Skip to content

Host Modulatory Effects of β-glucan on Localized Aggressive Periodontitis

Efficacy of β-glucan in Treatment of Localized Aggressive Periodontitis: A Short Term Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02402296
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-03-30
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2015-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Localized Aggressive Periodontitis

Brief summary

combining the non-surgical therapy with a well-tolerated substance that can stimulate protective immune responses like B-glucan, might effectively mount resolution pathways contributing to resolving of the chronic lesion observed in aggressive forms of periodontal disease.

Detailed description

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of β-glucan supplementation to non-surgical periodontal therapy in localized aggressive periodontitis (LAP) patients. Method: 30 subjects were randomly and equally assigned to receive scaling and root planing; either with placebo pills (Group I) or β-glucan (100 mg/once a day) (Group II), for 40 days. Subjects were clinically monitored on day 0 and day 91. Gingival samples were harvested from hopeless teeth sites to be investigated histologically and immunohistochemically using matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and 9 antibodies form each patient; at the same time intervals.

Interventions

DRUGβ-1,3/1,6-D-glucan

15 patients (in group II) suffering from localized aggressive periodontitis followed a strict plaque control program (within two weeks); followed by a systemic course of β-1,3/1,6-D-glucan oral supplementation for 40 days.

OTHERPlacebo

15 patients (in group I) suffering from localized aggressive periodontitis followed a strict plaque control program (within two weeks); followed by a systemic course of placebo capsules oral supplementation for 40 days.

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 27 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Except for periodontitis, patients were systemically healthy as evaluated by modified Cornell medical index. * No more than two teeth other than first molars and incisors, with probing depth (PD) ≥ 5mm, bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) ≥ 5mm. * Rapid rate of attachment loss and bone destruction. * A radiographic examination revealing an evidence of moderate to severe vertical bone loss around permanent incisors and first molar teeth. * Every patient should have at least 20 teeth excluding third (3rd) molars, and at least an extraction-indicated tooth for a dento-periodontal affection. * Familial aggregation.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous subgingival scaling and root planing, allergy to β-glucan, smoking, former smoking, pregnancy, need of antibiotic coverage for routine dental therapy, antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months and allergy to chlorhexidine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)Day 0 and day 91 post therapyIt is the distance from the base of the pocket till the cemento-enamel junction using Williams graduated probe

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pocket Depth (PD)Day 0 and day 91 post therapyIt is the distance from the base of the pocket till the gingival margin using Williams graduated probe
Gingival Index (GI)Day 0 and day 91 post therapyUsing the values of the gingival index according to (Loe & Silness, 1963); 0-no bleeding on probing 1. delayed bleeding on probing 2. immediate bleeding on probing 3. spontaneous bleeding
Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9)Day 0 and day 91 post therapyTheir immuno-expression was assessed in the gingival samples harvested from the gingiva adjacent to hopeless teeth (planned to be extracted for dento-periodontal causes)

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group II (Test Group)
Included those patients who received a systemic β-1,3/1,6-D-glucan (100 mg capsule) once/ day for 40 days after scaling and root planing. β-1,3/1,6-D-glucan: 15 patients (in group II) suffering from localized aggressive periodontitis followed a strict plaque control program (within two weeks); followed by a systemic course of β-1,3/1,6-D-glucan oral supplementation for 40 days.
15
Group I (Control Group)
Was assigned for patients who had scaling and root planing and empty capsules filled with carbohydrates (placebo) for 40 days. Placebo: 15 patients (in group I) suffering from localized aggressive periodontitis followed a strict plaque control program (within two weeks); followed by a systemic course of placebo capsules oral supplementation for 40 days.
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup I (Control Group)Group II (Test Group)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.94
24.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.37
24.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
Region of Enrollment
Egypt
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

It is the distance from the base of the pocket till the cemento-enamel junction using Williams graduated probe

Time frame: Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

Population: A total of 30 localized aggressive periodontitis (LAP) participants were included in this study. Medical and dental histories were obtained and intraoral examinations were carried out at pre-screening visit. Patients were diagnosed to have LAP based on the clinical and radiographic findings measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Control Group)Assessment of Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)-14.07 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 12.29
Group II (Test Group)Assessment of Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)-37.48 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 17.69
Secondary

Gingival Index (GI)

Using the values of the gingival index according to (Loe & Silness, 1963); 0-no bleeding on probing 1. delayed bleeding on probing 2. immediate bleeding on probing 3. spontaneous bleeding

Time frame: Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

Population: A total of 30 localized aggressive periodontitis(LAP) participants were included in this study. Medical and dental histories were obtained and intraoral examinations were carried out at pre-screening visit. Patients were diagnosed to have LAP based on the clinical and radiographic findings.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Control Group)Gingival Index (GI)-0.87 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 0.83
Group II (Test Group)Gingival Index (GI)-75.56 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 25.87
Secondary

Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9)

Their immuno-expression was assessed in the gingival samples harvested from the gingiva adjacent to hopeless teeth (planned to be extracted for dento-periodontal causes)

Time frame: Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

Population: A total of 30 localized aggressive periodontitis(LAP) participants were included in this study. Medical and dental histories were obtained and intraoral examinations were carried out at pre-screening visit. Patients were diagnosed to have LAP based on the clinical and radiographic findings.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Control Group)Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9)Percentage of change (Matrix metallo-proteinase 1)-24.7 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 4.2
Group I (Control Group)Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9)Percentage of change (Matrix metallo-proteinase 9)-21.7 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 3.9
Group II (Test Group)Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9)Percentage of change (Matrix metallo-proteinase 1)-29.5 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 5.6
Group II (Test Group)Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9)Percentage of change (Matrix metallo-proteinase 9)-36.7 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Pocket Depth (PD)

It is the distance from the base of the pocket till the gingival margin using Williams graduated probe

Time frame: Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

Population: A total of 30 localized aggressive periodontitis(LAP) participants were included in this study. Medical and dental histories were obtained and intraoral examinations were carried out at pre-screening visit. Patients were diagnosed to have LAP based on the clinical and radiographic findings

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Control Group)Pocket Depth (PD)-21.84 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 17.12
Group II (Test Group)Pocket Depth (PD)-37.01 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 12.31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026