Atopic Dermatitis
Conditions
Keywords
Eczema
Brief summary
The primary objective of the study was to assess the ability of different Dupilumab dose regimens, administered as monotherapy, to maintain the treatment response achieved after 16 weeks of initial treatment with Dupilumab monotherapy compared to placebo.
Interventions
Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) was administered.
Subcutaneous injection of Placebo (for Dupilumab) was administered once weekly (QW).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Must have completed the treatment phase in 1 of the two 16-week initial treatment studies (R668-AD-1334 or R668-AD-1416). 2. Must have achieved at least 1 of the following 2 treatment success criteria: Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) = 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at week 16 OR Eczema Area and Severity Index \>= 75% (EASI-75) (at least 75% reduction in EASI score from baseline to week 16) 3. Must be willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures 4. Must provide signed informed consent 5. Must be able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires Key
Exclusion criteria
1. Receipt of rescue medication for AD in the initial treatment study 2. Any conditions that require permanent discontinuation of study treatment in either initial treatment study 3. Planned or anticipated major surgical procedure during the participants's participation in this study 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during this study 5. Women unwilling to use adequate birth control, if of reproductive potential\* and sexually active. Adequate birth control is defined as agreement to consistently practice an effective and accepted method of contraception, whenever engaging in heterosexual intercourse, throughout the duration of the study and for 120 days after last dose of study drug. These include hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, or double barrier contraception (e.g, condom + diaphragm), or a male partner with documented vasectomy. Additional requirements for acceptable contraception may apply in certain countries, based on local regulations. Investigators in these countries will be notified accordingly in a protocol clarification letter. (\*For females, menopause is defined as at least 12 consecutive months without menses; if in question, a follicle stimulating hormone level of \>= 25 milli units per milliliter (mU/mL) must be documented. Hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation must be documented, as applicable; if documented, women with these conditions are not required to use additional contraception).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) | Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study) | The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Difference of percent change in EASI between current study baseline and week 36 in from parent study baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) was reported. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before multiple imputation (MI). |
| Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36 | Week 36 | The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved \>=75% overall improvement in EASI score at Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Patients with missing value at week 36 were considered as a non-responder. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35 | Baseline up to Week 35 | Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing peak NRS at Week 35 were considered as non-responders. |
| Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline | Baseline up to Week 36 | IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). |
| Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36 | Week 36 | IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as responders (i.e. having a increase 3 or 4 of IGA value). |
| Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36 | Week 36 | The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50 responders were the participants who achieved \>= 50% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI-50 scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36 | Baseline, Week 36 | The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing Values at Week 36 were imputed by using multiple imputation method. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36 | Baseline, Week 36 | SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35 | Baseline, Week 35 | Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36 | Baseline through Week 36 | BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI. |
| Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36 | Baseline, Week 36 | IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at baseline and maintaining within 1 point of baseline were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing value at a visit were considered as a non-responder. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36 | Baseline through Week 36 | The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36 | Baseline through Week 36 | HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI. |
| Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline | Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study) | SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI. |
| Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline | Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 35 (Current study) | Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI. |
| Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Baseline through Week 36 | Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment- emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on- treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study \[Week 36\]). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life- threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. |
| Annualized Event Rate of Flares | Baseline through week 36 | Rate of Flares defined as worsening of disease requiring initiation or escalation of rescue treatment. |
| Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period | Baseline through Week 36 | Well-controlled weeks are those in which participants during their weekly IVRS call completion has their eczema been well-controlled over the last week during which no rescue treatments were administered. Percentage of well-controlled weeks during the on-treatment period were reported. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36 | Baseline through Week 36 | The POEM is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life \[QOL\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI. |
| Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36 | Week 36 | IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at week 36 were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted in 15 countries between 25 March 2015 and 18 October 2016. A total of 422 participants were randomized in the study.
Pre-assignment details
Out of the 475 participants, 422 were randomized and 420 received either placebo or Dupilumab. Participants were randomized in 2:1:1:1 ratio to receive Dupilumab 300 milligram (mg) once weekly/twice weekly (QW/Q2W), Dupilumab 300 mg four times a week (Q4W), Dupilumab 300 mg eight times a week (Q8W) and Placebo.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo QW Subcutaneous injection of Placebo (for Dupilumab) was administered weekly (QW) from Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 36. | 83 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) once every eight week (Q8W) from Week 1 to Week 36. | 84 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) once every four week (Q4W) from Week 1 to Week 36. | 86 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) once every week (QW) or twice a week (Q2W) from Week 1 to Week 36. | 169 |
| Total | 422 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Consent withdrawn with no reason given | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Consent withdrawn with personal reason | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other than specified above | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Sponsor decision | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Placebo QW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.98 | 38.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.76 | 38.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94 | 38.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.64 | 38.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.46 |
| Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement with AD | 7.9 percentage of body surface area STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.04 | 9.3 percentage of body surface area STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51 | 7.9 percentage of body surface area STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02 | 8.1 percentage of body surface area STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21 | 8.2 percentage of body surface area STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.18 |
| Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score | 3.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.76 | 3.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.93 | 3.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.21 | 3.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.25 | 3.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.06 |
| Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score | 2.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33 | 2.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31 | 2.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92 | 2.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.31 | 2.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.78 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 10 Participants | 2 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 81 Participants | 85 Participants | 155 Participants | 75 Participants | 396 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) | 6.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.88 | 6.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.11 | 6.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 | 6.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.43 | 6.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 18 Participants | 16 Participants | 31 Participants | 17 Participants | 82 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 56 Participants | 64 Participants | 124 Participants | 54 Participants | 298 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Europe | 34 Participants | 36 Participants | 69 Participants | 33 Participants | 172 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 23 Participants | 12 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment North America | 39 Participants | 38 Participants | 77 Participants | 38 Participants | 192 Participants |
| SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score | 17.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41 | 17.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59 | 17.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.49 | 16.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03 | 17.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.18 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 33 Participants | 43 Participants | 87 Participants | 32 Participants | 195 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 51 Participants | 43 Participants | 82 Participants | 51 Participants | 227 Participants |
| Total Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) | 7.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.87 | 7.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53 | 6.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.94 | 5.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36 | 6.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.53 |
| Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) | 2.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.27 | 3.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.16 | 2.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.92 | 2.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11 | 2.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.08 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 82 | 0 / 84 | 1 / 87 | 0 / 167 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 55 / 82 | 43 / 84 | 47 / 87 | 72 / 167 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 82 | 3 / 84 | 4 / 87 | 6 / 167 |
Outcome results
Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769)
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Difference of percent change in EASI between current study baseline and week 36 in from parent study baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) was reported. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before multiple imputation (MI).
Time frame: Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study)
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) includes all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) | 21.67 percent change | Standard Error 3.134 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) | 6.84 percent change | Standard Error 2.434 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) | 3.84 percent change | Standard Error 2.283 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) | 0.06 percent change | Standard Error 1.736 |
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved \>=75% overall improvement in EASI score at Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Patients with missing value at week 36 were considered as a non-responder.
Time frame: Week 36
Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with EASI-75 at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36 | 30.4 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36 | 54.9 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36 | 58.3 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36 | 71.6 percentage of participants |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36 | 9.16 meter square | Standard Error 1.642 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36 | 2.74 meter square | Standard Error 1.53 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36 | 1.74 meter square | Standard Error 1.457 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36 | -1.27 meter square | Standard Error 1.044 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36
The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36 | 3.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.52 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36 | 1.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.46 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36 | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.48 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36 | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.33 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing Values at Week 36 were imputed by using multiple imputation method.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36 | 6.61 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.799 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36 | 1.75 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.738 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36 | 1.37 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.735 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36 | 0.09 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.511 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36
HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.6 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36 | 0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.52 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.54 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.39 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 35
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35 | 2.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35 | 1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35 | 0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35 | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36
SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36 | 18.61 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.107 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36 | 6.62 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.01 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36 | 2.25 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.899 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36 | 0.99 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.35 |
Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36
The POEM is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life \[QOL\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36 | 7.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36 | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.78 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.73 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36 | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.56 |
Annualized Event Rate of Flares
Rate of Flares defined as worsening of disease requiring initiation or escalation of rescue treatment.
Time frame: Baseline through week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Annualized Event Rate of Flares | 0.75 events per year |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Annualized Event Rate of Flares | 0.60 events per year |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Annualized Event Rate of Flares | 0.39 events per year |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Annualized Event Rate of Flares | 0.24 events per year |
Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment- emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on- treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study \[Week 36\]). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life- threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 0.12 events per year |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 0.07 events per year |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 0.02 events per year |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 0.02 events per year |
Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Time frame: Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 35 (Current study)
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline | 35.6 percent change | Standard Error 4.32 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline | 16.7 percent change | Standard Error 4.09 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline | 8.6 percent change | Standard Error 4.02 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline | -0.1 percent change | Standard Error 3.05 |
Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline
SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Time frame: Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study)
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline | 28.97 Percent change | Standard Error 3.683 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline | 10.42 Percent change | Standard Error 2.988 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline | 2.21 Percent change | Standard Error 2.743 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline | 0.33 Percent change | Standard Error 2.092 |
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at week 36 were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 36
Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from IVRS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36 | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36 | 32.8 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36 | 43.9 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36 | 54.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at baseline and maintaining within 1 point of baseline were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing value at a visit were considered as a non-responder.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from Interactive voice response system (IVRS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36 | 28.6 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36 | 62.1 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36 | 70.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50 responders were the participants who achieved \>= 50% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI-50 scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 36
Population: FAS population was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36 | 39.8 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36 | 54.8 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36 | 60.5 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36 | 73.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as responders (i.e. having a increase 3 or 4 of IGA value).
Time frame: Week 36
Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from IVRS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36 | 48.4 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36 | 34.8 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36 | 26.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing peak NRS at Week 35 were considered as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 35
Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with NRS \<= 7 at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35 | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35 | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35 | 49.4 percentage of participants |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35 | 33.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period
Well-controlled weeks are those in which participants during their weekly IVRS call completion has their eczema been well-controlled over the last week during which no rescue treatments were administered. Percentage of well-controlled weeks during the on-treatment period were reported.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Population: The safety analysis set (SAF) included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this endpoint. One participant was randomized to Dupilumab Q2W/QW, but treated per Dupilumab Q4W arm and included in SAF.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period | 40.9 percentage of weeks | Standard Deviation 30.35 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period | 53.2 percentage of weeks | Standard Deviation 32.95 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period | 52.3 percentage of weeks | Standard Deviation 35.96 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period | 63.6 percentage of weeks | Standard Deviation 32.08 |
Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline
IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 36
Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from IVRS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo QW | Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline | 57 Days |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W | Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline | 85 Days |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W | Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline | 80 Days |
| Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW | Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline | 114 Days |