Skip to content

Evaluation of Oral Hygiene Products in an In Situ Caries Model

Clinical Evaluation of Oral Hygiene Products in an In Situ Caries Model

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02399163
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-03-26
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Brief summary

The study will evaluate and compare the potential anti-caries efficacy of a test regimen: placebo (fluoride free) toothpaste (twice daily use) plus fluoride mouthwash (once daily use), in comparison with brushing with a placebo toothpaste alone (twice daily use), to remineralize previously demineralized enamel specimens, as measured by Surface MicroHardness Recovery (%SMHR). This will be a single center, randomized, laboratory analyst blinded, placebo, four treatment, cross-over study in healthy participants. Participants will be assessed at baseline and at the beginning and end of each treatment visit to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.

Interventions

Brushing with fluoride free toothpaste

DRUGFluoride toothpaste

Brushing with fluoride containing toothpaste

Fluoride mouth wash to be followed after brushing with fluoride free toothpaste in Placebo dentifrice/Fluoride rinse arm and in Fluoride dentifrice/Fluoride rinse arm

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged between 18 and 85 years inclusive 2. Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions 3. Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee: * No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination. * Absence of any condition that could affect the participant's safety or well-being or their ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements 4. Currently living in the Indianapolis, Indiana area and has not had a professional fluoride treatment within 14 days of the first treatment visit 5. Currently wearing a removable mandibular partial denture with sufficient room in one posterior buccal flange areas to accommodate two enamel specimens 6. Willing to have their denture modified to accommodate enamel test specimens and willing and capable of wearing their removable mandibular partial dentures 24 hours per day during the experimental periods 7. Have a salivary flow rate in the range of normal values (un-stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.2 milliliter (mL)/minute; gum base stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.8 mL/minute).

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or breast feeding women 2. Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients 3. Currently taking antibiotics or have taken antibiotics in the two weeks prior to the screening visit. 4. Taking or have taken a bisphosphonate drug for treatment of osteoporosis. 5. Participation in another GSKCH investigational dental product study within seven days of first study treatment. 6. Previous participation in this study. 7. Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse Compared to Placebo Dentifrice/No RinseBaseline to 14 daysSMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents re-hardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer \[μm\]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): \[D1-R/D1-B\]\*100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride RinseBaseline to 14 daysSMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer \[μm\]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): \[D1-R/D1-B\]\*100.
Enamel Fluoride UptakeBaseline to 14 daysThe microdrill enamel biopsy technique was used to analyze the fluoride uptake by enamel. Each enamel specimen was mounted on the long axis of a drill attached to a microdrill and drilled to a depth of approximately 100 micrometer (μm) through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen). The enamel powder pooled from four drilling samples was then immediately analyzed for fluoride content using fluoride specific electrode and pH/ion meter. The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as microgram per square centimeter (μg/cm\^2).
Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 14Baseline to Day14Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 baseline prior to supervised treatment. - at day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample.
Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 14Baseline up to Day 14Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited at one center in United States of America.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 80 participants were screened. Of the 80 participants, 62 were randomized and 53 completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Participants
All randomized participants were evaluated for baseline characteristics
62
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Participant5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Participants
Age, Continuous64.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.45
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 6013 / 5618 / 5917 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 601 / 560 / 591 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse Compared to Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse

SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents re-hardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer \[μm\]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): \[D1-R/D1-B\]\*100.

Time frame: Baseline to 14 days

Population: Per-protocol (PP) population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride RinsePercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse Compared to Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse24.48 % SMHRStandard Deviation 16.088
Placebo Dentifrice/No RinsePercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse Compared to Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse8.09 % SMHRStandard Deviation 25.892
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [11.061, 22.454]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 14

Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 14

Population: PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 1413.08 μg/mLStandard Deviation 9.743
Placebo Dentifrice/No RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 140.05 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.045
Fluoride Dentifrice/No RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 148.62 μg/mLStandard Deviation 6.892
Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 1413.81 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.62
Secondary

Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 14

Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 baseline prior to supervised treatment. - at day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample.

Time frame: Baseline to Day14

Population: PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 140.06 microgram per mililitre(μg/mL )Standard Deviation 0.317
Placebo Dentifrice/No RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 14-0.01 microgram per mililitre(μg/mL )Standard Deviation 0.03
Fluoride Dentifrice/No RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 140.00 microgram per mililitre(μg/mL )Standard Deviation 0.245
Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride RinseChange in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 140.06 microgram per mililitre(μg/mL )Standard Deviation 0.203
Secondary

Enamel Fluoride Uptake

The microdrill enamel biopsy technique was used to analyze the fluoride uptake by enamel. Each enamel specimen was mounted on the long axis of a drill attached to a microdrill and drilled to a depth of approximately 100 micrometer (μm) through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen). The enamel powder pooled from four drilling samples was then immediately analyzed for fluoride content using fluoride specific electrode and pH/ion meter. The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as microgram per square centimeter (μg/cm\^2).

Time frame: Baseline to 14 days

Population: PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride RinseEnamel Fluoride Uptake7.22 microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)Standard Deviation 3.016
Placebo Dentifrice/No RinseEnamel Fluoride Uptake1.60 microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)Standard Deviation 0.67
Fluoride Dentifrice/No RinseEnamel Fluoride Uptake8.01 microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)Standard Deviation 3.925
Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride RinseEnamel Fluoride Uptake9.97 microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)Standard Deviation 4.962
Secondary

Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse

SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer \[μm\]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): \[D1-R/D1-B\]\*100.

Time frame: Baseline to 14 days

Population: PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride RinsePercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse24.48 % SMHRStandard Deviation 16.088
Placebo Dentifrice/No RinsePercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse8.09 % SMHRStandard Deviation 25.892
Fluoride Dentifrice/No RinsePercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse28.36 % SMHRStandard Deviation 21.037
Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride RinsePercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse30.01 % SMHRStandard Deviation 18.203

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026