Skip to content

Acceptance & Tolerance Study of Multifocal Contact Lenses by Functional Emmetropes

Acceptance & Tolerance Study of Multifocal Contact Lenses by Functional Emmetropes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02394925
Enrollment
113
Registered
2015-03-20
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2015-09-01
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vision Correction

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine the retention rate over a two month period of vision correction in emmetropic, presbyopes fitted with multifocal contact lenses.

Interventions

DEVICEMultifocal Test Contact lens

Used in a daily wear modality

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject must read, understand and sign the Statement of Informed Consent and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 3. The subject must be between 40 and 70 years of age. 4. The subject's vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 to +2.00 in each eye. 5. The subject's refractive cylinder must be less than or equal to -0.75 D in each eye. 6. The subject's ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 D to +2.50. 7. The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently pregnant or lactating (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued). 2. Any ocular or systemic allergies that contraindicate contact lens wear. 3. Any ocular or systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, that contraindicates contact lens wear. 4. Any ocular abnormality that may interfere with contact lens wear. 5. Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops. 6. Any previous intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.). 7. Any grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g. edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) which may contraindicate contact lens wear. 8. History of herpetic keratitis. 9. Any ocular infection or inflammation. 10. Any corneal distortion or irregular cornea. 11. History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus. 12. Any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV). 13. History of diabetes. 14. Current or previous history of being prescribed a correction for distance vision. 15. Current or previous history of contact lens wear. 16. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Successful Contact Lens Wearers2 months post wearProportion of Successful contact lens wearers is based on a subject's responses to two questionnaire items, Overall Quality of Vision and Overall Comfort. Each item uses a 6 response like-rt scale (0= Not Applicable, 1=Excellent, 2=Very Good, 3=Good, 4=Fair and 5=Poor). The data from each item was dichotomized into two groups. If a subject responded Excellent, Very Good or Good then the response=1, otherwise the response=0. The proportion of subjects with response=1 was reported as the proportion of successful contact lens wearers.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 113 enrolled into this study. Of the enrolled, 5 subjects did not meet the eligibility criteria and 108 subjects were dispensed the study lens. Of the dispensed subjects 79 completed the study while 29 subjects were discontinued.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dispensed Subjects
All subjects in that were dispensed the study lens.
108
Total108

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLens Discomfort3
Overall StudyLens handling difficulities5
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up9
Overall StudyNo longer meet eligibility criteria1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation5
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Visual Response5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDispensed Subjects
Age, Continuous49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.13
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
73 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
62 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Successful Contact Lens Wearers

Proportion of Successful contact lens wearers is based on a subject's responses to two questionnaire items, Overall Quality of Vision and Overall Comfort. Each item uses a 6 response like-rt scale (0= Not Applicable, 1=Excellent, 2=Very Good, 3=Good, 4=Fair and 5=Poor). The data from each item was dichotomized into two groups. If a subject responded Excellent, Very Good or Good then the response=1, otherwise the response=0. The proportion of subjects with response=1 was reported as the proportion of successful contact lens wearers.

Time frame: 2 months post wear

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Etafilcon -PVP (Multi-focal)Proportion of Successful Contact Lens Wearers0.71 Proportion of Subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026