Skip to content

A Study to Confirm the Efficacy and Safety of Different Dupilumab Dose Regimens in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Dupilumab Dose Regimens Administered as Monotherapy for Maintaining Treatment Response in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02395133
Acronym
SOLO-CONTINUE
Enrollment
422
Registered
2015-03-20
Start date
2015-03-25
Completion date
2016-10-18
Last updated
2020-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

Eczema

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study was to assess the ability of different Dupilumab dose regimens, administered as monotherapy, to maintain the treatment response achieved after 16 weeks of initial treatment with Dupilumab monotherapy compared to placebo.

Interventions

DRUGDupilumab

Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) was administered.

DRUGPlacebo

Subcutaneous injection of Placebo (for Dupilumab) was administered once weekly (QW).

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Must have completed the treatment phase in 1 of the two 16-week initial treatment studies (R668-AD-1334 or R668-AD-1416). 2. Must have achieved at least 1 of the following 2 treatment success criteria: Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) = 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at week 16 OR Eczema Area and Severity Index \>= 75% (EASI-75) (at least 75% reduction in EASI score from baseline to week 16) 3. Must be willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures 4. Must provide signed informed consent 5. Must be able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Receipt of rescue medication for AD in the initial treatment study 2. Any conditions that require permanent discontinuation of study treatment in either initial treatment study 3. Planned or anticipated major surgical procedure during the participants's participation in this study 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during this study 5. Women unwilling to use adequate birth control, if of reproductive potential\* and sexually active. Adequate birth control is defined as agreement to consistently practice an effective and accepted method of contraception, whenever engaging in heterosexual intercourse, throughout the duration of the study and for 120 days after last dose of study drug. These include hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, or double barrier contraception (e.g, condom + diaphragm), or a male partner with documented vasectomy. Additional requirements for acceptable contraception may apply in certain countries, based on local regulations. Investigators in these countries will be notified accordingly in a protocol clarification letter. (\*For females, menopause is defined as at least 12 consecutive months without menses; if in question, a follicle stimulating hormone level of \>= 25 milli units per milliliter (mU/mL) must be documented. Hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation must be documented, as applicable; if documented, women with these conditions are not required to use additional contraception).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769)Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study)The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Difference of percent change in EASI between current study baseline and week 36 in from parent study baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) was reported. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before multiple imputation (MI).
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36Week 36The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved \>=75% overall improvement in EASI score at Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Patients with missing value at week 36 were considered as a non-responder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35Baseline up to Week 35Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing peak NRS at Week 35 were considered as non-responders.
Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at BaselineBaseline up to Week 36IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36Week 36IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as responders (i.e. having a increase 3 or 4 of IGA value).
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36Week 36The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50 responders were the participants who achieved \>= 50% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI-50 scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36Baseline, Week 36The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing Values at Week 36 were imputed by using multiple imputation method.
Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36Baseline, Week 36SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35Baseline, Week 35Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36Baseline through Week 36BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36Baseline, Week 36IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at baseline and maintaining within 1 point of baseline were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing value at a visit were considered as a non-responder.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36Baseline through Week 36The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36Baseline through Week 36HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study BaselineBaseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study)SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study BaselineBaseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 35 (Current study)Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.
Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline through Week 36Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment- emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on- treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study \[Week 36\]). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life- threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.
Annualized Event Rate of FlaresBaseline through week 36Rate of Flares defined as worsening of disease requiring initiation or escalation of rescue treatment.
Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment PeriodBaseline through Week 36Well-controlled weeks are those in which participants during their weekly IVRS call completion has their eczema been well-controlled over the last week during which no rescue treatments were administered. Percentage of well-controlled weeks during the on-treatment period were reported.
Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36Baseline through Week 36The POEM is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life \[QOL\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36Week 36IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at week 36 were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted in 15 countries between 25 March 2015 and 18 October 2016. A total of 422 participants were randomized in the study.

Pre-assignment details

Out of the 475 participants, 422 were randomized and 420 received either placebo or Dupilumab. Participants were randomized in 2:1:1:1 ratio to receive Dupilumab 300 milligram (mg) once weekly/twice weekly (QW/Q2W), Dupilumab 300 mg four times a week (Q4W), Dupilumab 300 mg eight times a week (Q8W) and Placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo QW
Subcutaneous injection of Placebo (for Dupilumab) was administered weekly (QW) from Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 36.
83
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8W
Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) once every eight week (Q8W) from Week 1 to Week 36.
84
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4W
Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) once every four week (Q4W) from Week 1 to Week 36.
86
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QW
Subcutaneous injection of Dupilumab 300 mg alternatively with placebo (matched to Dupilumab) once every week (QW) or twice a week (Q2W) from Week 1 to Week 36.
169
Total422

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event4130
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn with no reason given1302
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn with personal reason0103
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1011
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0110
Overall StudyOther than specified above5224
Overall StudyPregnancy0030
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1103
Overall StudySponsor decision2001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDupilumab 300 mg Q8WDupilumab 300 mg Q4WDupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPlacebo QWTotal
Age, Continuous37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.98
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.76
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.64
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.46
Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement with AD7.9 percentage of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.04
9.3 percentage of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51
7.9 percentage of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
8.1 percentage of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21
8.2 percentage of body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.18
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score3.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.76
3.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.93
3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.21
3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.25
3.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.06
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score2.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31
2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.31
2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants10 Participants2 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
81 Participants85 Participants155 Participants75 Participants396 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)6.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.88
6.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.11
6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
6.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.43
6.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
18 Participants16 Participants31 Participants17 Participants82 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants4 Participants7 Participants7 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants64 Participants124 Participants54 Participants298 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
34 Participants36 Participants69 Participants33 Participants172 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
11 Participants12 Participants23 Participants12 Participants58 Participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
39 Participants38 Participants77 Participants38 Participants192 Participants
SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score17.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41
17.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59
17.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.49
16.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03
17.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.18
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants43 Participants87 Participants32 Participants195 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants43 Participants82 Participants51 Participants227 Participants
Total Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)7.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.87
7.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.94
5.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36
6.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.53
Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.27
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.16
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.92
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.08

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 820 / 841 / 870 / 167
other
Total, other adverse events
55 / 8243 / 8447 / 8772 / 167
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 823 / 844 / 876 / 167

Outcome results

Primary

Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769)

The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Difference of percent change in EASI between current study baseline and week 36 in from parent study baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769) was reported. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before multiple imputation (MI).

Time frame: Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study)

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769)21.67 percent changeStandard Error 3.134
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769)6.84 percent changeStandard Error 2.434
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769)3.84 percent changeStandard Error 2.283
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in EASI From Parent Study Baseline (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769)0.06 percent changeStandard Error 1.736
Comparison: A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the co-primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints in a pre-specified order. Testing was then performed sequentially in the order the endpoints are reported. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA method.p-value: =0.000195% CI: [-22.34, -7.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the co-primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints in a pre-specified order. Testing was then performed sequentially in the order the endpoints are reported. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA method.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-25.33, -10.34]ANCOVA
Comparison: A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the co-primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints in a pre-specified order. Testing was then performed sequentially in the order the endpoints are reported. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA method.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-28.36, -14.87]ANCOVA
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 36

The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved \>=75% overall improvement in EASI score at Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Patients with missing value at week 36 were considered as a non-responder.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with EASI-75 at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QWPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 3630.4 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 3654.9 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 3658.3 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index >= 75% [EASI-75] at Baseline of Current Study Maintaining EASI-75 at Week 3671.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: =0.00495% CI: [9.7, 39.29]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: =0.000495% CI: [13.32, 42.58]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [28.93, 53.52]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36

BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 369.16 meter squareStandard Error 1.642
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 362.74 meter squareStandard Error 1.53
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 361.74 meter squareStandard Error 1.457
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Through Week 36-1.27 meter squareStandard Error 1.044
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36

The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The 10 questions assessed QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring of 0 (absent disease) to 30 (severe disease); a high score was indicative of a poor QOL. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 363.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 361.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 360.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Through Week 36-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 36

The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing Values at Week 36 were imputed by using multiple imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 366.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.799
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 361.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.738
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 361.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.735
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 360.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.511
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36

HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven items relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (minimum score) - 3 (maximum score) and this means that a person can score between 0 (no symptoms) and 21 (severe symptoms) for either anxiety or depression. Cut-offs for identifying psychiatric distress has been reported as 7 to 8 for possible presence, 10 to 11 for probable presence, and 14 to 15 for severe anxiety or depression. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 360.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 360.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 360.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) Through Week 36-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35

Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 35

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 352.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 351.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 350.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 35-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 36

SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 3618.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.107
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAbsolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 366.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.01
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 362.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.899
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAbsolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 360.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.35
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36

The POEM is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life \[QOL\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing (censoring) before MI.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWAbsolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 367.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAbsolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 362.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAbsolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 360.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAbsolute Change From Baseline Through in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Through Week 36-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Secondary

Annualized Event Rate of Flares

Rate of Flares defined as worsening of disease requiring initiation or escalation of rescue treatment.

Time frame: Baseline through week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo QWAnnualized Event Rate of Flares0.75 events per year
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAnnualized Event Rate of Flares0.60 events per year
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAnnualized Event Rate of Flares0.39 events per year
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAnnualized Event Rate of Flares0.24 events per year
Secondary

Annualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment- emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on- treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study \[Week 36\]). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life- threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo QWAnnualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)0.12 events per year
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WAnnualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)0.07 events per year
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WAnnualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)0.02 events per year
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWAnnualized Event Rate of Skin Infection Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)0.02 events per year
Secondary

Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline

Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.

Time frame: Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 35 (Current study)

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline35.6 percent changeStandard Error 4.32
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline16.7 percent changeStandard Error 4.09
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline8.6 percent changeStandard Error 4.02
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 35 in Percent Change in Peak Weekly Pruritus NRS From Parent Study Baseline-0.1 percent changeStandard Error 3.05
Secondary

Difference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline

SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing before MI.

Time frame: Baseline (Parent Study), Baseline (Current Study) and Week 36 (Current study)

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline28.97 Percent changeStandard Error 3.683
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline10.42 Percent changeStandard Error 2.988
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline2.21 Percent changeStandard Error 2.743
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWDifference Between Current Study Baseline and Week 36 in Percent Change in SCORAD From Parent Study Baseline0.33 Percent changeStandard Error 2.092
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 36

IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at week 36 were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from IVRS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QWPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 3614.3 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 3632.8 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 3643.9 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response at 0 or 1 Point at Week 3654.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: =0.020995% CI: [4.14, 32.91]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: =0.000795% CI: [14.89, 44.42]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [27.42, 51.95]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 36

IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of 0 or 1 at baseline and maintaining within 1 point of baseline were reported as responders. Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing value at a visit were considered as a non-responder.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 36

Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from Interactive voice response system (IVRS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QWPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 3628.6 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 3650.0 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 3662.1 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Within 1 Point of Baseline at Week 3670.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: =0.01395% CI: [4.86, 38]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: =0.000395% CI: [17.38, 49.72]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [28.36, 55.76]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 36

The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50 responders were the participants who achieved \>= 50% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 36. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI-50 scores at Week 36 were considered as non-responders.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: FAS population was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QWPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 3639.8 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 3654.8 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 3660.5 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPercentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (>= 50% Reduction in EASI Score) at Week 3673.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 36

IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 36 were considered as responders (i.e. having a increase 3 or 4 of IGA value).

Time frame: Week 36

Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from IVRS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QWPercentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 3666.7 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 3648.4 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 3634.8 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPercentage of Participants With Increased Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score 3 or 4 at Week 3626.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 35

Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 \[0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable\]). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing peak NRS at Week 35 were considered as non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 35

Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with NRS \<= 7 at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QWPercentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 3570.0 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 3555.6 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 3549.4 percentage of participants
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPercentage of Participants With Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Increased by 3 or More Points From Baseline to Week 3533.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: 0.104895% CI: [-29.21, 0.32]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: =0.010795% CI: [-35.32, -5.89]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint was statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region, baseline disease severity and Dupilumab regimen received in parent studies.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-48.4, -23.74]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period

Well-controlled weeks are those in which participants during their weekly IVRS call completion has their eczema been well-controlled over the last week during which no rescue treatments were administered. Percentage of well-controlled weeks during the on-treatment period were reported.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 36

Population: The safety analysis set (SAF) included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this endpoint. One participant was randomized to Dupilumab Q2W/QW, but treated per Dupilumab Q4W arm and included in SAF.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QWPercentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period40.9 percentage of weeksStandard Deviation 30.35
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WPercentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period53.2 percentage of weeksStandard Deviation 32.95
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WPercentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period52.3 percentage of weeksStandard Deviation 35.96
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWPercentage of Well-Controlled Weeks During the On-treatment Period63.6 percentage of weeksStandard Deviation 32.08
Secondary

Time to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline

IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 36

Population: FAS population was used. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline from IVRS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo QWTime to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline57 Days
Dupilumab 300 mg Q8WTime to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline85 Days
Dupilumab 300 mg Q4WTime to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline80 Days
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W/QWTime to First Event of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) >= 2 for Participants With IGA 0 or 1 at Baseline114 Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026