Skip to content

Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy (Including Inhibition of Structural Damage), Safety and Tolerability up to 2 Years of Secukinumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Multi-center Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab (150 mg and 300 mg) in Prefilled Syringe to Demonstrate Efficacy (Including Inhibition of Structural Damage), Safety, and Tolerability up to 2 Years in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (FUTURE 5)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02404350
Acronym
FUTURE5
Enrollment
997
Registered
2015-03-31
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2019-01-24
Last updated
2020-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

Psoriatic Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriatic Arthropathy, Spondylitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate efficacy including effect on inhibition of progression of structural damage, safety and tolerability up to 2 years with primary focus at Week 16 (week 24 for structural damage), to support the use of secukinumab pre-filled syringe (PFS) by subcutaneous (s.c.) self-administration with or without loading regimen in subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) despite current or previous NSAID, DMARD therapy and/or previous anti-TNFα therapy. Long term efficacy up to 2 years was based on signs and symptoms of joint/bone structure preservation (X-ray) and improvement in physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI©), as well as skin and nail improvement for psoriasis signs.

Detailed description

This multicenter study uses a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. A screening period (SCR) running up to 10 weeks before randomization will be used to assess subject eligibility followed by 104 weeks of treatment. At BSL approximately 990 subjects whose eligibility is confirmed will be randomized to one of four treatment groups in 2:2:2:3 ratio: * Group 1 - secukinumab 150 mg s.c. without loading regimen * Group 2 - secukinumab 150 mg s.c. with loading dose regimen * Group 3 - secukinumab 300 mg s.c. with loading dose regimen * Group 4 - Placebo s.c. NOTE: Group 4 is split into 2 treatment arms, detailed description below. At randomization, subjects will be stratified on the basis of previous anti-TNF therapy as TNFα inhibitor naïve (TNF-naïve) or TNFα inhibitor inadequate responders (TNF-IR). At each study treatment visit, one (for secukinumab 150 mg) or two (for secukinumab 300 mg) s.c. injections in the form of PFS will be administered, since secukinumab is available in 1.0 mL (150 mg) PFSs. Placebo to secukinumab is also available in 1.0 mL to match the active drug. At Week 16, subjects who have been randomized to secukinumab groups at BSL (Groups 1-3) will be classified as either responders (≥20% improvement from BSL in both tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC)) or non-responders (\<20% improvement from BSL TJC or SJC), however they will continue on the same treatment irrespective of their response status. At Week 16, subjects who have been randomized to placebo at BSL (Group 4) will be classified as either responders (≥20% improvement from BSL in both TJC and SJC) or non-responders (\<20% improvement from BSL TJC or SJC): * Subjects who are non-responders will receive either secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 16 (as dictated by treatment sequence assigned to these subjects at BSL). * Subjects who are responders will continue to receive placebo every 4 weeks. Starting Week 24, these subjects will receive either secukinumab 150 mg s.c. or 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 24 (as dictated by treatment sequence assigned to these subjects at BSL). At Week 24, the assessments to address the primary objective will be performed. As described above, subjects who are still receiving placebo s.c. injection will receive either secukinumab 150 mg s.c. or 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 24 (as dictated by treatment sequence assigned to these subjects at BSL). At week 52, based on Investigator's decision, the subjects on a 150 mg dose whose signs and symptoms do not show satisfactory response have the possibility to be allocated to secukinumab 300 mg s.c. After the Week 52 database lock and analyses have been completed, site personnel and subjects will be unblinded to the original randomized treatment (sequence) assignment at randomization. In addition, treatment will be given open-label in order to eliminate the placebo injection. The subject will continue to receive the same active dose of secukinumab as open-label treatment administered until Week 100.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSecukinumab

Anti IL-17a monoclonal antibody

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of PsA classified by CASPAR criteria and with symptoms for at least 6 months with moderate to severe PsA who must have at BSL ≥3 tender joints out of 78 and ≥3 swollen joints out of 76 (dactylitis of a digit counts as one joint each). * Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies negative at screening. * Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis or nail changes consistent with psoriasis or a documented history of plaque psoriasis. * Subjects with PsA should have taken NSAIDs for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization with inadequate control of symptoms or at least one dose if stopped due to intolerance to NSAIDs.-Subjects who are regularly taking NSAIDs as part of their PsA therapy are required to be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks before study randomization and should remain on a stable dose up to Week 24. * Subjects taking corticosteroids must be on a stable dose of ≤10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for at least 2 weeks before randomization and should remain on a stable dose up to Week 24. * Subjects taking MTX (≤ 25 mg/week) are allowed to continue their medication if the dose is stable for at least 4 weeks before randomization and should remain on a stable dose up to Week 52. * Subjects on MTX must be on folic acid supplementation at randomization. * Subjects who are on a DMARD other than MTX must discontinue the DMARD 4 weeks prior to randomization visit except for leflunomide, which has to be discontinued for 8 weeks prior to randomization unless a cholestyramine wash-out has been performed. * Subjects who have been on a TNFα inhibitor must have experienced an inadequate response to previous or current treatment with a TNFα inhibitor given at an approved dose for at least 3 months or have stopped treatment due to safety/tolerability problems after at least one administration of a TNFα inhibitor. * Subjects who have previously been treated with TNFα inhibitors (investigational or approved) will be allowed entry into study after appropriate wash-out period prior to randomization

Exclusion criteria

Chest X-ray or chest MRI with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process. - Subjects taking high potency opioid analgesics. * Previous exposure to secukinumab or other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17 or IL-17 receptor. - Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments / medications (e.g., topical corticosteroids, UV therapy) at randomization. * Any intramuscular or intravenous or intra-articular corticosteroid treatment within 4 weeks before randomization. * Subjects who have ever received biologic immunomodulating agents except for those targeting TNFα (investigational or approved). * Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies including but not limited to anti- CD20, investigational agents * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Response 20 (ACR20) at Week 16Week 16ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 20% improvement based on tender 78-joint count, swollen 76-joint count and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: participant's assessment of PsA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score), and acute phase reactant evaluated as (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Count and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) ResponseWeek 16The efficacy of secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) response.
Count and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response16 weeksThe efficacy of secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) response.
Count and Percentage of Patients Achieving an ACR50 Response16 weeksACR 50 Response is a measure based on American College of Rheumatology criteria of at least a 50% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function measured using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))Baseline, Week 24PsA modified vdH-mTSS scoring method was used to assess bone erosion & joint space narrowing (JSN) in hands & feet; that included the 2nd through 5th distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints of each hand. Maximum score for erosions was 5 in joints of the hands and 10 in joints of the feet with 0=no erosions, 1=discrete erosion, 2=large erosion not passing the mid-line, and 3=large erosion passing the mid-line. JSN is: 0=normal, 1=asymmetrical or minimal narrowing up to a maximum of 25%, 2 = definite narrowing with loss of up to 50% of the normal space, 3 = definite narrowing with loss of 50-99% of the normal space, and 4 = absence of a joint space. Maximum erosion score is 320 (200 for the hands and 120 for the feet), and the max total JSN score is 208 (160 for the hands and 48 for the feet). Total radiographic score (hands & feet combined) ranges from 0 to 528, where higher scores indicate more articular damage
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP))16 weeksThe improvement on secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo for the disease activity assessed by the changes in Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28-CRP) (utilizing High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)) relative to baseline. Scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do)
Count and Percentage of Patients With Enthesitis in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline16 weeksThe efficacy of secukinumab pooled regimen (150 mg with or without loading regimen, and 300 mg with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients with enthesitis in the subset of patients who had enthesitis at baseline
Count and Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis in the Subset of Patients Who Have Dactylitis at Baseline16 weeksThe efficacy of secukinumab pooled regimen (150 mg with or without loading regimen, and 300 mg with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients with dactylitis in the subset of patients who have dactylitis at baseline
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI© Score16 weeksThe change (within treatment) on secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen), at Week 16 compared with placebo for the disease activity assessed by the changes in The Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) relative to baseline.

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at 173 centers in 28 countries.

Pre-assignment details

996 were randomized and dosed, of which 932 participants completed 24 weeks of treatment. Out of the 64 participants who discontinued the most common reasons were participant/guardian decision (32) and adverse events (16).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Secukinumab 150 mg Without Load
Participants were s.c. administered with 150 milligrams (mg) of secukinumab as 1 mL PFS and secukinumab matching placebo (1 mL PFS) at baseline. Participants received secukinumab matching placebo (2\*1 mL PFS) at Weeks 1, 2 and 3. From week 4 participants received secukinumab 150 mg (1 mL PFS) and secukinumab matching placebo (1 mL PFS) every four weeks up to 100 weeks.
222
Secukinumab 150 mg With Load
Participants were s.c. administered with 150 mg of secukinumab as 1 mL PFS and secukinumab matching placebo (1 mL PFS) at baseline, weeks 1, 2 and 3, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4 up to 100.
220
Secukinumab 300 mg With Load
Participants were s.c. administered with 300 mg of secukinumab as 2\*1 mL PFS (150 mg dose) at baseline, weeks 1, 2 and 3, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4 up to 100 weeks.
222
Placebo
Participants were s.c. administered with secukinumab matching placebo (2\*1 mL PFS) at baseline, weeks 1, 2 and 3, followed by dosing every four weeks starting at Week 4. Participants were further randomized to two different treatment sequences in 1:1 ratio at baseline as secukinumab matching placebo till Week 16/24 followed by secukinumab 150 mg every 4 weeks starting at Week 16/24 up to 100 weeks and secukinumab matching placebo till Week 16/24 followed by secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks starting at Week 16/24 up to 100 weeks.
332
Total996

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event2239
Overall StudyDue to Non-compliance with treatment0001
Overall StudyDue to Technical problems0001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3103
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1002
Overall StudyPregnancy0001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject73319

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSecukinumab 150 mg Without LoadSecukinumab 150 mg With LoadSecukinumab 300 mg With LoadPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.82
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.87
48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.12
48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants30 Participants31 Participants51 Participants137 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
180 Participants160 Participants174 Participants251 Participants765 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
17 Participants30 Participants17 Participants30 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
102 Participants109 Participants114 Participants171 Participants496 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
120 Participants111 Participants108 Participants161 Participants500 Participants
Subjects with psoriasis ≥ 3% of BSA
No
105 Participants95 Participants112 Participants170 Participants482 Participants
Subjects with psoriasis ≥ 3% of BSA
Yes
117 Participants125 Participants110 Participants162 Participants514 Participants
Subjects with psoriasis of hands and feet
No
89 Participants85 Participants95 Participants158 Participants427 Participants
Subjects with psoriasis of hands and feet
Yes
133 Participants135 Participants127 Participants174 Participants569 Participants
Subjects with psoriasis of nail
No
69 Participants85 Participants78 Participants101 Participants333 Participants
Subjects with psoriasis of nail
Yes
153 Participants135 Participants144 Participants231 Participants663 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2220 / 2200 / 2220 / 8220 / 332
other
Total, other adverse events
95 / 22282 / 22083 / 222275 / 822127 / 332
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 2229 / 2207 / 22225 / 82212 / 332

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Response 20 (ACR20) at Week 16

ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 20% improvement based on tender 78-joint count, swollen 76-joint count and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: participant's assessment of PsA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score), and acute phase reactant evaluated as (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The analysis was performed in Full Analysis Set (FAS) population defined as all randomized participants assigned to study treatment. Following the intent-to-treat principle, participants were analyzed according to treatment assigned at randomization by actual anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) status. Missing responses were imputed as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadPercentage of Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Response 20 (ACR20) at Week 1659.5 percentage of participants
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadPercentage of Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Response 20 (ACR20) at Week 1655.5 percentage of participants
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadPercentage of Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Response 20 (ACR20) at Week 1662.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Response 20 (ACR20) at Week 1627.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Statistical values were calculated from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-a status -naive or Incidence Rate) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.78, 5.79]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Statistical values were calculated from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-a status -naive or Incidence Rate) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.35, 4.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Statistical values were calculated from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-a status -naive or Incidence Rate) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.16, 6.63]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP))

The improvement on secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo for the disease activity assessed by the changes in Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28-CRP) (utilizing High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)) relative to baseline. Scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do)

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP))-1.29 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.074
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP))-1.29 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP))-1.49 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.074
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28-CRP) (Utilizing High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP))-0.63 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.062
Comparison: Mixed model with treatment regimen, analysis visit and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors, weight and baseline score as continuous covariates, and treatment by analysis visit and baseline score by analysis visit as interaction terms, using an unstructured covariance structurep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.85, -0.47]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed model with treatment regimen, analysis visit and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors, weight and baseline score as continuous covariates, and treatment by analysis visit and baseline score by analysis visit as interaction terms, using an unstructured covariance structurep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.85, -0.47]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed model with treatment regimen, analysis visit and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors, weight and baseline score as continuous covariates, and treatment by analysis visit and baseline score by analysis visit as interaction terms, using an unstructured covariance structurep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.05, -0.67]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI© Score

The change (within treatment) on secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen), at Week 16 compared with placebo for the disease activity assessed by the changes in The Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) relative to baseline.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI© Score-0.45 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI© Score-0.44 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI© Score-0.55 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI© Score-0.21 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.32, -0.15]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.32, -0.14]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.42, -0.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))

PsA modified vdH-mTSS scoring method was used to assess bone erosion & joint space narrowing (JSN) in hands & feet; that included the 2nd through 5th distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints of each hand. Maximum score for erosions was 5 in joints of the hands and 10 in joints of the feet with 0=no erosions, 1=discrete erosion, 2=large erosion not passing the mid-line, and 3=large erosion passing the mid-line. JSN is: 0=normal, 1=asymmetrical or minimal narrowing up to a maximum of 25%, 2 = definite narrowing with loss of up to 50% of the normal space, 3 = definite narrowing with loss of 50-99% of the normal space, and 4 = absence of a joint space. Maximum erosion score is 320 (200 for the hands and 120 for the feet), and the max total JSN score is 208 (160 for the hands and 48 for the feet). Total radiographic score (hands & feet combined) ranges from 0 to 528, where higher scores indicate more articular damage

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population with a measurement that could be evaluated. Participants in placebo group, rescued at Week 16 were also extrapolated (i.e. treated as missing at Week 24).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))baseline15.25 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 37.098
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))change-0.10 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 2.872
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))change0.13 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 1.222
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))baseline13.50 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 25.636
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))baseline12.90 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 23.781
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))change0.02 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 1.336
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))baseline14.95 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 38.236
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 With Secukinumab Compared With Placebo for Joint/Bone Structural Damage (Using Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS))change0.50 Mean Sharp ScoreStandard Deviation 1.708
Comparison: Secukinumab 300 mg With Load compared to Placebo Estimate (for the difference in mean), SE and p-value are from a non-parametric ANCOVA model (Koch, 1998) with the change from baseline van der Heijde total modified Sharp score (or Erosion Score or Joint Space Narrowing Score) as the dependent variable, treatment and randomization stratum (TNFa status -naive or IR ) as factors, and weight and baseline van der Heijde total modified Sharp score as covariates.p-value: 0.0061Non-parametric ANCOVA model
Comparison: Secukinumab 300 mg With Load compared to Placebo Estimate (for the difference in mean), SE and p-value are from a non-parametric ANCOVA model (Koch, 1998) with the change from baseline van der Heijde total modified Sharp score (or Erosion Score or Joint Space Narrowing Score) as the dependent variable, treatment and randomization stratum (TNFa status -naive or IR ) as factors, and weight and baseline van der Heijde total modified Sharp score as covariates.p-value: 0.0048Non-parametric ANCOVA model
Comparison: Secukinumab 300 mg With Load compared to Placebo Estimate (for the difference in mean), SE and p-value are from a non-parametric ANCOVA model (Koch, 1998) with the change from baseline van der Heijde total modified Sharp score (or Erosion Score or Joint Space Narrowing Score) as the dependent variable, treatment and randomization stratum (TNFa status -naive or IR ) as factors, and weight and baseline van der Heijde total modified Sharp score as covariates.p-value: 0.0003Non-parametric ANCOVA model
Secondary

Count and Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis in the Subset of Patients Who Have Dactylitis at Baseline

The efficacy of secukinumab pooled regimen (150 mg with or without loading regimen, and 300 mg with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients with dactylitis in the subset of patients who have dactylitis at baseline

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Dactylitis subset: The dactylitis subset included all FAS patients who had dactylitis at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadCount and Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis in the Subset of Patients Who Have Dactylitis at Baseline45 Participants
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis in the Subset of Patients Who Have Dactylitis at Baseline34 Participants
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis in the Subset of Patients Who Have Dactylitis at Baseline28 Participants
PlaceboCount and Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis in the Subset of Patients Who Have Dactylitis at Baseline84 Participants
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [0.22, 0.65]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [0.19, 0.6]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.13, 0.44]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Count and Percentage of Patients Achieving an ACR50 Response

ACR 50 Response is a measure based on American College of Rheumatology criteria of at least a 50% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function measured using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving an ACR50 Response71 Participants
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving an ACR50 Response79 Participants
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving an ACR50 Response88 Participants
PlaceboCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving an ACR50 Response27 Participants
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.3, 8.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.93, 10.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.61, 12]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Count and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response

The efficacy of secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) response.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Psoriasis subset: The psoriasis subset included all FAS patients who had ≥ 3% of the BSA affected by psoriatic skin involvement at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response68 Participants
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response75 Participants
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response77 Participants
PlaceboCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response20 Participants
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.52, 18.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [6.37, 21.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [9.56, 34.12]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Count and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response

The efficacy of secukinumab 150 mg (with or without loading regimen), or 300 mg (with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) response.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Psoriasis subset: The psoriasis subset included all FAS patients who had ≥ 3% of the BSA affected by psoriatic skin involvement at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response37 Participants
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response46 Participants
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response59 Participants
PlaceboCount and Percentage of Patients Achieving Psoriatic Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response15 Participants
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.~Missing responses are imputed as non-responders.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.31, 8.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.~Missing responses are imputed as non-responders.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.18, 11.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value are from a logistic regression model with treatment and randomization stratum (TNF-alpha status -naïve or IR) as factors and baseline weight as a covariate.~Missing responses are imputed as non-responders.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [6.43, 24.48]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Count and Percentage of Patients With Enthesitis in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline

The efficacy of secukinumab pooled regimen (150 mg with or without loading regimen, and 300 mg with loading regimen) at Week 16 compared with placebo based on the proportion of patients with enthesitis in the subset of patients who had enthesitis at baseline

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Enthesitis subset: The enthesitis subset included all FAS patients who had enthesitis at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Secukinumab 150 mg Without LoadCount and Percentage of Patients With Enthesitis in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline75 Participants
Secukinumab 150 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients With Enthesitis in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline64 Participants
Secukinumab 300 mg With LoadCount and Percentage of Patients With Enthesitis in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline62 Participants
PlaceboCount and Percentage of Patients With Enthesitis in the Subset of Patients Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline124 Participants
p-value: 0.22595% CI: [0.47, 1.19]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [0.29, 0.7]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [0.28, 0.69]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026