Skip to content

Effect of Sugammadex for Muscle Motor Response and Awareness in Intraoperative Wakeup

Effect of Sugammadex in Wakeup Procedure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02390817
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-03-18
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2018-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Curvatures

Brief summary

The study will be performed to evaluate motor response and awareness with using sugammadex during wakeup procedure in spine surgery. The investigator's goal is to investigate the effect of sugammadex on the state of consciousness and motor-somatosensorial evoked potentials.

Detailed description

Between 10-25 age, American Society of Anesthesiologist clinical status(ASA) I-II, 60 patient which will be performed spine surgery in orthopedics clinic will be enrolled in this study. Patient will be randomized into two group that include 20 patient. General anesthesia will be administered by Totally intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanyl for all patients. Two groups will be monitored with BIS (bispectral index), TOF (train-of-for) MEP (motor evoked potential) and SSEP (somatosensorial potential). During wakeup procedure, in group S, TIVA will be stopped and 2 mg/kg of sugammadex will be given intravenously. BIS, TOF, MEP, SSEP will be measured. In group N, TIVA will be stopped and 0.04 mg/kg of neostigmine will be given. Also BIS, TOF, MEP, SSEP will be measured. Sugammadex will be given group S and Neostigmine will be given group N at the end of the operation. At postoperative sixth hour, the investigators will visit all the patients and ask standard questions about intraoperative wakeup procedure.

Interventions

DRUGSugammadex

Administration of Sugammadex

DRUGNeostigmine

Administration of Neostigmine

Sponsors

Private Ortopedia Hospital, Seyhan Adana
CollaboratorOTHER
Cukurova University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II patients * spine surgery * 10-25 age

Exclusion criteria

* ASA III and above * Patient refusal * neuromuscular disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to consciousness30 mintime to obeying verbal commands after reversal of NMBAs

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess Motor Evoked Potential values4 hoursMotor Evoked Potential (MEP)
To assess Somatosensorial Evoked Potential values4 hoursSomatosensorial Evoked Potential (SSEP)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026