Skip to content

Molecular Phenotyping in Predicting Response in Patients With Stage IB-III Esophageal Cancer Receiving Combination Chemotherapy

Pilot Study of Correlation Between Molecular Phenotype and Response to Two Independent Treatment Regimens, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel vs. 5-Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy in Patients With Localized Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02392377
Enrollment
1
Registered
2015-03-19
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2018-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stage IB Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIA Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIB Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIIA Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIIB Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIIC Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Brief summary

This randomized pilot phase II trial studies how well molecular phenotyping works in predicting response in patients with stage IB-III esophageal cancer who are receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel or oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil. Studying the genes in a patients tumor cells before and after chemotherapy may help in understanding if there are specific features of the tumor cells that make a person more or less likely to respond to treatment and how these features may be affected by treatment.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate gene and micro ribonucleic acid (miRNA) expression levels in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma prior to receiving chemotherapy and identify relative expression differences between patients responding and not responding to treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil (fluorouracil) and oxaliplatin as measured by fluorodeoxyglucose F-18 (\[18F\] FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the impact of treatment on expression patterns of both genes and miRNAs in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma following treatment with either carboplatin and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, and identify expression patterns associated with treatment response and resistance as assessed by (18F) FDG-PET. II. To evaluate the expression patterns of genes and miRNAs in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma prior to and following a full neoadjuvant combined-modality treatment program with either carboplatin and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin chemotherapy plus radiation, and identify relative expression differences between patients achieving a pathologic complete response and patients not achieving a pathologic complete response. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: INDUCTION: Patients receive carboplatin (IV) and paclitaxel intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle for two cycles (total of 6 weeks). CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) intravenously once weekly for five weeks throughout the duration of their radiation which is daily (Monday through Friday). This will be given in combination with radiation therapy to a total of 50.4Gy using 180cGy fractions. ARM II: INDUCTION: Patients receive mFOLFOX6 where they get oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and then 5FU at 2400 mg/m2 IV to be administered over a 46 hour period. This is repeated every 2 weeks for 3 cycles (total of 6 weeks). CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive chemoradiation with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 2 weeks for a total of 3 cycles (6 weeks) as well as 5FU 300 mg/m2/day over 96 hours via continuous infusion each week of radiation for a total of 6 weeks. This will be given in combination with radiation therapy to a total of 50.4Gy using 180cGy fractions. SURGERY: In both arms, approximately 4-10 weeks after completion of chemoradiation therapy, patients undergo esophagectomy at the discretion of the treating team. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then periodically thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGCarboplatin

Given IV or IVPB

DRUGOxaliplatin

Given IV

DRUGLeucovorin Calcium

Given IV

DRUGFluorouracil

Given IV

RADIATIONRadiation Therapy

Undergo radiation therapy

DRUGPaclitaxel

Given IV or IVPB

PROCEDURETherapeutic Conventional Surgery

Undergo esophagectomy

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed localized (T1N1-3M0 or T2-4NanyM0, stage IB-III) Siewert type 1 or type 2 esophageal adenocarcinoma that is amenable to surgical resection as determined by a thoracic surgeon and for which all disease (primary tumor and involved lymph nodes) can be treated with radiation, as determined by a radiation oncologist * Patients may not have received any prior chemotherapy, biologic therapy or radiation therapy for management of their disease; chemotherapy or biologic therapy administered for treatment of another primary malignancy are permitted if treatment was greater than 5 years ago * Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =\< 2 * Patients must have a life expectancy of \> 3 months, in the opinion of and as documented by the investigator * Hemoglobin \>= 10.0 g/dl * Absolute neutrophil count \>= 1,500/mcL * Platelet count \>= 100,000/mcL * Total bilirubin within normal institutional limits * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\]) =\< 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase \[SGPT\]) =\< 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal * Serum creatinine within normal institutional limits OR creatinine clearance \>= 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal (as calculated by Cockcroft-Gault) * Patients must have an avid primary tumor with an standardized uptake value (SUV) of \>= 5 on baseline (18F) FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging * Men must agree to use adequate contraception (double barrier method of birth control or abstinence) 1 week prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation and for 1 month after completing combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation; should a male patient's female partner become pregnant or suspect that she is pregnant while her partner is participating in this study, the treating physician should be informed immediately * Patients must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document * This study will be limited to enrollment of Caucasian males only

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are receiving any chemotherapy, biologic therapy, radiation therapy or any investigational agent * Patients with metastatic disease * Patients with a history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to platinums, taxanes or fluoropyrimidines * Patients who have previously received radiation therapy to the chest or abdomen such that there would be overlap between the previous and current radiation field * Patients with uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) whom are not receiving antiretroviral therapy * Patients with another malignancy within the past 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Expression Differences in Individual Genes and Gene Profiles Between Patients Responding and Not Responding to Treatment, as Assessed by (18F) FDG-PETBaselineBaseline gene profiles will be compared for 10 (18F) FDG-PET responders vs. 15 (18F) FDG-PET non-responders per treatment regimen using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating the false discovery rate (FDR) p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top genes identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models.
Relative Expression Differences in Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles Between Patients Responding and Not Responding to Treatment, Assessed by (18F) FDG-PETBaselineBaseline microRNA profiles will be compared for 10 (18F) FDG-PET responders vs. 15 (18F) FDG-PET non-responders per treatment regimen using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating the FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top microRNAs identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models.
Biological Pathway Perturbation Upon Exposure to ChemotherapyUp to 6 weeksPredefined signatures of biological pathway activities will be evaluated in order to identify pathway perturbation upon exposure to chemotherapy. Significant pathway modulations upon brief exposure will then be evaluated for association with clinical response using non-parametric tests such as the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In all cases, statistical correction to account for multiple hypothesis testing will be employed and pathways with a false discovery rate of 10% or lower will be considered as significant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Expression Differences in Baseline Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following TreatmentBaselineBaseline microRNA profiles for 8 pathologic complete responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen using a t-test will be compared. Top microRNAs will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Gene Expression Levels/Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following TreatmentBaseline to post-induction (36-43 days)Changes in baseline and post-treatment gene expression level/profiles will be compared between 8 pathologic responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen, filtering for expression levels changes of 0.20 and above. Differences in expression level changes per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test. Top genes will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Chemotherapy Specimens of Individual Genes and Gene Expression ProfilesBaseline to post-induction (36-43 days)Changes in baseline and post-treatment gene expression levels will be calculated between (18F) FDG-PET responders and non-responders, filtering for expression level changes of \>= 0.20. Differences in expression level change per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top genes identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict responsiveness or resistance to each individual treatment regimen.
Occurrence of Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity Per the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0Up to 30 days after the end of treatmentToxicities will be summarized as the percentage of patients experiencing each type and grade of event according to treatment group. Patients who receive at least one dose of treatment will be included in the analysis.
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction microRNA Levels/Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following TreatmentBaseline to post-induction (36-43 days)Changes in baseline and post-treatment microRNA level/profiles will be compared between 8 pathologic responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen, filtering for expression levels changes of 0.20 and above. Differences in expression level changes per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test. Top microRNAs will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Chemotherapy Specimens of Individual microRNAs and microRNA ProfilesBaseline to post-induction (36-43 days)Changes in baseline and post-treatment microRNA levels will be calculated between (18F) FDG-PET responders and non-responders, filtering for expression level changes of \>= 0.20. Differences in expression level change per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top microRNAs identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict responsiveness or resistance to each individual treatment regimen.
Relative Expression Differences in Baseline Individual Genes and Gene Expression Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following TreatmentBaselineBaseline gene expression profiles for 8 pathologic complete responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen using a t-test will be compared. Top genes will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Radiation Therapy, Surgery)
INDUCTION: Patients receive chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Patients receive carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day treatment cycle for two cycles (total of 6 weeks). CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) intravenously once weekly for five weeks throughout the duration of their radiation which is daily (Monday through Friday). SURGERY: Approximately 4-10 weeks after completion of chemoradiation therapy, patients undergo esophagectomy at the discretion of the treating team.
0
Arm II (Combination Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, Surgery)
INDUCTION: Patients receive mFOLFOX6 where they get oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and then 5FU at 2400 mg/m2 IV to be administered over a 46 hour period. This is repeated every 2 weeks for 3 cycles (total of 6 weeks). CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 2 weeks for a total of 3 cycles (6 weeks) as well as 5FU 300 mg/m2/day over 96 hours via continuous infusion each week of radiation for a total of 6 weeks. SURGERY: Approximately 4-10 weeks after completion of chemoradiation therapy, patients undergo esophagectomy at the discretion of the treating team.
1
Total1

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Radiation Therapy, Surgery)Arm II (Combination Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, Surgery)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Biological Pathway Perturbation Upon Exposure to Chemotherapy

Predefined signatures of biological pathway activities will be evaluated in order to identify pathway perturbation upon exposure to chemotherapy. Significant pathway modulations upon brief exposure will then be evaluated for association with clinical response using non-parametric tests such as the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In all cases, statistical correction to account for multiple hypothesis testing will be employed and pathways with a false discovery rate of 10% or lower will be considered as significant.

Time frame: Up to 6 weeks

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Primary

Relative Expression Differences in Individual Genes and Gene Profiles Between Patients Responding and Not Responding to Treatment, as Assessed by (18F) FDG-PET

Baseline gene profiles will be compared for 10 (18F) FDG-PET responders vs. 15 (18F) FDG-PET non-responders per treatment regimen using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating the false discovery rate (FDR) p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top genes identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Primary

Relative Expression Differences in Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles Between Patients Responding and Not Responding to Treatment, Assessed by (18F) FDG-PET

Baseline microRNA profiles will be compared for 10 (18F) FDG-PET responders vs. 15 (18F) FDG-PET non-responders per treatment regimen using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating the FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top microRNAs identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Secondary

Occurrence of Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity Per the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0

Toxicities will be summarized as the percentage of patients experiencing each type and grade of event according to treatment group. Patients who receive at least one dose of treatment will be included in the analysis.

Time frame: Up to 30 days after the end of treatment

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Secondary

Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Chemotherapy Specimens of Individual Genes and Gene Expression Profiles

Changes in baseline and post-treatment gene expression levels will be calculated between (18F) FDG-PET responders and non-responders, filtering for expression level changes of \>= 0.20. Differences in expression level change per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top genes identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict responsiveness or resistance to each individual treatment regimen.

Time frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Secondary

Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Chemotherapy Specimens of Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles

Changes in baseline and post-treatment microRNA levels will be calculated between (18F) FDG-PET responders and non-responders, filtering for expression level changes of \>= 0.20. Differences in expression level change per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value \< 0.05). Top microRNAs identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict responsiveness or resistance to each individual treatment regimen.

Time frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Secondary

Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Gene Expression Levels/Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment

Changes in baseline and post-treatment gene expression level/profiles will be compared between 8 pathologic responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen, filtering for expression levels changes of 0.20 and above. Differences in expression level changes per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test. Top genes will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.

Time frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Secondary

Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction microRNA Levels/Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment

Changes in baseline and post-treatment microRNA level/profiles will be compared between 8 pathologic responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen, filtering for expression levels changes of 0.20 and above. Differences in expression level changes per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test. Top microRNAs will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.

Time frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Secondary

Relative Expression Differences in Baseline Individual Genes and Gene Expression Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment

Baseline gene expression profiles for 8 pathologic complete responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen using a t-test will be compared. Top genes will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Secondary

Relative Expression Differences in Baseline Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment

Baseline microRNA profiles for 8 pathologic complete responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen using a t-test will be compared. Top microRNAs will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: No patients completed study and no patients were enrolled on the comparison group arm. No analysis could be completed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026