Skip to content

Feasability of Collaborative Care in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease

Feasability and Effectiveness of a Collaborative Care Intervention in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease - A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02389153
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-03-17
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2018-10-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Heart Disease

Keywords

secondary prevention coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular risk factors, collaborative care, quality of life, patients´ satisfaction with treatment

Brief summary

The main focus of the pilot study is to evaluate the feasability and effectiveness of a collaborative care intervention for patients suffering from a coronary heart disease (CHD) with insufficient controlled health related risk factors in their lifestyle. The design of the study is a wait list control design. 30 patients will receive treatment immediately after submission, the other 30 after 6 months. An interdisciplinary team, including a care manager for each patient, will offer an individualized treatment plan, based on shared decision making for each patient to reduce risk factors and improve quality of life.

Detailed description

The following assumptions will be evaluated: 1. The collaborative care concept is feasable in the context of the german health care system and leads to greater patient satisfaction 2. The team-based intervention leads to a decrease of cardiovascular risk factors of patients in the intervention group compared to participants in the waitlist condition 3. The collaborative care intervention leads to an improvement of quality of life as well as mental well being of participants in the intervention group compared to participants of the waitlist condition

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcollaborative care CHD

Over a time span of 6 months participants receive individualized treatment to reduce risk factors and improve quality of life, based on their preferences following a health plan, which they developed with their health coach.

Sponsors

Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Göttingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* both sexes * coronary heart disease (angiographically oder clinically approved) * sufficient knowledge of the german language * at least one not sufficient controlled risk factor : Diabetes mellitus (HbA1c\>7,5%), smoking, lack of physical activity (less than 60 minutes of light physical exercise per week), heightened stress level (PSS-4 \>5), arterial hypertension (blood pressure despite medication repeatedly heightened \>140/90 or in a 24-hour measurement \>135/85 mmHg), hypercholesteremia (LDL \>130 mg/dl) * written informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

* no existence of an medically approved coronary heart disease * insufficient knowledge of the german language and ulterior disabilities to complete the questionnaires or to understand the education about the Intervention * existence of a psychosis * drug dependency (except tobacco) * dementia * severe episode of Depression * current suicidal tendency * cardiac insufficiency NYHA 4 * missing informed consent * malign tumor (unless curative treated and without relapse) * acute coronary syndrome or cardiosurgery within the last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients´ satisfaction with treatment between baseline and the up to 12 months follow-upup to 12 months follow-upSeptember 2014: baseline for both groups; first 30 participants start with the Intervention, march 2015: 6-months follow-up for intervention group, participants from the wait list group start with active intervention phase, September 2015: 12-months follow-up intervention group; 6-months follow-up participants wait list group, march 2016: 12-months follow-up participants wait list group
Change in composite cardiovascular risk scoreBaseline to six monthsChange in cardiovascular risk factor score comprised of secondary outcomes mentioned below

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lack of physical exerciseBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upLess than 60 minutes of light physical exercise per week
SmokingBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upActual smoking behavior:yes
LDL cholesterolBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upA LDL value of \>130mg/dl or higher
HypertensionBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upA blood pressure value of \>140/90 mmHg or in a 24 hour measurement \>135/85 mmHg
Increased HbA1cBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upA HbA1c value of \>7,5% or higher
Heightened level of stressBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upA value in the PSS-4 \>5 is an indicator for an heigtened stress level

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Social supportBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upSocial Support is measured with the ESSI-D, Cordes et al., 2009
Health-related quality of lifeBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upQuality of life is measured with the SF-12, Radoschewski & Bellach,1999
Fear and depressionBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upFear and Depression is measured with the HADS-D; Herrmann-Lingen, Buss & Snaith, 1995
Physical strainBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upPhysical strain is measured with the 6-minutes walking test
Self-efficacyBaseline and up to 12 months follow-upSelf-efficacy is measured with the GSW-6; Romppel et al., 2006

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026