Skip to content

Transvaginal NOTES Nephrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Nephrectomy

Transvaginal NOTES Nephrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02398110
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-03-25
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2015-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Disease

Brief summary

Recent reports have suggested that transvaginal NOTES nephrectomy is feasible, yet comparative studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of transvaginal NOTES nephrectomy to conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREtransvaginal NOTES nephrectomy

A 5- and 10-mm trocar were placed at the right and left medial margin of umbilicus. A lengthened 10-mm trocar was placed through the vagina into the abdominal cavity

PROCEDUREconventional laparoscopic nephrectomy

One 10-mm trocar was inserted at the midclavicular line 2 cm below the umbilicus, another 10-mm periumbilical trocar was placed for the camera, and a 5- or 10-mm trocar was placed 3 cm below the costal margin

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* female sex, * indication for nephrectomy due to benign or malignant kidney disease, * age between 18 and 65 years, and * legal competence

Exclusion criteria

* emergency surgery, * contraindications to laparoscopic surgery, * class IV or V as defined by the American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA), * body mass index (BMI) of \> 30 kg/m2, * advanced TNM staging (≥ T3), * history of major abdominal surgery, * gravidity or breast-feeding, and * no written informed consent signed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensity of pain in motion (Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)at postoperative day 1Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index)Preoperatively, and 4, 8 and 12 months postoperativelySexual function was evaluated according to the Female Sexual Function Index
Intraoperative complications (e.g. bleeding, organ-injury)Evaluated at the operation daye.g. bleeding, organ-injury
Cosmetic assessment (Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire)> 3 months after surgeryThe cosmetic result was assessed using a Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire and Scoring System (PSAQ)
Quality of life (SF-36)on postoperative month 1measured with the
Postoperative complication (classified using the Clavien-Dindo system)early (≤ 1 month), or late (>1 month)Early (≤ 1 month) and late (\> 1 month) complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system
Duration of the operationat the operation dayin minutes

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiaofeng Zou, MD
gyfyurology@126.com+86-797-8269588

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026