Skip to content

Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of 6 Versus 3 Steps for Hand Hygiene

Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Two Hand Hygiene Techniques Using Alcohol Based Hand Rub on Hand Surface Coverage and Reducing Bacterial Hand Contamination

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02396836
Acronym
SHoRT
Enrollment
120
Registered
2015-03-24
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2015-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hand Hygiene

Keywords

Hand hygiene, Hand decontamination, Microbial load, Hand coverage, Glove juice technique, Ayliffe technique, 6 step technique

Brief summary

The aim is to compare the effectiveness of the 6 step hand rub technique versus 3 step hand rub technique in hand coverage and in reducing bacterial contamination on the hands of healthcare workers in practice. Research questions 1. What is the effectiveness of the 6 step technique in hand coverage compared to the 3 step technique? 1. What are the most frequently missed sites in hand surface coverage using 6 steps compared to 3 steps? 2. What is the reduction in bacterial contamination of the hand with the 6 step compared to the 3 step technique? 2. Does site missed or coverage relate to bacterial load? 3. What is the time taken for 6 step technique versus 3 step technique?

Detailed description

The 6 step for decontamination of healthcare workers hand is recommended by the World Health Organization but the 3 step technique is easy to perform and has been shown by some studies to be effective. Compliance with the 6 step technique is not optimum. If the 3 step was more as or more effective than the 6 step compliance with it could be compared with that for the 6 step. No randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of these two techniques using alcohol based hand rub has been conducted.

Interventions

OTHER6 step technique

Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the World Health Organizations 6 step technique

OTHER3 step technique

Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the 3 step technique

Sponsors

University of Strathclyde
CollaboratorOTHER
University of East Anglia
CollaboratorOTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
CollaboratorOTHER
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Glasgow Caledonian University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Medical and nursing staff performing a clinical procedure

Exclusion criteria

* A procedure requiring use of gloves * A self declared active skin condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Microbial load on dominant handup to 5 minA glove juice technique will be used to assess the microbial load on the dominant hand of healthcare workers following use of alcohol hand rub after a clinical procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hand coverageup to 5 minUltra violet box will be used to assess hand coverage of the hands of healthcare workers following use of alcohol hand rub.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026