Developmental Coordination Disorder
Conditions
Brief summary
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback mental attention-neuromuscular training (AT-NMT), neuromuscular training (NMT) alone, EEG biofeedback mental attention training (AT) alone, and no intervention for improving reactive balance performance among children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Design: A single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. Sample: 172 children with DCD. Interventions: AT-NMT, NMT, AT, or no intervention for 12 weeks. Major outcomes: Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. A motor control test (MCT) will give a composite latency score, prefrontal cortex EEG recordings during MCT will measure the mental attention level, and surface electromyography recordings during MCT will indicate the lower limb muscle onset latency.
Detailed description
Hypothesis: The Investigators hypothesize that the reactive balance performance in children with DCD can be best improved by treating both their mental attention and neuromuscular deficits. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of AT-NMT, NMT alone, AT alone, and no intervention for improving reactive balance performance among children with DCD. Design: A single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. Sample: 172 children with DCD. Interventions: AT-NMT, NMT, AT, or no intervention for 12 weeks. Major outcomes: Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. A motor control test (MCT) will give a composite latency score, prefrontal cortex EEG recordings during MCT will measure the mental attention level, and surface electromyography recordings during MCT will indicate the lower limb muscle onset latency. Anticipated results and clinical significance: Children with DCD who receive AT-NMT will have the best reactive balance performance outcomes. If the results are positive, this novel training regime can be readily adopted in clinical practice. AT-NMT will improve overall well-being in these children and have positive socio-economic implications such as shorter rehabilitation periods and reduced healthcare costs.
Interventions
OTHEREEG biofeedback mental attention-neuromuscular training
Mental attention training using EEG biofeedback and neuromuscular training using physio-therapeutic exercises
OTHERNeuromuscular training
Neuromuscular training using physio-therapeutic exercises
OTHEREEG biofeedback mental attention training
Mental attention training using EEG biofeedback
Sponsors
The University of Hong Kong
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. 6 to 9 years old; 2. a formal diagnosis of DCD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) at a child assessment center; 3. a Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency giving a gross motor composite score of ≤42; 4. a Child Behavior Checklist attention problem subscale T score of ≥54.5, indicating an attention deficit; 5. attending a local mainstream school; 6. an intelligence level within the normal range; and 7. no experience in using the Brain Computer Interface system or similar apparatus.
Exclusion criteria
1. a diagnosis of neurological or other movement disorder; 2. any cognitive, psychiatric (comorbid ADHD will not be excluded), congenital, musculoskeletal or cardiopulmonary disorder that can affect motor performance; 3. receiving active therapies or treatments including complementary and alternative medicine; 4. demonstrating excessive disruptive behavior; or 5. those unable to follow instructions adequately.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change in motor control test composite latency score | Baseline (0 month), post-intervention (3 months), and 3-month follow-up (6 months) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change in EEG mental attention level | Baseline (0 month), post-intervention (3 months), and 3-month follow-up (6 months) |
| Change in surface EMG lower limb muscle onset latency | Baseline (0 month), post-intervention (3 months), and 3-month follow-up (6 months) |
Countries
Hong Kong
Contacts
Primary ContactShirley SM Fong, PT, PhD
Outcome results
None listed