

PROCEDURECerclage

Surgical procedure which consists of a strong suture being inserted into and around the cervix to close it.

The Arabin cervical pessary, which is CE-certified for preventing spontaneous preterm birth (CE 0482 / EN ISO 13485: 2003 annex III of the council directive 93/42 EEC). It is a vaginal device which is used to treat pregnant women for preventing spontaneous preterm birth. This device can be easily placed around the uterine cervix without pain.

Sponsors

Maternal-Infantil Vall d´Hebron Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cervical pessary vs. Cervical cerclage

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Singleton pregnancy * Minimum age: 18 years * Previous PB based on CI (primary intervention, \<16 weeks) or in case of previous PB and a short cervical length in current pregnancy ≤ 25 mm (secondary intervention, \<24 weeks). Women are randomised (1:1) either to cervical cerclage or pessary treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Major fetal abnormalities (requiring surgery or leading to infant death or severe handicap) * Threatened preterm labour at time of randomization * Spontaneous rupture of membranes at time of randomization * Chorioamnionitis at time of randomization * Active vaginal bleeding * Placenta previa

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spontaneous delivery before 34 complete weeksBefore 34 weeks of gestationSpontaneous delivery before 34 complete weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spontaneous delivery before 28 complete weeksBefore 28 weeks of gestationSpontaneous delivery before 28 complete weeks
Spontaneous delivery before 37 complete weeksBefore 37 weeks of gestationSpontaneous delivery before 37 complete weeks
Foetal and neonatal deathDuring pregnancy and during the first 28 days of newborn or NICU stayFoetal and neonatal death
Neonatal morbidity28 days of newborn or during NICU stayNeonatal morbidity
Maternal side effectsDuring pregnancyMaternal side effects
Maternal morbidityduring pregnancyMaternal morbidity
Number of participants with chorioamnionitis infectionDuring pregnancyNumber of participants with chorioamnionitis infection
Hospitalisation for threatened preterm labourDuring pregnancyHospitalisation for threatened preterm labour

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026