Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation, Quality of life, Left ventricular ejection fraction, Diastolic function, Echocardiography, Beta-blockers, Digoxin
Brief summary
Atrial fibrillation is a common heart rhythm disturbance, causing important discomfort for patients, a high risk of stroke, frequent hospital admissions and a two-fold increase in death. The number of patients with this condition are expected to double in the next 20 years. Medications to control heart-rate are used in the majority of patients, although the choice of agent is often guided by local preference rather than evidence from controlled trials. Despite the fact that patients with atrial fibrillation have high rates of other cardiac conditions such as heart failure, clinicians have insufficient evidence to personalise the use of different therapies. This feasibility study will allow us to develop a range of methods that can characterise patients according to the pumping and relaxing function of the heart, the burden of symptoms and to identify new blood markers. In this way, the investigators hope to improve clinical practice guidelines, allowing doctors to prescribe appropriate treatments for the right patients. The research will be focused around a randomised trial of two medication strategies, providing much-needed data on the comparison of digoxin and beta-blockers (two commonly-used drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation). It will also allow us to identify the best way to record patient-reported quality of life and develop robust techniques to determine heart function using non-invasive imaging, facilitating the conduct of a large-scale clinical trial. The key objectives of the research programme are to define the optimal medications for patients with atrial fibrillation and identify the most valid, reproducible and cost-effective methods to examine patients. The ultimate aim of the project is to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation, benefiting patients, the National Health Service and the global community.
Detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common cardiac condition that leads to a substantial burden on quality-of-life (QoL), an increased risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and death, and significant healthcare costs for the NHS. In addition to anti-coagulation and considerations for rhythm control therapy, most patients with AF are in need of pharmacological control of heart rate. This aspect of care has not received stringent investigation, with treatment guidelines based on small crossover studies and observational data rather than robust controlled trials. Beta-blocker monotherapy remains the first-line option in the current NICE AF guidelines consultation document, with digoxin only for sedentary patients, although this recommendation is based on 'very low-quality evidence'. The benefit of different rate-control therapies on symptoms and other intermediate outcomes (such as left-ventricular ejection fraction \[LVEF\] and diastolic function) are unknown, as are their effects on clinical events such as hospitalisation. This situation is unacceptable in light of the potential benefits and risk of different rate-control options in AF. It also limits our ability to personalise treatment according to patient characteristics. The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial is informed by a number of in-depth systematic reviews of management and clinical outcomes in AF patients. Taken together, this information provides a sound basis to plan a major randomised controlled trial (RCT). However as trials of rate-control in AF have typically been small or uncontrolled, further information is needed before designing a trial that can assess clinical outcomes. The RATE-AF trial will allow us to define appropriate primary and secondary outcome measures and their standard deviation in a contemporary population of patients with permanent AF. This information will allow us to estimate sample size, determination of recruitment, retention and adherence policies, and to ascertain the best methods of obtaining adverse event data and reliable economic costs for a larger trial assessing cardiovascular outcomes and hospitalization. The RATE-AF trial will also be the largest RCT of its kind, allowing us to compare the effect of beta-blockers and digoxin on QoL as initial rate-control therapy in patients with permanent AF. The long-term aim of the research is to answer key questions about how to initiate therapy, stratified by relevant patient characteristics such as systolic and diastolic cardiac function, baseline symptoms and concurrent medication. The research will also define the patho-physiological mechanisms underlying AF-related symptoms, left-ventricular function and their association with adverse clinical outcomes, and to identify clinical markers for the response to different rate control therapy.
Interventions
Drug intervention
Drug intervention
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Adult patients aged 60 years or older, able to provide informed written consent 2. Permanent AF, characterised (at time of randomisation) as a physician decision for rate-control with no plans for cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic medication, or ablation therapy 3. Symptoms of breathlessness (New York Heart Association Class II or more) 4. Able to provide written, informed consent
Exclusion criteria
1. Established indication for beta-blocker therapy, e.g. survived myocardial infarction in the last 6 months 2. Known contraindications for therapy with beta-blockers or digoxin, e.g. a history of severe bronchospasm that would preclude use of beta-blockers, or known intolerance to these medications 3. Baseline heart rate \<60 bpm 4. Known intolerance of beta-blockers or digoxin 5. A history of severe bronchospasm (e.g. due to asthma) that would preclude use of beta-blockers 6. Baseline heart rate \<60 bpm 7. History of second or third-degree heart block 8. Supraventricular arrhythmias associated with accessory conducting pathways (e.g. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) or a history of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation 9. Planned pacemaker implantation, pacemaker-dependent rhythm or history of atrioventricular node ablation 10. Decompensated heart failure (evidenced by need for intravenous inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 14 days prior to randomisation 11. A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis 12. Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation 13. Initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (with/without defibrillator) within 6 months prior to randomisation 14. Intravenous infusions for heart failure (inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 7 days prior to randomisation 15. A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis 16. Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation 17. Receiving renal replacement therapy 18. Major surgery, including thoracic or cardiac surgery, within 3 months of randomisation 19. Severe, concomitant non-cardiovascular disease (including malignancy) that is expected to reduce life expectancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Reported Quality of Life (SF-36) | Primary outcome at 6 months timepoint. | Patient-reported outcomes as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire physical component score. The physical component score ranges from 0-100 where higher value indicates better outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction | 12 months | The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices |
| Diastolic Function- Measured by the E/e'. | 12 months | The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices. E/e' - the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity. |
| B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months. | 6 months | B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 6 months. |
| Composite Functional Status Measures- 6 Minute Walking Distance at 12 Months. | 12 months | Composite functional status measures- 6 minute walking distance at 12 months. |
| Patient Reported Outcomes- (AFEQT) at 12 Months. | 12 months | As assessed using the AFEQT overall score at 12 months. The range for AFEQT overall score is from 0= complete disability to 100=no disability. |
| Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | 12 months | As assessed using the SF-36 version 2 global and specific scores at 12 months. All domains presented are between 0 to 100 scale where the higher score indicates better outcomes. |
| Patient Reported Outcomes (EQ-5D-5L) | 12 months | As assessed using the EQ-5D-5L summary index questionnaires at both 6 and 12 months. The range for summary index is from -0.594=worst score to 1=best score |
| Ambulatory Heart-rate. | Within 12 months | 24 hour ambulatory heart-rate. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular Events | 12 months | Number of Participants with hospital admissions for cardiovascular events. |
| Drug Discontinuation Rate | 12 months | the number and extent to which patients discontinue trial drugs |
| Drug Discontinuation Rate Within 12 Months. | 12 months | Number of participants requiring drug discontinuation due to adverse reactions. |
| Hospital Admission Rate | 12 months | A composite of adverse clinical events |
| Retention of Participants | 12 months | Convenience, compliance and cross-over data |
| Preferred Outcome Measures for This Cohort of Patients | 12 months | Establish which are the best measures for these patients |
| Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions. | 12 months | SF-36 physical function score at 6 and 12 months |
| Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospital Admissions. | During the 12 month follow-up period. | Number of Participants with Unplanned Hospital Admissions. |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The trial opened for recruitment in December 2016 and the first participant was randomised on the 20th December 2016 and the last participant was randomised on the 1st October 2018. A total of 161 participants were randomised into the trial with 1 centre recruiting patients into the trial.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 390 were screened for the trial, of these screened 161 were randomised.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Beta-blocker In Group B, oral bisoprolol will be commenced at either 1.25mg, 2.5mg or 5mg according to the treatment schedule and uptitrated, as required, to 15mg daily. Recommended additional therapy in this arm includes diltiazem. Use of digoxin is explicitly discouraged but will not terminate participation in the study. If intolerance to bisoprolol occurs, investigators will be advised to try an alternate beta-blocker of their choosing (typically carvedilol, nebivolol, or metoprolol) at equivalent dosage.
Bisoprolol: Drug intervention | 80 |
| Digoxin In Group A, the maintenance dose of oral digoxin will be either 62.5mcg or 125mcg according to the pre-defined treatment schedule and uptitrated, as required, to 250mcg daily. A single loading dose of four tablets (250 or 500mcg according to target maintenance dose) will be prescribed in digoxin-naïve participants, where necessary. Recommended additional therapy in this arm includes the calcium-channel blocker diltiazem. Use of beta-blockers is explicitly discouraged but will not terminate participation in the study.
Digoxin: Drug intervention | 81 |
| Total | 161 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Months Follow-up | Death | 2 | 0 |
| 12 Months Follow-up | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 2 |
| 12 Months Follow-up | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 |
| 6 Months Follow-up | Death | 5 | 4 |
| 6 Months Follow-up | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Digoxin | Beta-blocker |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12-Lead ECG Heart Rate | 99.7 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 18 | 100.3 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8 | 99.2 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2 |
| Age, Continuous | 75.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 | 74.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 76.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 |
| Any previous cardioversions No | 145 Participants | 74 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Any previous cardioversions Yes | 16 Participants | 7 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Any signs of heart failure at baseline No | 77 Participants | 32 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Any signs of heart failure at baseline Yes | 84 Participants | 49 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Apex beat heart rate | 98.7 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9 | 98.3 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1 | 99 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8 |
| Baseline NTproBNP | 1057 pg/mL | 1091 pg/mL | 1040.5 pg/mL |
| Creatinine | 89.6 Micromol/l STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1 | 87.9 Micromol/l STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.1 | 91.4 Micromol/l STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1 |
| EHRA class EHRA Class 1 | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| EHRA class EHRA Class 2a | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| EHRA class EHRA Class 2b | 75 Participants | 35 Participants | 40 Participants |
| EHRA class EHRA Class 3 | 65 Participants | 38 Participants | 27 Participants |
| EHRA class EHRA Class 4 | 15 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Estimated ejection fraction | 56.9 Percentage of ejection fraction STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | 56.2 Percentage of ejection fraction STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 | 57.6 Percentage of ejection fraction STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 |
| NYHA class Class I | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| NYHA class Class II | 100 Participants | 47 Participants | 53 Participants |
| NYHA class Class III | 56 Participants | 32 Participants | 24 Participants |
| NYHA class Class IV | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| On anticoagulant before randomisation No | 26 Participants | 9 Participants | 17 Participants |
| On anticoagulant before randomisation Yes | 135 Participants | 72 Participants | 63 Participants |
| Previous diagnosis of heart failure? No | 102 Participants | 46 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Previous diagnosis of heart failure? Yes | 59 Participants | 35 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Previous history of anti-arrhythmic drugs No | 147 Participants | 75 Participants | 72 Participants |
| Previous history of anti-arrhythmic drugs Yes | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Previously undergone AF ablation No | 158 Participants | 79 Participants | 79 Participants |
| Previously undergone AF ablation Yes | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Self declared ethnicity Asian / Asian British - Indian | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Self declared ethnicity Asian / Asian British - Pakistani | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Self declared ethnicity Black / African / Caribbean / Black British- African | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Self declared ethnicity Black / African / Caribbean / Black British - Caribbean | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Self declared ethnicity White - English / Welsh / Scottish / Northern Iris | 138 Participants | 72 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Self declared ethnicity White-Irish | 12 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Radial artery heart rate | 87.4 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 | 87.8 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 | 86.9 bpm STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 161 participants | 81 participants | 80 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 74 Participants | 36 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 87 Participants | 45 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Systolic BP | 135.8 mmHg STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 | 134.5 mmHg STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 | 137.1 mmHg STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5 |
| Type I diabetes No | 161 Participants | 81 Participants | 80 Participants |
| Type I diabetes Yes | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Type II diabetes No | 123 Participants | 65 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Type II diabetes Yes | 38 Participants | 16 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Unplanned admission for AF or HF in last 12 months No | 130 Participants | 65 Participants | 65 Participants |
| Unplanned admission for AF or HF in last 12 months Yes | 31 Participants | 16 Participants | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 7 / 80 | 4 / 81 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 51 / 80 | 20 / 81 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 21 / 80 | 13 / 81 |
Outcome results
Patient Reported Quality of Life (SF-36)
Patient-reported outcomes as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire physical component score. The physical component score ranges from 0-100 where higher value indicates better outcome.
Time frame: Primary outcome at 6 months timepoint.
Population: ITT Analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Quality of Life (SF-36) | 29.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Quality of Life (SF-36) | 31.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
Ambulatory Heart-rate.
24 hour ambulatory heart-rate.
Time frame: Within 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Ambulatory Heart-rate. | 73.7 bpm | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Digoxin | Ambulatory Heart-rate. | 78.9 bpm | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months.
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months. | 1209 ng/L |
| Digoxin | B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months. | 1057.5 ng/L |
Composite Functional Status Measures- 6 Minute Walking Distance at 12 Months.
Composite functional status measures- 6 minute walking distance at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Composite Functional Status Measures- 6 Minute Walking Distance at 12 Months. | 329 metres |
| Digoxin | Composite Functional Status Measures- 6 Minute Walking Distance at 12 Months. | 366 metres |
Diastolic Function- Measured by the E/e'.
The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices. E/e' - the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Diastolic Function- Measured by the E/e'. | 10.8 Ratio of E/e' | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Digoxin | Diastolic Function- Measured by the E/e'. | 10.8 Ratio of E/e' | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction | 59.8 percentage of ejection fraction | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Digoxin | Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction | 59.7 percentage of ejection fraction | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
Patient Reported Outcomes- (AFEQT) at 12 Months.
As assessed using the AFEQT overall score at 12 months. The range for AFEQT overall score is from 0= complete disability to 100=no disability.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes- (AFEQT) at 12 Months. | 68.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes- (AFEQT) at 12 Months. | 75.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
Patient Reported Outcomes (EQ-5D-5L)
As assessed using the EQ-5D-5L summary index questionnaires at both 6 and 12 months. The range for summary index is from -0.594=worst score to 1=best score
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (EQ-5D-5L) | 0.62 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (EQ-5D-5L) | 0.66 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months.
As assessed using the SF-36 version 2 global and specific scores at 12 months. All domains presented are between 0 to 100 scale where the higher score indicates better outcomes.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Some domains of the SFF36 version 2 were not possible to be computed due to missing data in the questionnaire.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | General Health Perception Domain Score | 39.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Physical Function Domain Score | 27.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Pain Score | 41.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.5 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Role Limitation Due to Physical Domain score | 32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Social Functioning Domain Score | 43.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.6 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Physical Component Summary | 29.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Mental Health Domain | 51.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems Domain score | 40.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Energy/Vitality Domain Score | 42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Beta-blocker | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Mental Component Summary | 51.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Energy/Vitality Domain Score | 47.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems Domain score | 45.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Pain Score | 40.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | General Health Perception Domain Score | 42.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Physical Component Summary | 32.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Mental Component Summary | 53.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Physical Function Domain Score | 31.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Social Functioning Domain Score | 45.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Mental Health Domain | 51.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Digoxin | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | Role Limitation Due to Physical Domain score | 37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
Cardiovascular Events
Number of Participants with hospital admissions for cardiovascular events.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Cardiovascular Events | 12 Participants |
| Digoxin | Cardiovascular Events | 2 Participants |
Drug Discontinuation Rate
the number and extent to which patients discontinue trial drugs
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Drug Discontinuation Rate | Adherent | 65 Participants |
| Beta-blocker | Drug Discontinuation Rate | Non-Adherent | 3 Participants |
| Beta-blocker | Drug Discontinuation Rate | Missing | 4 Participants |
| Digoxin | Drug Discontinuation Rate | Adherent | 70 Participants |
| Digoxin | Drug Discontinuation Rate | Non-Adherent | 3 Participants |
| Digoxin | Drug Discontinuation Rate | Missing | 0 Participants |
Drug Discontinuation Rate Within 12 Months.
Number of participants requiring drug discontinuation due to adverse reactions.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Drug Discontinuation Rate Within 12 Months. | 9 Participants |
| Digoxin | Drug Discontinuation Rate Within 12 Months. | 2 Participants |
Hospital Admission Rate
A composite of adverse clinical events
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Hospital Admission Rate | 19 Participants |
| Digoxin | Hospital Admission Rate | 11 Participants |
Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospital Admissions.
Number of Participants with Unplanned Hospital Admissions.
Time frame: During the 12 month follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospital Admissions. | 19 Participants |
| Digoxin | Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospital Admissions. | 11 Participants |
Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.
SF-36 overall score at 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.
AFEQT overall score at 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.
LVEF and E/e scores at 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.
SF-36 physical function score at 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Preferred Outcome Measures for This Cohort of Patients
Establish which are the best measures for these patients
Time frame: 12 months
Retention of Participants
Convenience, compliance and cross-over data
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-blocker | Retention of Participants | Death | yes | 7 Participants |
| Beta-blocker | Retention of Participants | Death | No | 73 Participants |
| Beta-blocker | Retention of Participants | Lost to follow-up | yes | 0 Participants |
| Beta-blocker | Retention of Participants | Lost to follow-up | No | 80 Participants |
| Beta-blocker | Retention of Participants | Withdrawn consent | yes | 1 Participants |
| Beta-blocker | Retention of Participants | Withdrawn consent | No | 79 Participants |
| Digoxin | Retention of Participants | Withdrawn consent | yes | 2 Participants |
| Digoxin | Retention of Participants | Death | yes | 4 Participants |
| Digoxin | Retention of Participants | Lost to follow-up | No | 79 Participants |
| Digoxin | Retention of Participants | Death | No | 77 Participants |
| Digoxin | Retention of Participants | Withdrawn consent | No | 79 Participants |
| Digoxin | Retention of Participants | Lost to follow-up | yes | 2 Participants |