Skip to content

Central Venous Catheter Insertion Train the Trainer

Dissemination of a Simulation-based Mastery Learning Curriculum for Central Venous Catheter Insertion at Veterans Affairs Hospitals: A Quantitative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02402257
Enrollment
226
Registered
2015-03-30
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Central Venous Catheter, Simulation-based Mastery Learning, Medical Education, Patient Outcomes, Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous Catheter, Pneumothorax, Inadvertent Arterial Puncture

Brief summary

The investigators previously successfully implemented a central venous catheter (CVC) simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum at Northwestern University. As a result, trainee skill improved, complications, including central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) decreased and the curriculum was proven cost-effective. Therefore the Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMC) decided to implement this training at some of their sites as a quality improvement project. The investigators will train faculty at these locations to implement the same curriculum at their individual sites. Outcome data will be collected to evaluate the outcomes of the quality improvement (QI) project (complications, infections, skills).

Detailed description

Beginning in 2006, Northwestern University Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine residents completed simulation-based mastery learning in central venous catheter (CVC) insertion before clinical rotations in the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). This comprehensive program in central line training used repetitive practice and simulation technology to train residents to mastery standards. This study had important patient safety implications. This program resulted in improved trainee skill and reduced CVC insertion complications, including a significant decrease in the rate of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). In addition, the investigators showed that the in CVC insertion was highly cost-effective suggesting that investment in simulation training can produce significant medical care cost savings. This curriculum has now been successfully implemented at a few other sites. Due to the investigators' success, the VA has requested that Medical Error Reduction and Certification, Inc.(MERCI) along with Northwestern University, implements the curriculum at its sites across the county as a quality improvement project. Using a train the trainer course in CVC placement, the investigators are interested in analyzing the data that the VAMC will provide to MERCI and studying the outcomes. Four Northwestern faculty completed a CVC insertion Master trainer curriculum. One master trainer travels to each VA facility in the program to facilitate a two-day train-the-trainer course on CVC insertion SBML. Each VA facility selects one or two faculty champions who complete CVC insertion SBML course and learn how to teach the curriculum on day 1 and are observed training and assessing peer healthcare providers at their institution on day 2. Course materials include standardized videos and lectures, role-playing and practice with sample learners and CVC insertion assessments. In addition to the onsite master trainer, each VA facility receives necessary training materials (standardized video lectures, data collection forms, assessment tools) and equipment (CentralLineMan simulators, ultrasound) to implement the curriculum at their institution. All participants complete pre and post testing and a course evaluation questionnaire. Quantitative outcome data on learner skills and CVC insertion quality measures are collected to measure the overall success of the project.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCVC Train the Trainer

Trainees receive a simulation-based mastery learning intervention and train-the-trainer program on central venous catheter insertion

Sponsors

Medical Error Reduction and Certification, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Previously (or prospectively) collected de-identified data on trainee skill and experience 2. Previously (or prospectively) collected de-identified data on patients in the VA ICU with CVCs 3. Previously (or prospectively) collected de-identified data on mechanical complications in the ICUs

Exclusion criteria

1. Data not de-identified 2. Data on pts on non-ICU units 3. Data on pts without CVCs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effectiveness of simulation based mastery learning for CVC insertion on CLABSIs3 yearsData from infection control on central line associated bloodstream infections will be reported for all sites each month. The investigators plan to compare the trained ICU's infection rates with other ICUs at other sites in addition to comparing the trained period versus the untrained period while trainees were rotating through the MICU.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effectiveness of simulation based mastery learning for CVC insertion on mechanical complications3 yearsICUs will collect information on actual CVC insertions including complications (need for line adjustment, arterial puncture, pneumothorax). The investigators plan to compare the trained ICU's complication rates with other ICUs at other sites in addition to comparing the trained period versus the untrained period while trainees were rotating through the MICU.
The effectiveness simulation based mastery learning for CVC insertion at the learner level using simulated checklist data and trainee surveys2 yearsUsing simulated checklist data and trainee surveys, the investigators will assess the effectiveness of our intervention at the learner level.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026