Skip to content

Factors Involved in Dymista's Superior Clinical Efficacy in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Evaluating Factors Involved in Dymista's Superior Clinical Efficacy to Fluticasone Propionate in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02402465
Enrollment
22
Registered
2015-03-30
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2020-02-29
Last updated
2024-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Brief summary

Dymista, a combined product containing the antihistamine azelastine and the intranasal steroid fluticasone, provides superior clinical efficacy to both fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The superiority of efficacy not only occurs at the initiation of treatment, but persists for its duration. The mechanism underlying the superior efficacy of Dymista is not known. This trial focuses on examining the effects of Dymista on the dynamics of the allergic response in man using nasal provocation with antigen. The investigators will study the relationship between symptoms, physiology, cells and mediators.

Detailed description

The main hypothesis for the trial is that Dymista affects multiple phases of the allergic response, which in sum are greater than the effects of fluticasone propionate or azelastine hydrochloride alone. Our objectives for this study are to demonstrate: 1. that the induction of allergic inflammation by nasal provocation with antigen causes a cellular infiltration, with subsequent release of inflammatory biomarkers that cause augmented responses to subsequent exposure to antigens. 2. that fluticasone prevents allergic inflammation from developing after antigen challenge and subsequently prevents the augmentation of the nasal response to nasal challenge with antigen. 3. that the azelastine in Dymista reduces the effects of released histamine To address these hypotheses we will perform a 3-way, randomized, placebo-controlled, and crossover trial. We will recruit 20 asymptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis patients outside of the relevant season. The subjects will receive placebo, fluticasone propionate and Dymista. The nasal provocations will be separated by 2 weeks. Treatment will begin 15 minutes before nasal provocation with ragweed or grass antigen and the treatment will continue twice a day for 3 days. Nasal provocation will occur daily for three days to evaluate for priming (increased sensitization with repeated antigen exposure, which mimics seasonal disease where antigen exposure occurs in the setting of continued allergic inflammation). For outcome measures, we will monitor both nasal symptoms after nasal provocation as well as collect nasal lavage to evaluate effects on eosinophils and biomarkers of the immune response. In the nasal lavage, we will quantify the number of eosinophils (a marker of cellular recruitment) and measure the levels of histamine (a marker of basophil and mast cell activation), tryptase (a marker of mast cell activation), albumin (a marker of vascular permeability), lactoferrin (a marker of glandular activation) and ECP (a marker of eosinophil activation). Thus we expect to generate information on both clinical effects and physiologic differences between the treatments.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Patients will be treated by placebo

DRUGFluticasone propionate

Patients will receive fluticasone nasal spray

DRUGFluticasone/Azelastine nasal spray

Patients will receive Dymista nasal spray

All subjects will receive a nasal challenge with allergen to mimick an allergic response and allow the investigation of the different drug effects on that response. Allergen extracts will be used as sprays into the nasal cavity. The extracts are approved by FDA for skin testing or desensitization therapy and an IND was obtained to allow intranasal administration

Sponsors

University of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females between 18 and 55 years of age. 2. History of grass and/or ragweed allergic rhinitis. 3. Positive skin test to grass and/or ragweed antigen. 4. Positive response to screening nasal challenge. 5. Off all anti-allergic medications for a minimum of 2 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

1. Physical signs or symptoms suggestive of renal, hepatic or cardiovascular disease. 2. Pregnant or lactating women. 3. Upper respiratory infection within 14 days of study start.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challenge3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (albumin amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sneezes After Allergen Challenge3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges. The final value is (the number of sneezes after 1st allergen exposure - number after sham) + (number of sneezes after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eosinophils3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (number of eosinophils in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - number after sham) + (number in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham number).
Histamine3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (histamine amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).
Total Nasal Symptom Score3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Total nasal symptom Score = Sum of itchy, runny, sneezing, and congestion scores, each on scale 0-3 (0=no symptoms, 1=mild symptoms, 2=moderate symptoms, 3=severe symptoms). Thus, maximum=12, minimum=0, and higher score represents worse outcome. Measured in the 10 minute period after allergen challenge and normalized against symptoms experienced after sham challenge.
Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (ECP amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).
Tryptase3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (tryptase amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).
Change From Baseline Response in Lactoferrin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challenge3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (lactoferrin amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

cross-over study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dymista/Placebo/Flonase
Dymista: Fluticasone/Azelastine nasal spray Flonase: Fluticasone nasal spray Placebo: nasal spray without active ingredient
4
Dymista/Flonase/Placebo
Dymista: Fluticasone/Azelastine nasal spray Flonase: Fluticasone nasal spray Placebo: nasal spray without active ingredient
3
Placebo/Dymista/Flonase
Dymista: Fluticasone/Azelastine nasal spray Flonase: Fluticasone nasal spray Placebo: nasal spray without active ingredient
4
Placebo/Flonase/Dymista
Dymista: Fluticasone/Azelastine nasal spray Flonase: Fluticasone nasal spray Placebo: nasal spray without active ingredient
4
Flonase/Dymista/Placebo
Dymista: Fluticasone/Azelastine nasal spray Flonase: Fluticasone nasal spray Placebo: nasal spray without active ingredient
1
Flonase/Placebo/Dymista
Dymista: Fluticasone/Azelastine nasal spray Flonase: Fluticasone nasal spray Placebo: nasal spray without active ingredient
3
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject000001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDymista/Flonase/PlaceboPlacebo/Dymista/FlonasePlacebo/Flonase/DymistaFlonase/Dymista/PlaceboFlonase/Placebo/DymistaDymista/Placebo/FlonaseTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants4 Participants4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants19 Participants
Age, Continuous29 years29 years27 years42 years36 years34.5 years34 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants4 participants4 participants1 participants3 participants4 participants19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 190 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 190 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 190 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challenge

Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (albumin amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 2-41.87 ng/mLStandard Error 59.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 1-33.61 ng/mLStandard Error 53.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 3-106.68 ng/mLStandard Error 46.08
Fluticasone PropionateChange From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 2-29.70 ng/mLStandard Error 72.14
Fluticasone PropionateChange From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 1-82.2 ng/mLStandard Error 54.22
Fluticasone PropionateChange From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 3-78.73 ng/mLStandard Error 58.44
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Change From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 1-185.85 ng/mLStandard Error 158.04
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Change From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 3-69.50 ng/mLStandard Error 35.49
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Change From Baseline Response in Albumin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challengeday 2-81.6 ng/mLStandard Error 32.36
p-value: >0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Sneezes After Allergen Challenge

Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges. The final value is (the number of sneezes after 1st allergen exposure - number after sham) + (number of sneezes after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSneezes After Allergen Challengeday 39.0 SneezesStandard Error 2.5
PlaceboSneezes After Allergen ChallengeDay 29.3 SneezesStandard Error 2.6
PlaceboSneezes After Allergen Challengeday 16.2 SneezesStandard Error 2.2
Fluticasone PropionateSneezes After Allergen Challengeday 37.1 SneezesStandard Error 2
Fluticasone PropionateSneezes After Allergen Challengeday 16.8 SneezesStandard Error 1.6
Fluticasone PropionateSneezes After Allergen ChallengeDay 27.6 SneezesStandard Error 2.2
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Sneezes After Allergen Challengeday 32.1 SneezesStandard Error 0.9
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Sneezes After Allergen ChallengeDay 22.0 SneezesStandard Error 0.9
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Sneezes After Allergen Challengeday 11.1 SneezesStandard Error 0.5
p-value: 0.001Friedman
p-value: 0.02Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.53Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline Response in Lactoferrin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challenge

Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (lactoferrin amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

Population: There was one missing sample

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Response in Lactoferrin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challenge131368 ng/mLStandard Error 67483
Fluticasone PropionateChange From Baseline Response in Lactoferrin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challenge137539 ng/mLStandard Error 40363
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Change From Baseline Response in Lactoferrin Levels in Nasal Lavage Following Each Challenge31400 ng/mLStandard Error 44982
p-value: 0.08Friedman's Test
Other Pre-specified

Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)

Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (ECP amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboEosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 244.5 ng/mLStandard Error 13.18
PlaceboEosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 147.08 ng/mLStandard Error 14.67
PlaceboEosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 342.4 ng/mLStandard Error 10.25
Fluticasone PropionateEosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 236.13 ng/mLStandard Error 11
Fluticasone PropionateEosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 147.8 ng/mLStandard Error 13.46
Fluticasone PropionateEosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 337.91 ng/mLStandard Error 10.77
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 151.62 ng/mLStandard Error 13.03
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 353.33 ng/mLStandard Error 16.14
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)day 246.32 ng/mLStandard Error 14.65
p-value: 0.85Friedman's Test
Other Pre-specified

Eosinophils

Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (number of eosinophils in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - number after sham) + (number in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham number).

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

Population: due technical difficulty in the staining, no data is available.

Other Pre-specified

Histamine

Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (histamine amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

Population: there were three missing samples

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHistamine-0.97 ng/mLStandard Error 1.2
Fluticasone PropionateHistamine10.3 ng/mLStandard Error 7.6
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Histamine12.3 ng/mLStandard Error 9.8
p-value: 0.04Friedman's Test
Other Pre-specified

Total Nasal Symptom Score

Total nasal symptom Score = Sum of itchy, runny, sneezing, and congestion scores, each on scale 0-3 (0=no symptoms, 1=mild symptoms, 2=moderate symptoms, 3=severe symptoms). Thus, maximum=12, minimum=0, and higher score represents worse outcome. Measured in the 10 minute period after allergen challenge and normalized against symptoms experienced after sham challenge.

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTotal Nasal Symptom Scoreday 26.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
PlaceboTotal Nasal Symptom Scoreday 16.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
PlaceboTotal Nasal Symptom Scoreday 35.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.07
Fluticasone PropionateTotal Nasal Symptom Scoreday 26.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.91
Fluticasone PropionateTotal Nasal Symptom Scoreday 17.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.08
Fluticasone PropionateTotal Nasal Symptom Scoreday 35.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Total Nasal Symptom Scoreday 13.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Total Nasal Symptom Scoreday 34.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Total Nasal Symptom Scoreday 24.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
Comparison: We used Friedman test to compare the distribution of total nasal symptom scores among three treatment groups (Placebo, Fluticasone propionate, Dymista) in each of the three days (day 1, day 2, and day 3).p-value: 0.07Friedman's Test
Other Pre-specified

Tryptase

Our procedure used a diluent (sham) challenge followed by 2 allergen challenges where lavages are collected 10 minutes after each of these challenges. The final value is (tryptase amount in lavage after 1st allergen exposure - amount after sham) + (amount in lavage after 2nd exposure - sham amount).

Time frame: 3 rounds of 1 Nasal challenge every 3 days followed by 2 week washout periods in between. Total participation of 9 weeks.

Population: Data was missing for 3 subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTryptase-0.08 ng/mlStandard Error 0.28
Fluticasone PropionateTryptase-0.19 ng/mlStandard Error 0.39
Dymista (Fluticasone/Azelastine)Tryptase0.12 ng/mlStandard Error 0.26
p-value: >0.05Friedman's Test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026