Skip to content

Effects of Topical Dynamic Phototherapy on the Microbiota of Chronic Wounds

Effects of Topical Dynamic Phototherapy (TDP) on the Microbiota of Chronic Wounds: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02392390
Acronym
PDT-Bactério
Enrollment
10
Registered
2015-03-19
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leg Ulcer

Keywords

Topical Dynamic Phototherapy, Microbiota

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to estimate the change in the relative numbers of commensal or low virulence potential bacteria before and after one session TDP.

Detailed description

The secondary objectives of this study are: * To estimate changes in several microbiological parameters over three time periods (before treatment, after applying the Metvixia® and after irradiation during a single TDP session). * Describe the evolution of the size and appearance of the wound 7d after the start of treatment * Describe the potential adverse events associated with a TDP session

Interventions

PROCEDURETopical Dynamic Phototherapy (TDP)

Metvixia cream is applied to the lesion (about 1mm thickness) and the treated zone is covered with an opaque dression for 3 hours. Any residual cream is removed an and the lesion immediately rinsed with saline solution when uncovering. One session (8 minutes) of phototherapy is then performed using an Altilite lamp in accordance with HAS (haute authorité de santé) recommendations.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient correctly informed concerning study implementation, objectives, constraints and patient rights * The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent * The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan * The patient presents with one or more leg ulcers (artieral, venous or mixed) * Afebrile patient without periulcerous erythema and who does not require antibiotic therapy * Patient who has not received antibiotic treatment during the last 7 Days Nota bene: Patients with multiple ulcers at different stages will be included for the wound corresponding to the highest stage. If the patient has multiple ulcers atn the same stage, the deepest wound will be considered.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient is participating in another interventional study, has participated in another interventional study with the past 3 months, or is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study * The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship * The patient refuses to sign the consent * It is impossible to correctly inform the patient * The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding * The patient has a contraindication for a treatment used in this study * Patient with an infected leg ulcer treated with antibiotics * Patients on curative anticoagulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The percentage of commensal or weak virulence potential bacteria among all bacteria species isolated per sampleBaseline (Day 0)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of bacteria taxa detected per sampleBaseline (Day 0)
The diversity of bacteria taxa detected per sample (Shannon's H with log2)Baseline (Day 0)Shannon's H with log2
The number of functional groups detected per sampleBaseline (Day 0)Function groups are predefined according to the presence/absence of each of the following factors: pathogen, anaerobic, cocci.
The percentage of commensal bacteria among bacteria species isolated per sampleBaseline (Day 0)
Adverse eventsDay 0
Visual analog scale for pain during the phototherapy sessionDay 0Scale from 0 to 10
The diversity of functional groups detected per sample (Shannon's H with log2)Baseline (Day 0)Shannon's H with log 2

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound appearanceDay 0 (baseline)burgeoning, fibrinous, necrotic, blistering or de-epidermisation, exudative, bad odor
Presence/absence of signs of infectionDay 0 to Day 7Purulent discharge, local inflammatory signs, rough bony contact, associated osteitis without bone contact, bacteremia, severe sepsis
Age in yearsDay 0 (baseline)
Irradiation dose (minutes)Day 0
Change in the size of the wound (mm^2)Day 7 versus baseline
GenderDay 0 (baseline)
Body mass indexDay 0 (baseline)
Number of lesionsDay 0 (baseline)
Initial wound care or follow up?Day 0 (baseline)
If follow up visit, is the wound aggravated, stable or improving?Day 0 (baseline)
Age of the target lesion in daysDay 0 (baseline)
Location of the target lesionDay 0 (baseline)Heel, internal malleolus or external malleolus

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026