Skip to content

The Trajectory of Physical Activity Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation

The Trajectory of Physical Activity Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02399254
Enrollment
21
Registered
2015-03-26
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2017-06-15
Last updated
2019-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Brief summary

Pulmonary rehabilitation clearly increases exercise capacity, but its effect on physical activity in the home and community settings is less clear. It may take a longer time for this increase in physical activity to occur. It has been stated in an editorial that it takes 3 months to train the muscles but 6 months to train the brain. The Investigators will first evaluate the change in physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation using state-of-the-science motion detectors, then Investigators will follow the trajectory of physical activity over the next several months.

Detailed description

This study will follow physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation longitudinally over 48 weeks. Investigators will use a state-of-the-art accelerometer, to analyze minutes walking per day as the primary outcome, rather than vector magnitude units (VMU) or estimated steps per day. Investigators will explore potential factors influencing this important outcome, including baseline activity levels, demographic variables, changes in exercise capacity, psychological variables, and self-efficacy scores. Finally, Investigators will evaluate the rate of change (trajectory) in physical activity over approximately six months after pulmonary rehabilitation. There are limited data suggesting it takes time for the translation of increased exercise capacity into increased physical activity to occur.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Trinity Health Of New England
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults (≥ 40 years) with a primary clinical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 2. A post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) \< 0.70 from spirometry performed within the preceding 12 months (no specific FEV1 percent-predicted requirement, although we anticipate the FEV1 will average around 45% of predicted, based on previous studies of pulmonary rehabilitation) 3. The patient was referred to pulmonary rehabilitation 4. The patient is clinically-stable: no exacerbation in preceding 4 weeks 5. Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea rating of at least 2 out of 5.

Exclusion criteria

1. Disease severity or co-morbidity that would make the patient be at-risk for participation this study 2. A significant movement disorder, such as hemiplegia, etc. 3. Inability to read and comprehend the questionnaires, which will be in English 4. A history of poor wound healing or chronic skin conditions that might predispose to local problems from wearing the DynaPort. (The DynaPort can be worn outside a thin garment, such as a tee shirt, and is relatively thin, without protruding parts. However, since the device may be worn overnight, and there is a remote risk of pressure problems, this exclusion criterion was added).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minutes/Day at 12 Weeks12 weeks compared to baselineInvestigators will look at changes in directly-measured physical activity (minutes per day of walking activity from the DynaPort) between the 12 ± 3 week assessment and baseline.
Minutes/Day at 48 Weeks48 weeks compared to baselineInvestigators will look at changes in directly-measured physical activity (minutes per day of walking activity from the DynaPort) between the 48 ± 3 week assessment and baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activity-related Energy Expenditure (AEE)(J/Min/kg) at 12 Weeks12 weeks compared to baselineInvestigators will look at changes in activity-related energy expenditure (from the DynaPort) at 12 weeks compared to baseline
Activity-related Energy Expenditure (AEE)(J/Min/kg) at 48 Weeks48 weeks compared to baselineInvestigators will look at changes in activity-related energy expenditure (from the DynaPort) at 48 weeks compared to baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pulmonary Rehabilitation
COPD patients following pulmonary rehabilitation
21
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPulmonary Rehabilitation
Age, Continuous67.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Minutes/Day at 12 Weeks

Investigators will look at changes in directly-measured physical activity (minutes per day of walking activity from the DynaPort) between the 12 ± 3 week assessment and baseline.

Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

Population: Obtaining valid activity data (uploaded to the manufacturer then downloaded to the site) was a problem at all sites despite good support from the manufacturer. As a result a N of 16 could be analyzed at week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pulmonary RehabilitationMinutes/Day at 12 Weeks1.3125000 minutes/dayStandard Error 0.740038
Primary

Minutes/Day at 48 Weeks

Investigators will look at changes in directly-measured physical activity (minutes per day of walking activity from the DynaPort) between the 48 ± 3 week assessment and baseline.

Time frame: 48 weeks compared to baseline

Population: Obtaining valid activity data (uploaded to the manufacturer then downloaded to the site) was a problem at all sites despite good support from the manufacturer. As a result a N of 10 could be analyzed at week 48.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pulmonary RehabilitationMinutes/Day at 48 Weeks0.5000000 minutes/dayStandard Error 1.0979779
Secondary

Activity-related Energy Expenditure (AEE)(J/Min/kg) at 12 Weeks

Investigators will look at changes in activity-related energy expenditure (from the DynaPort) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

Population: Obtaining valid activity data (uploaded to the manufacturer then downloaded to the site) was a problem at all sites despite good support from the manufacturer. As a result a N of 16 could be analyzed at week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pulmonary RehabilitationActivity-related Energy Expenditure (AEE)(J/Min/kg) at 12 Weeks4.9375000 AEE (J/min/kg)Standard Error 1.9737206
Secondary

Activity-related Energy Expenditure (AEE)(J/Min/kg) at 48 Weeks

Investigators will look at changes in activity-related energy expenditure (from the DynaPort) at 48 weeks compared to baseline

Time frame: 48 weeks compared to baseline

Population: Obtaining valid activity data (uploaded to the manufacturer then downloaded to the site) was a problem at all sites despite good support from the manufacturer. As a result a N of 10 could be analyzed at week 48.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pulmonary RehabilitationActivity-related Energy Expenditure (AEE)(J/Min/kg) at 48 Weeks2.9000000 AEE (J/min/kg)Standard Error 1.9405039

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026