Skip to content

Conventional Vaccine and Intradermal Vaccine Among HIV-infected Young Subjects

Safety and Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccine Among HIV-infected Young Subjects: Conventional Vaccine Versus Intradermal Vaccine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02398097
Enrollment
88
Registered
2015-03-25
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2015-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Influenza

Brief summary

Several studies have shown poor immune response to conventional influenza vaccines in HIV-infected individuals. This study was conducted expecting the more potent immunogenicity of intradermal vaccine compared with conventional intramuscular vaccine in HIV-infected adults.

Detailed description

During the 2011/2012 pre-influenza season, three vaccines were used in HIV-infected adults (18 to 60 years): inactivated intramuscular vaccine (Agripal), reduced-content intradermal vaccine (IDflu9μg) and standard-content intradermal vaccine (IDflu15μg). Serum hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibodies and INF-γ ELISpot assay were measured at the time of vaccination and 1 month after vaccination. Adverse events were recorded for 7 days.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAgripal

2011/2012 influenza season standard dose trivalent subunit inactivated intramuscular vaccine, single dose

BIOLOGICALIDflu9μg

2011/2012 influenza season reduced-content intradermal split vaccine, single dose

BIOLOGICALIDflu15μg

2011/2012 influenza season standard-content intradermal split vaccine, single dose

Sponsors

Korea University Guro Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-infected individuals who were not immunized with 2011/2012 influenza vaccine

Exclusion criteria

* known allergy to egg * presentation of any febrile illness ≥37.5°C on the day of vaccination * any history of hypersensitivity reaction to previous influenza vaccination * any other vaccinations within the past one month * use of immunosuppressive agent * recipient of blood product or immunoglobulins during the previous three months * any other conditions that might interfere with the study results

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion of participants with a post-vaccination titer ≥1:40 in subjects with a pre-vaccination titer of <1:10 or a ≥4-fold titer increase in subjects with a pre-vaccination titer of ≥1:10Outcome measure was assessed at two points (baseline and 4 weeks after vaccination)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of subjects with a post-vaccination titer ≥1:40Outcome measure was assessed 4 weeks after vaccination
GMT ratio of the post-vaccination titer to pre-vaccination titerOutcome measure was assessed at two points (baseline and 4 weeks after vaccination)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency and duration of local and systemic adverse eventsAdverse events were recorded for 7 days.The diary was made based on the Food and Drug Association (FDA) Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026