Epistaxis, Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia, HHT, Nasal Bleeding, Nose Bleeds
Conditions
Keywords
HHT, Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia, epistaxis, nose bleeds, nasal bleeding, Avastin, bevacizumab
Brief summary
This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intranasal Avastin (bevacizumab) injection versus saline control for control of HHT-related epistaxis when used in conjunction with bipolar electrocautery.
Detailed description
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by systemic vascular malformations that result from mutations of the ENG gene, which encodes for factors in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. HHT is diagnosed by the Curacao Criteria including the presence of epistaxis; telangiectasias or vascular malformations in the lungs, liver, or nervous system; and a positive family history involving a first-degree relative. One of the most common presentations of this disease is recurrent and profound epistaxis, with many patients reporting more than 4 epistaxis episodes in a day, many lasting up to an hour. HHT-related epistaxis often results in severe anemia requiring intravenous iron and repeated blood transfusions, and also carries significant psychosocial disability relating to impaired quality of life and work absenteeism. Multiple approaches to treatment have been described, including electrocautery, laser treatment, embolization, septodermoplasty, and as a last resort, Young's procedure, involving closure of the nasal vestibule. These approaches are largely palliative, with variable effectiveness, and almost always require repeated procedures for chronic management of bleeding. There is a great need for the development of new treatment options for reducing the medical morbidity and quality of life impairment associated with refractory epistaxis in HHT. Recently there has been promising data suggesting that inhibition of angiogenesis may be an effective strategy for managing HHT-related bleeding. Circulating concentrations of VEGF are significantly elevated in HHT, making VEGF an attractive therapeutic target. Preliminary studies suggest that bevacizumab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody that inhibits the biologic activity of VEGF, can significantly improve epistaxis severity when topically applied, locally injected, or intravenously administered. However, these early pilot studies of bevacizumab have been limited exclusively to retrospective case series. As yet, there has been no prospective double-blind placebo controlled trial with serial follow up time points to establish the role of bevacizumab in the treatment of HHT-related epistaxis. Based on existing level 4 evidence that suggests that bevacizumab injection is beneficial in the management of HHT-related epistaxis, we hypothesize that patients who receive intranasal injection with bevacizumab at the time of electrocautery treatment will have an improvement in the frequency and severity of epistaxis compared to patients who receive injection of saline control.
Interventions
Bevacizumab will be mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy to a total dose of 100mg in 4mL, and 50mg (2mL) will be injected into each side of the nose
4mL of saline will be mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy as a control
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. The patient carries a diagnosis of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) 2. The patient is to undergo treatment with electrocautery in the operating room under endoscopic visualization 3. The patient is able to give informed consent 4. The patient is at least 18 years old
Exclusion criteria
1. The patient has had prior treatment with systemic or nasal bevacizumab within the past year 2. The patient has undergone electrocautery for epistaxis within the 6 months prior to study enrollment 3. The patient is a minor 4. The patient is pregnant 5. The patient is incapable of understanding the consent process 6. The patient has a history of HIV or another known cause of immunosuppression, or is actively taking immunosuppressive medications due to organ transplantation, rheumatoid disease, or other medical conditions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6 | ESS is a standardized and reproducible outcome measure for the control of epistaxis. It is composed of six factors that are independent predictors of self-described epistaxis severity. The range is 0 to 13. The higher the score worse is epistaxis severity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6 | PCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. PCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. |
| Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6 | MCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. MCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. |
| Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect) | Baseline, Month 2, Month 6 | Evaluate the effect of bevacizumab injection on direct and indirect costs in USD associated with care and management of epistaxis as well as productivity lost after treatment. The cost of caring in USD for nasal bleeding was evaluated with two surveys, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, and the HHT Costing Data Sheet. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Bevacizumab Bevacizumab mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy to a total dose of 100mg in 4mL, and 50mg (2mL), injected into each side of the nose | 19 |
| Saline Control Placebo (4mL of saline) mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy as a control. | 20 |
| Total | 39 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Bevacizumab | Saline Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49.37 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 | 55.35 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.75 | 52.44 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.82 |
| Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | 5.83 units on a scale | 5.06 units on a scale | 5.35 units on a scale |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 15 Participants | 18 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 19 Participants | 20 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 10 Participants | 21 Participants |
| SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | 51.38 units on a scale | 50.53 units on a scale | 51.25 units on a scale |
| SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | 33.92 units on a scale | 38.32 units on a scale | 36.48 units on a scale |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Outcome results
Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)
ESS is a standardized and reproducible outcome measure for the control of epistaxis. It is composed of six factors that are independent predictors of self-described epistaxis severity. The range is 0 to 13. The higher the score worse is epistaxis severity.
Time frame: Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6
Population: Participants with available data were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 1 month | -2.27 score on a scale |
| Bevacizumab | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 2 month | -2.27 score on a scale |
| Bevacizumab | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 4 month | -2.00 score on a scale |
| Bevacizumab | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 6 month | -1.34 score on a scale |
| Saline Control | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 6 month | -0.87 score on a scale |
| Saline Control | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 1 month | -1.16 score on a scale |
| Saline Control | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 4 month | -1.16 score on a scale |
| Saline Control | Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) | Difference at 2 month | -1.01 score on a scale |
Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)
Evaluate the effect of bevacizumab injection on direct and indirect costs in USD associated with care and management of epistaxis as well as productivity lost after treatment. The cost of caring in USD for nasal bleeding was evaluated with two surveys, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, and the HHT Costing Data Sheet.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6
Population: Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect) | Baseline | 74 US Dollars |
| Bevacizumab | Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect) | Month 2 | 9 US Dollars |
| Bevacizumab | Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect) | Month 6 | 11 US Dollars |
| Saline Control | Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect) | Baseline | 16 US Dollars |
| Saline Control | Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect) | Month 2 | 11 US Dollars |
| Saline Control | Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect) | Month 6 | 0 US Dollars |
Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score
MCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. MCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Time frame: Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6
Population: Participants with available data were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 1 month | 51.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.91 |
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 2 month | 54.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.99 |
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 4 month | 51.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.61 |
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 6 month | 48.39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.97 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 6 month | 55.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.03 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 1 month | 54.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.89 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 4 month | 53.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.84 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Mean at 2 month | 50.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.68 |
Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
PCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. PCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Time frame: Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6
Population: Participants with available data were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 1 | 40.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.78 |
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 2 | 39.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.22 |
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 4 | 39.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Bevacizumab | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 6 | 39.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.86 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 6 | 38.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.73 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 1 | 40.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.79 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 4 | 40.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.47 |
| Saline Control | Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Month 2 | 40.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |