Skip to content

3D HD Versus 2D HD in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Three-dimensional High-definition (3DHD) Laparoscopy Versus Two-dimensional High-definition (2DHD) Laparoscopy in Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02396940
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-03-24
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2018-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Hernia, Inguinal

Keywords

3D, Three-dimensional, Laparoscopy, Inguinal hernia repair

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare 3D-laparoscopy versus 2D-laparoscopy with the use of HD resolution in inguinal hernia repair in terms of error rating, performance time and subjective assessment.

Detailed description

Experimental studies have shown that even experienced surgeons gain from stereoscopy when solving both easy and complex tasks. Inguinal hernia repair is a specialist operation and the large flow makes this type of operation suitable for exploring any advantage of three-dimensional laparoscopy for the experienced surgeon.

Interventions

Olympus 3D laparoscopy ENDOEYE FLEX in high definition with the use of passive, polarizing glasses.

Placebo

Sponsors

Herlev Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair (out-patient treatment)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous lower abdominal surgery * ASA-score 3 or above

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of errors during the dissection of the hernia sacExpected duration: 20 minutesThe unedited videos of the operations will be assessed according to GERT (Generic Error Rating Tool) by three surgeons, blinded to which optical modalities is used during the operations as done in a previous pilot study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of surgeryExpected duration: 1 hour
The need for conversion to open surgeryintraoperative, expected duration of surgery: 1 hour
Estimated blood loss in mlintraoperative, expected duration of surgery: 1 hour
Duration of the dissection of the hernia sac.Expected duration: 20 minutes
Assessment of fatigue and perceived exertionan expected average of 15 minutes before and after the operationSubjective assessment. The surgeon will fill out questionnaires and scales
Evaluation of the optical modality and mental load assessmentan expected average of 15 minutes after the operationSubjective assessment. The surgeon will fill out questionnaires and scales
Intraoperative complicationsintraoperative, expected duration of surgery: 1 hour

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactCharlotte Fergo
charlotte.sayaka.fergo@regionh.dk

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026