Skip to content

Blood Flow Within Active Myofascial Trigger Points Following Massage

Blood Flow Within Active Myofascial Trigger Points Following Massage

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02389140
Enrollment
28
Registered
2015-03-17
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2017-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain, Tension-type Headache

Keywords

Blood flow, Glucose, lactic acid

Brief summary

The physiological response at the myofascial trigger point (MTrP) to massage is not known, yet would provide important objective evidence for a treatment effect and clarify the resolution process of a MTrP.

Detailed description

The physiological response at the myofascial trigger point (MTrP) to massage is not known, yet would provide important objective evidence for a treatment effect and clarify the resolution process of a MTrP. The long-term goal is to understand how therapeutic intervention affects the physiology of the MTrP. The objective of the proposed research is to assess, in a placebo controlled trial, the effectiveness of trigger point release massage (also known as ischemic compression) on blood flow at an active MTrP. The central hypothesis is that the contraction nodule of an active MTrP is characterized by an ischemic state comprised of reduced blood flow and subsequent dysregulation in carbohydrate metabolism. The investigators hypothesize that trigger point release (TPR) can positively impact blood flow leading to a change in high energy carbohydrate tension. The present study has been formulated, in part, from a preliminary study conducted by the investigators, which supports reduced blood flow and physiological disruption at active MTrPs. The proposed research will provide a physiological basis for massage to corroborate subjective reports of reduced pain sensitivity, impart credibility to treatment techniques, and provide insight into a mechanism of action for healing the MTrP.

Interventions

Trigger point therapy

OTHERUltrasound

sham ultrasound

Sponsors

University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic or episodic tension-type headache * active MTrP in upper trapezius * age 21-49 * BMI between 18.5-24.9 * either gender * any race or ethnicity

Exclusion criteria

* No or latent MTrP in the upper trapezius * migraine 4+/month * cluster headache * fibromyalgia * neurological disease (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis) * cardiovascular disease (e.g. prior heart attack or stroke) * diabetes * pregnancy * a bleeding disorder (Self-report of hemophilia, known lack/deficiency of clotting factors, or presently °taking anti-coagulants (e.g. warfarin, Coumadin)) * narcotic use * currently receiving massage * prior trigger point injection or needling therapies * allergy to lidocaine-type anesthetics such as lidocaine and prilocaine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Blood Flow as measured by microdialysis1 hr pre intervention and 1 hr post intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Glucose as measured by microdialysis1 hr pre intervention and 1 hr post intervention
Change in Lactate as measured by microdialysis1 hr pre intervention and 1 hr post intervention
Change in Pyruvate as measured by microdialysis1 hr pre intervention and 1 hr post intervention

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026