Skip to content

Intranasal Bevacizumab for HHT-Related Epistaxis

Intranasal Bevacizumab for HHT-Related Epistaxis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02389959
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-03-17
Start date
2014-08-04
Completion date
2020-01-23
Last updated
2021-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epistaxis, Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia, HHT, Nasal Bleeding, Nose Bleeds

Keywords

HHT, Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia, epistaxis, nose bleeds, nasal bleeding, Avastin, bevacizumab

Brief summary

This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intranasal Avastin (bevacizumab) injection versus saline control for control of HHT-related epistaxis when used in conjunction with bipolar electrocautery.

Detailed description

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by systemic vascular malformations that result from mutations of the ENG gene, which encodes for factors in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. HHT is diagnosed by the Curacao Criteria including the presence of epistaxis; telangiectasias or vascular malformations in the lungs, liver, or nervous system; and a positive family history involving a first-degree relative. One of the most common presentations of this disease is recurrent and profound epistaxis, with many patients reporting more than 4 epistaxis episodes in a day, many lasting up to an hour. HHT-related epistaxis often results in severe anemia requiring intravenous iron and repeated blood transfusions, and also carries significant psychosocial disability relating to impaired quality of life and work absenteeism. Multiple approaches to treatment have been described, including electrocautery, laser treatment, embolization, septodermoplasty, and as a last resort, Young's procedure, involving closure of the nasal vestibule. These approaches are largely palliative, with variable effectiveness, and almost always require repeated procedures for chronic management of bleeding. There is a great need for the development of new treatment options for reducing the medical morbidity and quality of life impairment associated with refractory epistaxis in HHT. Recently there has been promising data suggesting that inhibition of angiogenesis may be an effective strategy for managing HHT-related bleeding. Circulating concentrations of VEGF are significantly elevated in HHT, making VEGF an attractive therapeutic target. Preliminary studies suggest that bevacizumab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody that inhibits the biologic activity of VEGF, can significantly improve epistaxis severity when topically applied, locally injected, or intravenously administered. However, these early pilot studies of bevacizumab have been limited exclusively to retrospective case series. As yet, there has been no prospective double-blind placebo controlled trial with serial follow up time points to establish the role of bevacizumab in the treatment of HHT-related epistaxis. Based on existing level 4 evidence that suggests that bevacizumab injection is beneficial in the management of HHT-related epistaxis, we hypothesize that patients who receive intranasal injection with bevacizumab at the time of electrocautery treatment will have an improvement in the frequency and severity of epistaxis compared to patients who receive injection of saline control.

Interventions

DRUGBevacizumab

Bevacizumab will be mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy to a total dose of 100mg in 4mL, and 50mg (2mL) will be injected into each side of the nose

DRUGPlacebo (Saline)

4mL of saline will be mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy as a control

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The patient carries a diagnosis of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) 2. The patient is to undergo treatment with electrocautery in the operating room under endoscopic visualization 3. The patient is able to give informed consent 4. The patient is at least 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

1. The patient has had prior treatment with systemic or nasal bevacizumab within the past year 2. The patient has undergone electrocautery for epistaxis within the 6 months prior to study enrollment 3. The patient is a minor 4. The patient is pregnant 5. The patient is incapable of understanding the consent process 6. The patient has a history of HIV or another known cause of immunosuppression, or is actively taking immunosuppressive medications due to organ transplantation, rheumatoid disease, or other medical conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6ESS is a standardized and reproducible outcome measure for the control of epistaxis. It is composed of six factors that are independent predictors of self-described epistaxis severity. The range is 0 to 13. The higher the score worse is epistaxis severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreBaseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6PCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. PCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreBaseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6MCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. MCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)Baseline, Month 2, Month 6Evaluate the effect of bevacizumab injection on direct and indirect costs in USD associated with care and management of epistaxis as well as productivity lost after treatment. The cost of caring in USD for nasal bleeding was evaluated with two surveys, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, and the HHT Costing Data Sheet.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy to a total dose of 100mg in 4mL, and 50mg (2mL), injected into each side of the nose
19
Saline Control
Placebo (4mL of saline) mixed by the Stanford Hospital Pharmacy as a control.
20
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBevacizumabSaline ControlTotal
Age, Continuous49.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
55.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.75
52.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.82
Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)5.83 units on a scale5.06 units on a scale5.35 units on a scale
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 Participants20 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score51.38 units on a scale50.53 units on a scale51.25 units on a scale
SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score33.92 units on a scale38.32 units on a scale36.48 units on a scale

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)

ESS is a standardized and reproducible outcome measure for the control of epistaxis. It is composed of six factors that are independent predictors of self-described epistaxis severity. The range is 0 to 13. The higher the score worse is epistaxis severity.

Time frame: Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6

Population: Participants with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
BevacizumabChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 1 month-2.27 score on a scale
BevacizumabChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 2 month-2.27 score on a scale
BevacizumabChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 4 month-2.00 score on a scale
BevacizumabChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 6 month-1.34 score on a scale
Saline ControlChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 6 month-0.87 score on a scale
Saline ControlChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 1 month-1.16 score on a scale
Saline ControlChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 4 month-1.16 score on a scale
Saline ControlChange in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)Difference at 2 month-1.01 score on a scale
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 1.p-value: 0.11195% CI: [-2.47, 0.26]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 2.p-value: 0.13195% CI: [-2.9, 0.38]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 4.p-value: 0.33295% CI: [-2.57, 0.88]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 6.p-value: 0.59795% CI: [-2.25, 1.3]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Reduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)

Evaluate the effect of bevacizumab injection on direct and indirect costs in USD associated with care and management of epistaxis as well as productivity lost after treatment. The cost of caring in USD for nasal bleeding was evaluated with two surveys, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, and the HHT Costing Data Sheet.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6

Population: Participants with available data are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BevacizumabReduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)Baseline74 US Dollars
BevacizumabReduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)Month 29 US Dollars
BevacizumabReduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)Month 611 US Dollars
Saline ControlReduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)Baseline16 US Dollars
Saline ControlReduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)Month 211 US Dollars
Saline ControlReduction in Epistaxis-related Costs (Direct and Indirect)Month 60 US Dollars
Comparison: Analysis of intergroup difference at baseline.p-value: 0.03Wilcoxon rank sum test, 2-sided
Comparison: Analysis of intergroup difference at month 2.p-value: 0.719Wilcoxon rank sum test, 2-sided
Comparison: Analysis of intergroup difference at month 6.p-value: 0.467Wilcoxon rank sum test, 2-sided
Secondary

Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score

MCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. MCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.

Time frame: Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6

Population: Participants with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 1 month51.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.91
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 2 month54.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.99
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 4 month51.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.61
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 6 month48.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.97
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 6 month55.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.03
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 1 month54.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.89
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 4 month53.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.84
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreMean at 2 month50.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.68
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 1.p-value: 0.36695% CI: [-8.38, 3.11]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 2p-value: 0.81695% CI: [-6.12, 7.76]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 4.p-value: 0.24795% CI: [-11.61, 3.02]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 6p-value: 0.03595% CI: [-15.76, -0.6]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score

PCS of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. PCS is calculated using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.

Time frame: Baseline and month 1, month 2, month 4, month 6

Population: Participants with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 140.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.78
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 239.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.22
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 439.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
BevacizumabShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 639.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.86
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 638.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.73
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 140.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.79
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 440.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.47
Saline ControlShort Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreMonth 240.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 1.p-value: 0.19195% CI: [-1.44, 7.13]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 2p-value: 0.91495% CI: [-5.02, 5.61]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 4.p-value: 0.59295% CI: [-4.17, 7.28]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis between groups at month 6p-value: 0.3195% CI: [-2.92, 9.12]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026