Skip to content

Behavioral Economic Interventions at Food Pantries

An Analysis of Behavioral Economic Interventions at Client-Choice Food Pantries

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02403882
Enrollment
443
Registered
2015-03-31
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2016-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Selection

Keywords

behavioral economics, food pantry, food choice

Brief summary

The investigators run a series of behavioral economic interventions at client-choice food pantries to encourage clients to choose targeted foods.

Detailed description

The study includes simple interventions at food pantries in New York State. In the initial phase, the investigators are testing the effect of order, packaging, pricing products, and relative proportion of products at a food pantry.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOrder

In the order intervention, the investigators place the targeted product at the front of the line for the treatment. For the control, the investigators place the targeted product at the end of the line.

BEHAVIORALPackaging

In the packaging intervention, the investigator present the targeted product in the original package. In the control, the investigator repackage the targeted product in clear, plastic bags.

BEHAVIORALPricing

In the pricing intervention, the investigators price all or targeted products in the treatment. In the control, the investigators do not price the products.

BEHAVIORALRelative Proportions

The investigators adjust the amount of the targeted good available relative to the other products. In the treatment, the targeted good is a larger proportion of the total goods offered in the section, while in the control the shares of the targeted and other goods are equal.

BEHAVIORALDefault Option

In an early site, the investigators offer a targeted product without an alternative. The subjects can accept or reject the offer. The subjects are told that an alternative product is available later. At the site where the alternative product is available, investigators offer subjects the opportunity to exchanged the targeted product for the alternative product.

Sponsors

Cornell University
CollaboratorOTHER
Auburn University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Client in food pantry

Exclusion criteria

* Minors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Targeted Products Selected Relative to Othersup to 8 monthsAs subjects choose products from sections of the food pantry, the investigators observe the selection of the targeted product among the other products available. If the targeted product is selected the investigators denote it with a one and zero otherwise. The investigators average the outcome over five and 10 subjects. The investigators also use probit and logistic models to estimate the probability of uptake.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026