Skip to content

Endoscopic Nasogallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Cholecystecomy

Endoscopic Naso-gallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Elective Cholecystectomy in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis and a High Suspicion of Common Bile Duct Stone; A Prospective Randomized Preliminary Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02394327
Enrollment
35
Registered
2015-03-20
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2016-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholecystitis, Acute, Common Bile Duct Calculi

Brief summary

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard therapy for acute cholecystitis, but temporary decompression of the gallbladder (GB) through percutaneous or endoscopic route can be required to alleviate inflammatory process and reach an appropriate time for elective surgery in patients with high operative risk or marked local inflammation or organ dysfunction. Also preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often needed because common bile duct (CBD) stone is accompanied in patients with acute cholecystitis at reported rate from 7-20%. Two-steps approach of percutaneous transhepatic GB drainage (PTGBD) followed by ERCP or vice versa has been performed for the treatment of acute cholecystitis with concomitant CBD stone who are not suitable for urgent cholecystectomy. However single-step drainage of CBD and GB through ERCP and endoscopic transpapillary GB drainage (ETGD) using nasocystic tube or plastic stent has alternatively been attempted in patients who have contraindications for PTGBD. In clinical practice, many endoscopists have hesitated to perform ETGD because of its relatively low technical success rate and specific concern about post-ERCP adverse event but it minimizes catheter keeping duration, and provides effective clinical improvement via physiologic route. Currently there are scarce data on if ETGD using nasocystic tube or plastic stent are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.

Interventions

DEVICE7-Fr Pigtail type naso-cholecystic drainage tube (Liguory nasal biliary drainage set; Wilson-Cook Medical, Salem, NC, USA)

Endoscopic

DEVICE7-Fr double pigtail plastic stent (Zimmon; Wilson-Cook Medical, Salem, NC, USA)

Sponsors

Ajou University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* grade II or III acute cholecystitis met Tokyo 13 diagnostic criteria * a high suspicion of CBD stone based on laboratory and imaging study * informed consent given.

Exclusion criteria

* bilo-pancreatic malignancy or surgically altered enteric anatomy * subsequent elective surgery is expected to be impossible even after GB decompression based on American Society of Anesthesiologist class

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Techncal success rateFrom the time of randomization until the time when the endoscopic procedure is ended, assessed up to 24hoursThis outcome was defined as successful deep GB cannulation and placement of assigned drainage device by randomization, and determined by the operator based on the fluoroscoic images of the procedures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical success rateFrom the date of randomization until the date of clinical improvement (fever, leukocytosis, abdominal pain), assessed up to 72 hoursThis outcome was defined as improvement of three clinical parameters of acute cholecystitis (fever, abdominal pain, leukocytosis) within 72 hours following either type of ETGD procedure, and assessed by the review of patient's mediacal records.
early adverse eventFrom the date of the randomization until the date of the elective cholecystectomy, assessed up to 2 weeksThis outcome was defined as any procedure related event occurring between the endoscopic procedure and elective cholecystectomy, and assessed by the patient's medical records.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026