Skip to content

Supported Employment in Patient Aligned Care Teams

Efficacy of Supported Employment Within the OIF/OEF Patient Aligned Care Team

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02400736
Enrollment
119
Registered
2015-03-27
Start date
2015-08-03
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2022-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Mental Disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Substance Use Disorders

Keywords

Veterans, Patient Aligned Care Team, Primary Care, Mental Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress disorder, Major Depression, Individual Placement and Support, Supported Employment, Vocational Rehabilitation, Transitional Work, Anxiety Disorders

Brief summary

In response to the Rehabilitation Research and Development (RR&D) Deployment Health Research, this study addresses the delivery of an evidenced-based vocational rehabilitation, specifically Individual Placement and Support (IPS), for Veterans who are facing unemployment and mental illness as they try to recovery and re-establish civilian life. This study provides the requisite evidence needed to guide the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as to whether to expand the target population for IPS to Veterans with any mental disorder, delivered directly within the primary care setting (i.e. Patient Aligned Care Team; PACT). Such modifications in VHA practice could substantially improve Veteran vocational rehabilitation access and outcomes, moving a significantly greater number of disabled Veterans back to full and productive lives in the community.

Detailed description

Background: Veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan wars often confront unemployment as they reintegrate into civilian life. Over the past two decades, studies of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) supported employment have yielded remarkably robust and consistent vocational rehabilitation outcomes. However, IPS has predominantly only been studied in mental health settings and in the seriously mentally ill populations. Access to a mental health setting for recently deployed Veterans is often delayed by months or years, and thus, result in substantial delay of referrals to vocational rehabilitation programs which leave many Veterans vulnerable to continued unemployment and a deteriorating trajectory. Methods: This single site, prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated the efficacy of IPS when delivered within primary care Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT). Participants were U.S. military Veterans who served in the Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) and/or any other Southwest Asia operations (i.e. since 1990) who were receiving care in a primary care PACT, currently unemployed and diagnosed with any mental disorder other than a serious mental illness. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to either IPS or VHA treatment as usual vocational rehabilitation (TAU-VR) which included prevocational counseling, community based supported employment, or most commonly Transitional Work assignment. Compared to TAU-VR (control condition), IPS delivered within a PACT was hypothesized to result in a higher rate of steady workers, as defined by working \>/=50% of the weeks in the 12-month follow-up period in a competitive job (primary outcome), more weeks worked in a competitive job, and more income earned. Significance: In an innovative approach, this study breaks from the diagnostic categorical approach and the mental health treatment setting and evaluates the efficacy of IPS when delivered in a primary care setting, specifically a PACT that serves Veterans who have returned from the Iraq, Afghanistan, and other Southwest Asia conflicts. Making a substantial paradigm shift, this study integrates IPS within a PACT for the first time ever. The research is directly linked to the RR&D priority areas of improving vocational outcomes and promoting recovery in Veterans.

Interventions

Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is the evidenced based model of supported employment.

OTHERTreatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TUA-VR)

Vocational Rehabilitation Treatment as Usual includes pre-vocational counseling, Community Based Supported Employment, or most commonly Transitional Work assignments (TW).

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 19\* (\<19 years of age is the state of Alabama defined minor) * Receiving primary care treatment in the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center (TVAMC) PACT, called the Transition Center (i.e. served during the OEF/OIF/OND/other Southwest Asia conflicts) or other Primary Care PACT providing care for OEF/OIF/OND/other Southwest Asia Veteran * Otherwise eligible for TVAMC vocational rehabilitation services, in the event that the Veteran is randomized to TW * diagnosis that is disabling or potentially disabling (i.e. depressive, bipolar II, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, trauma- and stressor-related, dissociative, impulse- control, and substance related/addictive (other than caffeine and nicotine) disorder classifications), other than those listed as exclusionary, within past 90 days according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th edition. * Currently unemployed, defined as not working in a competitive job for a wage or under-employed, defined as (defined as: working less than 20 hours per week in a job that is low wage and is not in keeping with the Veteran's ability, aptitude, or skills) * Expression of interest in competitive employment * Willing and able to give informed consent. Note: Veterans with history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Current diagnosis of (i) schizophrenia, (ii) schizoaffective, (iii) bipolar I disorder, or major depression with psychotic features, since these Veterans may receive IPS in mental health * Diagnosis of dementia (evidenced in the medical record) * Clinically significant unstable or severe medical condition, or terminal illness, that would contraindicate study participation or expose them to an undue risk of a significant adverse event * Unlikely that participant can complete the study, e.g. expected deployment, incarceration, long-term hospitalization, or relocation from the vicinity of the TVAMC during the study period * Active suicidal or homicidal ideation making it unsafe for Veteran to be included in study * Current participation in another interventional trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Steady Worker12 monthsParticipants were categorized as a steady worker if they held a competitive job for 50% or more of the 12-month follow-up (i.e. 26 or more weeks out of 52 weeks).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job12 monthsNumber of weeks out of 52 week follow-up in which the participant worked at least one hour in a competitive job.
Time to First Competitive Job12 monthsThe number of weeks from randomization until the participant worked in a competitive job.
Income Earned From Competitive Jobs12 monthsFor those participants, the income earned from any competitive jobs was added for the 52-week follow-up period.
Income Earned From All Sources12 monthsAll income earned from competitive, transitional work, and other sources over the 12-month follow-up.
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months.Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, 12) were included in mixed model.Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is a 10-item self-report Likert-type questionnaire that asks participants to indicate the degree of their agreement or disagreement with statements about their self-esteem and self-depreciation from 0 = strongly agree to 3 = strongly disagree. The items are summed and the scoring ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of self-esteem; a positive change in score over time indicates improved self esteem. A score less than 15 may indicate low self esteem.
Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job12 monthsIncome earned ($) from competitive jobs over 12 months was compared between groups for all randomized participants who held a competitive job at some point.
Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12.Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, and 12) included in analysis.Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): 90-item self-report survey; assesses nine dimensions. Each item is self-rated for level of discomfort/distress on scale of 0 not at all to 4 extremely for somatization (range 0 to 48), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (range 0 to 40), interpersonal sensitivity (range 0 to 36), depression (range 0 to 52), anxiety (range 0 to 40), hostility (range 0 to 24), phobic-anxiety (range 0 to 28), paranoid ideation (range 0 to 24), and psychoticism (range 0 to 40). Total score for a dimension is the sum of items and the distress score for each dimension is the sum divided by number of items in that dimension (range = 0 to 4). Global Severity Index is a mean of all items, calculated by dividing the sum of scores by the number of items (range 0 to 4). Higher score indicates greater distress and increase in score over time indicates worse outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Community Reintegration of Service Members12 monthsCommunity Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) is a self-report instrument used to evaluate the Veteran's reintegration into the community. The correlations between the CRIS and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scales of role physical, role emotional, and social functioning were 0.44-0.80 and the CRIS has strong reliability, conceptual integrity, and construct validity. In pilot studies with 126 veterans, working subjects had better CRIS scores then unemployed subjects. Items on the CRIS cover 9 aspects of participation: Learning and Applying Knowledge, General Tasks and Demands, Communication, Mobility, Self-care, Domestic Life, Interpersonal Relationships, Major Life Areas, and Community, Social and Civic Life. Subscale scores for 1) extent of participation, 2) perceived limitations, and 3) satisfaction with participation are calculated. For each of the 3 subscales, the minimum score is 10, the maximum score is 70. Higher scores are indication of better outcomes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

502 veterans were considered for this study, 140 were consented, 19 were not eligible, 2 were randomized in error, and 119 were randomized and included in the analyses. Of the 119 randomized participants, 100 (84%) participants completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is supported employment and involves the following domains: 1) competitive Employment: IPS assists participants to enter into competitive jobs; 2) eligibility based on client choice, i.e. zero exclusion; 3) integration of IPS and treatment team, i.e. the PACT; 4) patient-centered job match for competitive employment; 5) personalized benefits counseling: IPS specialists help Veterans obtain information about their VA, Social Security, Medicaid, and other government entitlements; 6) rapid job search: IPS specialists use a rapid job search, rather than providing lengthy pre-employment assessment, training, counseling; 7) job development: IPS specialists build an employer network based on Veterans' interests; 8) time-unlimited and individualized support: follow-along IPS supports are individualized and continue for as long as needed during the 12-month study.
58
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation could include pre-vocational counseling, Community Based Supported Employment, and most commonly Transitional Work assignments (TW) which involves 1) time-limited set-aside work experiences: short-term transitional work experiences in a brokered or set-aside work setting; 2) no strict entrance criteria other than general medical clearance; 3) limited integration of TW and clinical Services; 4) not patient-centered: TW jobs are pre-arranged, set-aside jobs are less likely to have a meaningful relationship to the Veterans' preferences; 5) personalized benefits counseling; 6) limited job search: TW specialists provide variable and limited guidance for competitive job search; 7) no job development: TW specialists do not engage in community based job development; 8) time limited: TW specialist does not provide long-term follow-up after the first job is obtained.
61
Total119

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up66
Overall StudyMoved from the area31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIndividual Placement and Support (IPS)Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Total
Age, Continuous
Age
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
57 Participants60 Participants117 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Mental Disorder
Agoraphobia
7 Participants13 Participants20 Participants
Mental Disorder
Alcohol Use Disorder, past year
29 Participants26 Participants55 Participants
Mental Disorder
Major depression, current
43 Participants41 Participants84 Participants
Mental Disorder
Major depression, past
49 Participants48 Participants97 Participants
Mental Disorder
Panic Disorder (lifetime)
24 Participants27 Participants51 Participants
Mental Disorder
Post-traumatic stress disorder
46 Participants44 Participants90 Participants
Mental Disorder
Substance Used Disorder
29 Participants27 Participants56 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
42 Participants45 Participants87 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants16 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 580 / 61
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 5822 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 584 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Steady Worker

Participants were categorized as a steady worker if they held a competitive job for 50% or more of the 12-month follow-up (i.e. 26 or more weeks out of 52 weeks).

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Steady Worker26 Participants
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Steady Worker15 Participants
Comparison: Using SamplePower 3.0 to estimate the statistical power, the target sample size of 120 (60 per group) provided 84% power to detect a 25% or greater absolute difference between groups in the percent of participants achieving 'steady worker' status (e.g., 40% in IPS vs. 15% in control arm), at the .05 level of significance, assuming a 10% attrition.p-value: 0.0295% CI: [1.14, 5.43]Chi-squared
Secondary

Income Earned From All Sources

All income earned from competitive, transitional work, and other sources over the 12-month follow-up.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Income Earned From All Sources17,960 US dollars
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Income Earned From All Sources11,168 US dollars
p-value: 0.004t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Income Earned From Competitive Jobs

For those participants, the income earned from any competitive jobs was added for the 52-week follow-up period.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Income Earned From Competitive Jobs11,106 US dollars
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Income Earned From Competitive Jobs6,605 US dollars
p-value: 0.033t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job

Income earned ($) from competitive jobs over 12 months was compared between groups for all randomized participants who held a competitive job at some point.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All randomized participants who held a competitive job during the 12-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job18,945 US dollars
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job13,813 US dollars
p-value: 0.062t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months.

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is a 10-item self-report Likert-type questionnaire that asks participants to indicate the degree of their agreement or disagreement with statements about their self-esteem and self-depreciation from 0 = strongly agree to 3 = strongly disagree. The items are summed and the scoring ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of self-esteem; a positive change in score over time indicates improved self esteem. A score less than 15 may indicate low self esteem.

Time frame: Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, 12) were included in mixed model.

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months.1.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months.0.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.33
Comparison: The effect of treatment on each of secondary outcome measures were analyzed using a longitudinal mixed-effects regression model. The group by time interaction tested for the treatment effect.p-value: 0.47Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12.

Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): 90-item self-report survey; assesses nine dimensions. Each item is self-rated for level of discomfort/distress on scale of 0 not at all to 4 extremely for somatization (range 0 to 48), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (range 0 to 40), interpersonal sensitivity (range 0 to 36), depression (range 0 to 52), anxiety (range 0 to 40), hostility (range 0 to 24), phobic-anxiety (range 0 to 28), paranoid ideation (range 0 to 24), and psychoticism (range 0 to 40). Total score for a dimension is the sum of items and the distress score for each dimension is the sum divided by number of items in that dimension (range = 0 to 4). Global Severity Index is a mean of all items, calculated by dividing the sum of scores by the number of items (range 0 to 4). Higher score indicates greater distress and increase in score over time indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, and 12) included in analysis.

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12.0.036 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12.0.042 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
p-value: 0.853Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time to First Competitive Job

The number of weeks from randomization until the participant worked in a competitive job.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Time to First Competitive Job8.7 weeksStandard Deviation 8.8
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Time to First Competitive Job17.6 weeksStandard Deviation 14.2
Comparison: intent to treat analysisp-value: 0.005Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job

Number of weeks out of 52 week follow-up in which the participant worked at least one hour in a competitive job.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job38.6 weeksStandard Deviation 14.8
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job24.6 weeksStandard Deviation 17.2
Comparison: Total mean time worked was compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA).p-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Community Reintegration of Service Members

Community Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) is a self-report instrument used to evaluate the Veteran's reintegration into the community. The correlations between the CRIS and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scales of role physical, role emotional, and social functioning were 0.44-0.80 and the CRIS has strong reliability, conceptual integrity, and construct validity. In pilot studies with 126 veterans, working subjects had better CRIS scores then unemployed subjects. Items on the CRIS cover 9 aspects of participation: Learning and Applying Knowledge, General Tasks and Demands, Communication, Mobility, Self-care, Domestic Life, Interpersonal Relationships, Major Life Areas, and Community, Social and Civic Life. Subscale scores for 1) extent of participation, 2) perceived limitations, and 3) satisfaction with participation are calculated. For each of the 3 subscales, the minimum score is 10, the maximum score is 70. Higher scores are indication of better outcomes.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All subjects randomized; intent-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members12-month (Satisfaction with Participation)47.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.11
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service MembersBaseline (Satisfaction with Participation)48.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.89
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members8-month (Satisfaction with Participation)50.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.11
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service MembersBaseline (Extent of Participation)46.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.15
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members4-month (Extent of Participation)48.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.32
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members8-month (Extent of Participation)48.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.51
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members12-month (Extent of Participation)46.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service MembersBaseline (Perceived Limitations)47.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.77
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members4-month (Perceived Limitations)49.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.96
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members8-month (Perceived Limitations)47.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.97
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members12-month (Perceived Limitations)46.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Community Reintegration of Service Members4-Month (Satisfaction with Participation)52.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.62
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service MembersBaseline (Satisfaction with Participation)50.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.91
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service MembersBaseline (Perceived Limitations)48.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.34
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members4-month (Perceived Limitations)48.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.81
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members12-month (Satisfaction with Participation)50.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.45
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members4-Month (Satisfaction with Participation)51.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.34
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service MembersBaseline (Extent of Participation)48.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.75
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members8-month (Perceived Limitations)47.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.01
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members4-month (Extent of Participation)48.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.98
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members8-month (Satisfaction with Participation)50.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.92
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members8-month (Extent of Participation)46.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.55
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members12-month (Perceived Limitations)48.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Community Reintegration of Service Members12-month (Extent of Participation)47.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
p-value: >0.3ANOVA
Post Hoc

Held a Full-time Competitive Job

Participant held a full-time competitive job during the 12-month follow-up. Full time was defined as working at least 30 hours per week.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Held a Full-time Competitive Job25 Participants
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Held a Full-time Competitive Job12 Participants
p-value: 0.006Chi-squared
Post Hoc

Proportion of Weeks Unencumbered by Transitional Work in Which Competitive Job Was Held

The number of weeks in which the participant was engaged in a transitional work assignment in the treatment as usual arm was subtracted from the 52 week follow-up and used as denominator in deriving the proportion of weeks worked in a competitive job. The IPS group did not engage in transitional work, so 52 weeks was the denominator in deriving the proportion of weeks worked in a competitive job.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)Proportion of Weeks Unencumbered by Transitional Work in Which Competitive Job Was Held40 percentage of 52 weeksStandard Deviation 13.7
Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR)Proportion of Weeks Unencumbered by Transitional Work in Which Competitive Job Was Held25 percentage of 52 weeksStandard Deviation 16.7
p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026