Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Mental Disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Substance Use Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Veterans, Patient Aligned Care Team, Primary Care, Mental Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress disorder, Major Depression, Individual Placement and Support, Supported Employment, Vocational Rehabilitation, Transitional Work, Anxiety Disorders
Brief summary
In response to the Rehabilitation Research and Development (RR&D) Deployment Health Research, this study addresses the delivery of an evidenced-based vocational rehabilitation, specifically Individual Placement and Support (IPS), for Veterans who are facing unemployment and mental illness as they try to recovery and re-establish civilian life. This study provides the requisite evidence needed to guide the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as to whether to expand the target population for IPS to Veterans with any mental disorder, delivered directly within the primary care setting (i.e. Patient Aligned Care Team; PACT). Such modifications in VHA practice could substantially improve Veteran vocational rehabilitation access and outcomes, moving a significantly greater number of disabled Veterans back to full and productive lives in the community.
Detailed description
Background: Veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan wars often confront unemployment as they reintegrate into civilian life. Over the past two decades, studies of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) supported employment have yielded remarkably robust and consistent vocational rehabilitation outcomes. However, IPS has predominantly only been studied in mental health settings and in the seriously mentally ill populations. Access to a mental health setting for recently deployed Veterans is often delayed by months or years, and thus, result in substantial delay of referrals to vocational rehabilitation programs which leave many Veterans vulnerable to continued unemployment and a deteriorating trajectory. Methods: This single site, prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated the efficacy of IPS when delivered within primary care Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT). Participants were U.S. military Veterans who served in the Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) and/or any other Southwest Asia operations (i.e. since 1990) who were receiving care in a primary care PACT, currently unemployed and diagnosed with any mental disorder other than a serious mental illness. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to either IPS or VHA treatment as usual vocational rehabilitation (TAU-VR) which included prevocational counseling, community based supported employment, or most commonly Transitional Work assignment. Compared to TAU-VR (control condition), IPS delivered within a PACT was hypothesized to result in a higher rate of steady workers, as defined by working \>/=50% of the weeks in the 12-month follow-up period in a competitive job (primary outcome), more weeks worked in a competitive job, and more income earned. Significance: In an innovative approach, this study breaks from the diagnostic categorical approach and the mental health treatment setting and evaluates the efficacy of IPS when delivered in a primary care setting, specifically a PACT that serves Veterans who have returned from the Iraq, Afghanistan, and other Southwest Asia conflicts. Making a substantial paradigm shift, this study integrates IPS within a PACT for the first time ever. The research is directly linked to the RR&D priority areas of improving vocational outcomes and promoting recovery in Veterans.
Interventions
Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is the evidenced based model of supported employment.
Vocational Rehabilitation Treatment as Usual includes pre-vocational counseling, Community Based Supported Employment, or most commonly Transitional Work assignments (TW).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 19\* (\<19 years of age is the state of Alabama defined minor) * Receiving primary care treatment in the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center (TVAMC) PACT, called the Transition Center (i.e. served during the OEF/OIF/OND/other Southwest Asia conflicts) or other Primary Care PACT providing care for OEF/OIF/OND/other Southwest Asia Veteran * Otherwise eligible for TVAMC vocational rehabilitation services, in the event that the Veteran is randomized to TW * diagnosis that is disabling or potentially disabling (i.e. depressive, bipolar II, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, trauma- and stressor-related, dissociative, impulse- control, and substance related/addictive (other than caffeine and nicotine) disorder classifications), other than those listed as exclusionary, within past 90 days according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th edition. * Currently unemployed, defined as not working in a competitive job for a wage or under-employed, defined as (defined as: working less than 20 hours per week in a job that is low wage and is not in keeping with the Veteran's ability, aptitude, or skills) * Expression of interest in competitive employment * Willing and able to give informed consent. Note: Veterans with history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Current diagnosis of (i) schizophrenia, (ii) schizoaffective, (iii) bipolar I disorder, or major depression with psychotic features, since these Veterans may receive IPS in mental health * Diagnosis of dementia (evidenced in the medical record) * Clinically significant unstable or severe medical condition, or terminal illness, that would contraindicate study participation or expose them to an undue risk of a significant adverse event * Unlikely that participant can complete the study, e.g. expected deployment, incarceration, long-term hospitalization, or relocation from the vicinity of the TVAMC during the study period * Active suicidal or homicidal ideation making it unsafe for Veteran to be included in study * Current participation in another interventional trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Steady Worker | 12 months | Participants were categorized as a steady worker if they held a competitive job for 50% or more of the 12-month follow-up (i.e. 26 or more weeks out of 52 weeks). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job | 12 months | Number of weeks out of 52 week follow-up in which the participant worked at least one hour in a competitive job. |
| Time to First Competitive Job | 12 months | The number of weeks from randomization until the participant worked in a competitive job. |
| Income Earned From Competitive Jobs | 12 months | For those participants, the income earned from any competitive jobs was added for the 52-week follow-up period. |
| Income Earned From All Sources | 12 months | All income earned from competitive, transitional work, and other sources over the 12-month follow-up. |
| Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months. | Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, 12) were included in mixed model. | Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is a 10-item self-report Likert-type questionnaire that asks participants to indicate the degree of their agreement or disagreement with statements about their self-esteem and self-depreciation from 0 = strongly agree to 3 = strongly disagree. The items are summed and the scoring ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of self-esteem; a positive change in score over time indicates improved self esteem. A score less than 15 may indicate low self esteem. |
| Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job | 12 months | Income earned ($) from competitive jobs over 12 months was compared between groups for all randomized participants who held a competitive job at some point. |
| Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12. | Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, and 12) included in analysis. | Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): 90-item self-report survey; assesses nine dimensions. Each item is self-rated for level of discomfort/distress on scale of 0 not at all to 4 extremely for somatization (range 0 to 48), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (range 0 to 40), interpersonal sensitivity (range 0 to 36), depression (range 0 to 52), anxiety (range 0 to 40), hostility (range 0 to 24), phobic-anxiety (range 0 to 28), paranoid ideation (range 0 to 24), and psychoticism (range 0 to 40). Total score for a dimension is the sum of items and the distress score for each dimension is the sum divided by number of items in that dimension (range = 0 to 4). Global Severity Index is a mean of all items, calculated by dividing the sum of scores by the number of items (range 0 to 4). Higher score indicates greater distress and increase in score over time indicates worse outcome. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Community Reintegration of Service Members | 12 months | Community Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) is a self-report instrument used to evaluate the Veteran's reintegration into the community. The correlations between the CRIS and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scales of role physical, role emotional, and social functioning were 0.44-0.80 and the CRIS has strong reliability, conceptual integrity, and construct validity. In pilot studies with 126 veterans, working subjects had better CRIS scores then unemployed subjects. Items on the CRIS cover 9 aspects of participation: Learning and Applying Knowledge, General Tasks and Demands, Communication, Mobility, Self-care, Domestic Life, Interpersonal Relationships, Major Life Areas, and Community, Social and Civic Life. Subscale scores for 1) extent of participation, 2) perceived limitations, and 3) satisfaction with participation are calculated. For each of the 3 subscales, the minimum score is 10, the maximum score is 70. Higher scores are indication of better outcomes. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
502 veterans were considered for this study, 140 were consented, 19 were not eligible, 2 were randomized in error, and 119 were randomized and included in the analyses. Of the 119 randomized participants, 100 (84%) participants completed the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is supported employment and involves the following domains: 1) competitive Employment: IPS assists participants to enter into competitive jobs; 2) eligibility based on client choice, i.e. zero exclusion; 3) integration of IPS and treatment team, i.e. the PACT; 4) patient-centered job match for competitive employment; 5) personalized benefits counseling: IPS specialists help Veterans obtain information about their VA, Social Security, Medicaid, and other government entitlements; 6) rapid job search: IPS specialists use a rapid job search, rather than providing lengthy pre-employment assessment, training, counseling; 7) job development: IPS specialists build an employer network based on Veterans' interests; 8) time-unlimited and individualized support: follow-along IPS supports are individualized and continue for as long as needed during the 12-month study. | 58 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation could include pre-vocational counseling, Community Based Supported Employment, and most commonly Transitional Work assignments (TW) which involves 1) time-limited set-aside work experiences: short-term transitional work experiences in a brokered or set-aside work setting; 2) no strict entrance criteria other than general medical clearance; 3) limited integration of TW and clinical Services; 4) not patient-centered: TW jobs are pre-arranged, set-aside jobs are less likely to have a meaningful relationship to the Veterans' preferences; 5) personalized benefits counseling; 6) limited job search: TW specialists provide variable and limited guidance for competitive job search; 7) no job development: TW specialists do not engage in community based job development; 8) time limited: TW specialist does not provide long-term follow-up after the first job is obtained. | 61 |
| Total | 119 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Moved from the area | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous Age | 37.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 38.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 38.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 57 Participants | 60 Participants | 117 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Mental Disorder Agoraphobia | 7 Participants | 13 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Mental Disorder Alcohol Use Disorder, past year | 29 Participants | 26 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Mental Disorder Major depression, current | 43 Participants | 41 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Mental Disorder Major depression, past | 49 Participants | 48 Participants | 97 Participants |
| Mental Disorder Panic Disorder (lifetime) | 24 Participants | 27 Participants | 51 Participants |
| Mental Disorder Post-traumatic stress disorder | 46 Participants | 44 Participants | 90 Participants |
| Mental Disorder Substance Used Disorder | 29 Participants | 27 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 42 Participants | 45 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 15 Participants | 16 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants | 12 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 49 Participants | 49 Participants | 98 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 58 | 0 / 61 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 17 / 58 | 22 / 61 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 58 | 4 / 61 |
Outcome results
Steady Worker
Participants were categorized as a steady worker if they held a competitive job for 50% or more of the 12-month follow-up (i.e. 26 or more weeks out of 52 weeks).
Time frame: 12 months
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Steady Worker | 26 Participants |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Steady Worker | 15 Participants |
Income Earned From All Sources
All income earned from competitive, transitional work, and other sources over the 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Income Earned From All Sources | 17,960 US dollars |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Income Earned From All Sources | 11,168 US dollars |
Income Earned From Competitive Jobs
For those participants, the income earned from any competitive jobs was added for the 52-week follow-up period.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Income Earned From Competitive Jobs | 11,106 US dollars |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Income Earned From Competitive Jobs | 6,605 US dollars |
Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job
Income earned ($) from competitive jobs over 12 months was compared between groups for all randomized participants who held a competitive job at some point.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: All randomized participants who held a competitive job during the 12-month follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job | 18,945 US dollars |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Income Earned From Competitive Jobs in Participants Who Held a Competitive Job | 13,813 US dollars |
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months.
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is a 10-item self-report Likert-type questionnaire that asks participants to indicate the degree of their agreement or disagreement with statements about their self-esteem and self-depreciation from 0 = strongly agree to 3 = strongly disagree. The items are summed and the scoring ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of self-esteem; a positive change in score over time indicates improved self esteem. A score less than 15 may indicate low self esteem.
Time frame: Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, 12) were included in mixed model.
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months. | 1.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.16 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Change From Baseline to 12 Months. | 0.31 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.33 |
Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12.
Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): 90-item self-report survey; assesses nine dimensions. Each item is self-rated for level of discomfort/distress on scale of 0 not at all to 4 extremely for somatization (range 0 to 48), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (range 0 to 40), interpersonal sensitivity (range 0 to 36), depression (range 0 to 52), anxiety (range 0 to 40), hostility (range 0 to 24), phobic-anxiety (range 0 to 28), paranoid ideation (range 0 to 24), and psychoticism (range 0 to 40). Total score for a dimension is the sum of items and the distress score for each dimension is the sum divided by number of items in that dimension (range = 0 to 4). Global Severity Index is a mean of all items, calculated by dividing the sum of scores by the number of items (range 0 to 4). Higher score indicates greater distress and increase in score over time indicates worse outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline to month 12 (value at 12 months minus value at baseline) is shown below. Additionally, all relevant time points used in the calculation timeframe from baseline to 12 months (baseline, months 4, 6, 8, and 12) included in analysis.
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12. | 0.036 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Change From Baseline to Month 12. | 0.042 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
Time to First Competitive Job
The number of weeks from randomization until the participant worked in a competitive job.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Time to First Competitive Job | 8.7 weeks | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Time to First Competitive Job | 17.6 weeks | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job
Number of weeks out of 52 week follow-up in which the participant worked at least one hour in a competitive job.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job | 38.6 weeks | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Weeks Worked in a Competitive Job | 24.6 weeks | Standard Deviation 17.2 |
Community Reintegration of Service Members
Community Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) is a self-report instrument used to evaluate the Veteran's reintegration into the community. The correlations between the CRIS and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scales of role physical, role emotional, and social functioning were 0.44-0.80 and the CRIS has strong reliability, conceptual integrity, and construct validity. In pilot studies with 126 veterans, working subjects had better CRIS scores then unemployed subjects. Items on the CRIS cover 9 aspects of participation: Learning and Applying Knowledge, General Tasks and Demands, Communication, Mobility, Self-care, Domestic Life, Interpersonal Relationships, Major Life Areas, and Community, Social and Civic Life. Subscale scores for 1) extent of participation, 2) perceived limitations, and 3) satisfaction with participation are calculated. For each of the 3 subscales, the minimum score is 10, the maximum score is 70. Higher scores are indication of better outcomes.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: All subjects randomized; intent-to-treat analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 12-month (Satisfaction with Participation) | 47.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.11 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | Baseline (Satisfaction with Participation) | 48.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.89 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 8-month (Satisfaction with Participation) | 50.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.11 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | Baseline (Extent of Participation) | 46.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.15 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 4-month (Extent of Participation) | 48.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.32 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 8-month (Extent of Participation) | 48.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.51 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 12-month (Extent of Participation) | 46.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.61 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | Baseline (Perceived Limitations) | 47.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.77 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 4-month (Perceived Limitations) | 49.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.96 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 8-month (Perceived Limitations) | 47.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.97 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 12-month (Perceived Limitations) | 46.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.21 |
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 4-Month (Satisfaction with Participation) | 52.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.62 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | Baseline (Satisfaction with Participation) | 50.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.91 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | Baseline (Perceived Limitations) | 48.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.34 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 4-month (Perceived Limitations) | 48.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.81 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 12-month (Satisfaction with Participation) | 50.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.45 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 4-Month (Satisfaction with Participation) | 51.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.34 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | Baseline (Extent of Participation) | 48.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.75 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 8-month (Perceived Limitations) | 47.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.01 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 4-month (Extent of Participation) | 48.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.98 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 8-month (Satisfaction with Participation) | 50.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.92 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 8-month (Extent of Participation) | 46.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.55 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 12-month (Perceived Limitations) | 48.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.82 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Community Reintegration of Service Members | 12-month (Extent of Participation) | 47.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
Held a Full-time Competitive Job
Participant held a full-time competitive job during the 12-month follow-up. Full time was defined as working at least 30 hours per week.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Held a Full-time Competitive Job | 25 Participants |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Held a Full-time Competitive Job | 12 Participants |
Proportion of Weeks Unencumbered by Transitional Work in Which Competitive Job Was Held
The number of weeks in which the participant was engaged in a transitional work assignment in the treatment as usual arm was subtracted from the 52 week follow-up and used as denominator in deriving the proportion of weeks worked in a competitive job. The IPS group did not engage in transitional work, so 52 weeks was the denominator in deriving the proportion of weeks worked in a competitive job.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: 119 randomized Veterans who were followed in a primary care Patient Aligned Care Team, who had a diagnosis of at least one mental disorder, and were unemployed or under-employed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Placement and Support (IPS) | Proportion of Weeks Unencumbered by Transitional Work in Which Competitive Job Was Held | 40 percentage of 52 weeks | Standard Deviation 13.7 |
| Treatment as Usual Vocational Rehabilitation/Transitional Work (TAU-VR) | Proportion of Weeks Unencumbered by Transitional Work in Which Competitive Job Was Held | 25 percentage of 52 weeks | Standard Deviation 16.7 |