Skip to content

A Study Of Galcanezumab In Participants With Episodic Cluster Headache

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY2951742 in Patients With Episodic Cluster Headache

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02397473
Enrollment
109
Registered
2015-03-25
Start date
2015-05-22
Completion date
2018-06-04
Last updated
2019-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Episodic Cluster Headache

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the study drug known as Galcanezumab in participants with episodic cluster headaches.

Interventions

DRUGGalcanezumab

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of cluster headache as defined by International Headache Society (IHS) International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 beta guidelines with a history of episodic cluster headache with at least two cluster periods lasting from 7 days to 1 year (when untreated) and separated by pain-free remission periods of \>=1 month. * Participants are able to distinguish cluster headache attacks from other headaches.

Exclusion criteria

* Current enrollment in or discontinuation within the last 30 days from, a clinical trial involving any investigational drug or device. * Current use or any prior exposure to any calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibody, any antibody to the CGRP receptor, or antibody to nerve growth factor (NGF). * Are taking indomethacin and/or are suspected of having another distinct trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia. * A history of migraine variants that could implicate or could be confused with ischemia. * Known hypersensitivity to multiple drugs, monoclonal antibodies or other therapeutic proteins. * A history or presence of other medical illness that indicates a medical problem that would preclude study participation. * Evidence of significant active or unstable psychiatric disease, in the opinion of the investigator. * Women who are pregnant or nursing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 1 through Week 3Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 3 from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 1 through Week 8Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 8 from MMRM analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects.
Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)Week 4PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.
Percentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 1 through Week 8Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 8 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects.
Percentage of Participants With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 1 through Week 8Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 8 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures with treatment, sex, week, treatment by week and baseline as fixed effects.
Percentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache AttacksBaseline, Week 3Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Percentage of participants with 50% or greater reduction from baseline at week 3 was analyzed using Koch's nonparametric randomization-based analysis of covariance method. This method adjusted for pooled investigative site by including it as a stratification variable. It also adjusted for sex and baseline value.
Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to GalcanezumabBaseline through Week 8Treatment emergent (TE) ADA evaluable participant is considered to be TE ADA+ if the subject has at least one post-baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement. If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the participant is TE ADA+ if there is at least one post-baseline result of ADA present with titer \>= 1: 20.
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Month 1 through Month 6C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal ideation: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods without intent to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Month 1 through Month 6C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal behavior: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of GalcanezumabWeek 4

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo once a month for 2 months by SC injection. Participants did not receive any intervention during post treatment follow-up phase.
57
Galcanezumab 300mg
Participants received Galcanezumab 300mg once a month for two months by SC injection. Participants did not receive any intervention during post treatment follow-up phase.
49
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Post Treatment Follow-up PhaseLack of Efficacy11
Post Treatment Follow-up PhaseLost to Follow-up10
Post Treatment Follow-up PhaseProtocol Violation10
Post Treatment Follow-up PhaseWithdrawal by Subject01
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event12
Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy81
Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up10
Treatment PhaseProtocol Violation(did not receive drug)03
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboGalcanezumab 300mgTotal
Age, Continuous45.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.32
47.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.74
46.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.05
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants41 Participants86 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Lifetime suicidal behavior prior to screening0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Lifetime suicidal ideation prior to screening5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants43 Participants90 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants41 Participants88 Participants
Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks17.30 Cluster Headache Attacks per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.05
17.82 Cluster Headache Attacks per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12
17.54 Cluster Headache Attacks per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 570 / 490 / 500 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 577 / 493 / 501 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 492 / 500 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks

Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 3 from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 3

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had baseline and at least one post baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboOverall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks-5.22 Cluster Headache Attacks per WeekStandard Error 1.33
Galcanezumab 300mgOverall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks-8.69 Cluster Headache Attacks per WeekStandard Error 1.42
p-value: 0.03695% CI: [-6.72, -0.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks

Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Overall mean change from baseline is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 8 from MMRM analysis. Least Square (LS) means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, sex, pooled investigative site, week, baseline, and treatment by week as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had baseline and at least one post baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboOverall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks-9.97 Cluster Headache Attacks per WeekStandard Error 0.95
Galcanezumab 300mgOverall Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks-10.80 Cluster Headache Attacks per WeekStandard Error 1
p-value: 0.49395% CI: [-3.23, 1.57]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab

Treatment emergent (TE) ADA evaluable participant is considered to be TE ADA+ if the subject has at least one post-baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement. If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the participant is TE ADA+ if there is at least one post-baseline result of ADA present with titer \>= 1: 20.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had non-missing baseline ADA result, and at least one non-missing post baseline ADA result.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab0 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Galcanezumab0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at week 8.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)66.1 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)71.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.57595% CI: [0.502, 3.426]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Percentage of participants were derived with a generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, baseline cluster headache attack category, month, and treatment by month as fixed effects.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had PGI-I measurement at week4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)46.4 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants Reporting a Score of 1 or 2 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)72.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.01695% CI: [1.242, 7.469]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks

Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 8 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures with treatment, sex, week, treatment by week and baseline as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had baseline and at least one post baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks78.9 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks77.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.84195% CI: [0.449, 1.923]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks

Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Mean percentage of participants is derived from the average of weeks 1 to 8 from generalized linear mixed model repeated measures method with treatment, sex, week, treatment by week, and baseline as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had baseline and at least one post baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks70.4 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Number of Weekly Cluster Headache Attacks69.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.9195% CI: [0.512, 1.819]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks

Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary. Percentage of participants with 50% or greater reduction from baseline at week 3 was analyzed using Koch's nonparametric randomization-based analysis of covariance method. This method adjusted for pooled investigative site by including it as a stratification variable. It also adjusted for sex and baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had baseline and at least one post baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks52.63 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants With 50% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in the Weekly Number of Cluster Headache Attacks71.43 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.046ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal behavior: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide.

Time frame: Month 1 through Month 6

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post baseline C-SSRS assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)0 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. The scale includes suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior occurred. Some questions are binary responses (yes/no) and some are on a scale of 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity). Suicidal ideation: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods without intent to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.

Time frame: Month 1 through Month 6

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post baseline C-SSRS assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)0 percentage of participants
Galcanezumab 300mgPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed by Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Time frame: Week 4

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had measurable PK samples.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab20200 Nanogram per Milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 6880
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab

Time frame: Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had measurable PK samples.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration of Galcanezumab26400 Nanogram per Milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11200

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026