Skip to content

Healing of Persistent Epithelial Defects

Comparison of Standard of Care Treatments for Post-operative Non-healing Epithelial Defects

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02395952
Enrollment
0
Registered
2015-03-24
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2019-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cornea

Keywords

cornea, epithelial defect, amniotic membrane

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the relative efficacy of four different treatment modalities (i.e. aggressive lubrication, bandage contact lens, Ambiodisk amniotic membrane, Prokera amniotic membrane) in the healing of persistent corneal epithelial defects following retina surgery.

Interventions

frequent topical lubrication with artificial tears

DEVICEAcuvue Oasys Bandage Contact Lens
DEVICEAmbiodisk
DEVICEProkera

Sponsors

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

3.1 Inclusion Criteria * Adults aged 18 and older (inclusive) at the time of study enrollment * Recent history of retina surgery * Presence of persistent epithelial defect 7 days or later after surgery * English speaking 3.2

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking patients * Inability to incapacity to provide consent for the study * History of corneal epithelial or limbal stem cell disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Abscence of persistent epithelial defect22 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of epithelial healing in mm2/day22 days
Infection22 days

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026