Skip to content

Saphenous Nerve Block for Foot and Ankle Surgery

A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Ultrasound-Guided With Nerve Stimulation Saphenous Nerve Blockade Utilizing the Transsartorial Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02382744
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-03-09
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2018-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Saphenous Nerve Block

Keywords

Saphenous Nerve, Nerve Block, Ultrasound guided, Neurostimulation, Regional Anesthesia, Ropivacaine, Foot Surgery, Nerve Stimulation, Ankle Surgery

Brief summary

Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery have the option of having a nerve block administered by their Anesthesiologist. The nerve block numbs the foot and results in less post-operative nausea and vomiting, and better pain control. Two different techniques for blocking the saphenous nerve to the foot have been described and are both commonly used at St. Paul's hospital. The goal of this study is to compare the success rates of these two techniques.

Detailed description

Purpose / Hypothesis This clinical study is a prospective, controlled, randomized, single-blinded trial designed to investigate the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided blockade of the saphenous nerve in conjunction with nerve stimulation has a higher success rate when compared to ultrasound alone. These research interventions represent what is considered to be an improvement on the standard practice at St. Paul's, which is to block the saphenous nerve with one of any number of saphenous nerve blocks, using a number of different techniques (i.e. ultrasound-guided, nerve stimulation, blind field block); the effectiveness of which has been inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to identify if one technique has a great success rate over another, which would ultimately result in increased success rates of saphenous nerve blocks and patient care. Study Design The study will be a randomized, single-blinded trial of 80 subjects who are undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Informed consent will be obtained from all study subjects. Subjects will be randomized to one of two saphenous nerve block techniques to be administered by an experienced regional anesthesiologist at St. Paul's Hospital. Once the nerve block is completed the success will be evaluated by an investigator blinded to the procedure. Once the 30min evaluation is completed anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The subject will then be contacted at 2 and 7 days after block administration to assess for delayed complications. Intravenous access will be gained and non-invasive blood pressure measurements will be recorded every five minutes. Continuous electrocardiography and oxygen saturation monitoring will be maintained throughout the procedure and for at least 60 minutes afterwards. Light sedation will be provided, with the goal of maintaining verbal contact with the subject throughout the procedure. Where clinically appropriate, the study block may be preceded by an ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Saphenous nerve blockade will be preformed using a transsartorial approach. Subjects in both groups will be positioned prone. The ultrasound probe will be placed in the transverse plane on the medial aspect of the thigh 3-5cm cephalad to the superior border of the patella (area marked). An attempt will then be made to identify the saphenous nerve, which runs deep to the sartorius muscle within the subsartorial fascial plane. The nerve will appear hyperechoic, round or oval shaped. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum scan time of 3 minutes prior to needle entry. Up to 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine will be used for skin infiltration of the injection site. The block will then be preformed as to the protocols below depending on group allocation. A thirty minute evaluation of the saphenous nerve block will occur during the normal monitoring period after the placement of a block. Following completion of the thirty-minute evaluation, anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. This may include spinal or general anesthesia. All subjects will be contacted by telephone at two and seven days post procedure for a follow up interview to assess for delayed complications associated with the procedure. The medications used for the nerve blocks in the study will include only ropivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1%. For subject sedation, midazolam and fentanyl will be used. None of these medications are considered study drugs; rather they are commonly used anesthetic medications. While used in the study, these drugs themselves are not being investigated. The same medications will be used on subjects not enrolled in the study. Study Treatment Group 1 - Saphenous nerve block using ultrasound guidance The needle will be placed with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structures (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial facial plane of the sartorius muscle if the nerve is not visible). A total of 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be used for the block. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block. Study Treatment Group 2 - Saphenous nerve blockade using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation The needle will be place with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structure (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial fascial plane if the nerve is not visible). The Pajunk MultiStim SENSOR nerve stimulator will then be turned on, starting at 1.0 milliamp (mA) until a tapping sensation is elicited in the medial or anterior aspect of the ankle. The amplitude of the nerve stimulator will then be gradually decreased with maintenance of the tapping sensation by making small adjustments in needle location. The end-point for nerve localization will be a tapping sensation in the area of the medial malleolus at ≤ 0.6 mA. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum search time of 5 minutes from needle entry to elicitation of the tapping sensation. Once a tapping sensation is elicited in the ≤ 0.6 mA range, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site. If a tapping sensation is elicited but not ≤ 0.6 mA within 5 minutes then 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site where the lowest amplitude tapping sensation was elicited. If no tapping sensation is elicited from the subject after 5 minutes, an injection of 10 mL of ropivacaine will be made below the Sartorius muscle in the subsartorial fascial plane. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block.

Interventions

Ultrasound guidance will be used to place a saphenous nerve block

DEVICEUltrasound guidance + nerve stimulation

Ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation will be used to place a saphenous nerve block

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects undergoing foot and ankle surgery 2. Aged 19-80 3. Normal sensation in saphenous nerve distribution in both legs 4. Provided written informed consent. 5. Body Mass Index \<38 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject refusal 2. A known history of allergy, sensitivity or any other form of reaction to local anesthetics of amide type 3. Suspected inability to comply with study procedures, including language difficulties or medical history and/or concomitant disease (i.e. skin infection as the site of needle insertion), as judged by the investigator. Reason for exclusion will be recorded. 4. A neurological and/or vascular condition, which may preclude eligibility for peripheral nerve blockade (i.e. peripheral neuropathy) as judged by the investigator. Reason for exclusion will be recorded. 5. Subjects on therapeutic anticoagulation or coagulopathy at the time of nerve blockade. 6. Previous inclusion in this study. 7. Participation in other clinical studies during this study or in the 14 days prior to admission to this study. 8. Surgeon refusal (e.g. the surgeon does not want a nerve block for the subject). Reason for exclusion will be recorded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Block Success30 minutes post nerve blockComplete absence of sensation to pinprick at two different anatomic areas of the saphenous nerve at thirty minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Any Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation)30 minParticipants with any evidence of blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial tibial condyle)
Incomplete Block Rate30 minutes post nerve blockincomplete \[decreased only\] loss of sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes at both areas of assessment
Speed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade)30 minutes post nerve blockMedian (Kaplan-Meier curve survival) time required to reach complete absence of sensation to pinprick at the two different anatomic areas of assessment in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial condyle of the tibia).
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation5 minutessuccessful elicitation of any tapping sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution within the 5 min stimulation time limit
Block Failure Rate30 minutes post nerve blockPersistent sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes (i.e., absence of any evidence of blockade \[decreased or complete absence of sensation\] at both areas: normal sensation.
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation at < 0.6 Milliampere (mA)5 minutesSuccessful elicitation of tapping sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at ≤ 0.6 mA
Time Required to Administer Block10 minutesThe time required for the block to be completed (from scanning to removal of needle)
Immediate Complications60 minutes post block completionAny complications as a result of block placement (e.g. local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, pain etc.)
Delayed Complications7 days post operativeAny complication as a results of nerve block placement (e.g. persistent paresthesia, nerve injury)
Mean Minimum Stimulation Current5 minutesthe mean minimum stimulation current magnitude to elicit tapping sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution (cf. 3.2.3 below)

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ultrasound Guidance
Saphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance alone Ultrasound Guidance: Ultrasound guidance will be used to place a saphenous nerve block
40
Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation
Saphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation Ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation: Ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation will be used to place a saphenous nerve block
40
Total80

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUltrasound GuidanceUltrasound Guidance and Nerve StimulationTotal
Age, Continuous50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status
III to V
3 participants7 participants10 participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status
I or II
37 participants33 participants70 participants
Body Mass Index26 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
25 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
25 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants29 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants11 Participants29 Participants
Type of surgery
Amputation
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Type of surgery
Arthroscopy/debridement
7 participants7 participants14 participants
Type of surgery
Foot/ankle joint reconstruction/fusion/arthrodesis
15 participants24 participants39 participants
Type of surgery
Fracture fixation
5 participants3 participants8 participants
Type of surgery
Mass/hardware removal
9 participants3 participants12 participants
Type of surgery
Tendon repair/transfer
4 participants2 participants6 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 402 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Block Success

Complete absence of sensation to pinprick at two different anatomic areas of the saphenous nerve at thirty minutes

Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceBlock Success18 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationBlock Success22 participants
Comparison: We sought to detect an increase in the rate of complete absence of sensation to pinprick 30 min following ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous nerve blockade to 90% from an assumed baseline of 64% as extrapolated from our previous study (cf. Head SJ et al. 2015) at β = 0.2. The required minimum sample size at α = 0.05 (one-sided) was 30 patients in each group. To be conservative, we aimed to enroll a total of 80 patients.p-value: 0.2595% CI: [-11.9, 31.9]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Any Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation)

Participants with any evidence of blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial tibial condyle)

Time frame: 30 min

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceAny Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation)39 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationAny Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation)37 participants
p-value: 0.62Fisher Exact
Secondary

Block Failure Rate

Persistent sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes (i.e., absence of any evidence of blockade \[decreased or complete absence of sensation\] at both areas: normal sensation.

Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceBlock Failure RateNormal sensation1 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceBlock Failure RateDecreased or no sensation39 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationBlock Failure RateNormal sensation3 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationBlock Failure RateDecreased or no sensation37 participants
Comparison: This contingency-table type analysis (Fisher Exact test) compares the two groups, Ultrasound Guidance and Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation, as far as the two categorical outcomes are concerned, block failure at 30 minutes post nerve block versus no block failure at 30 minutes post nerve block.p-value: 0.62Fisher Exact
Secondary

Delayed Complications

Any complication as a results of nerve block placement (e.g. persistent paresthesia, nerve injury)

Time frame: 7 days post operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceDelayed ComplicationsParesthesia0 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceDelayed ComplicationsOther0 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationDelayed ComplicationsParesthesia1 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationDelayed ComplicationsOther0 participants
Secondary

Immediate Complications

Any complications as a result of block placement (e.g. local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, pain etc.)

Time frame: 60 minutes post block completion

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceImmediate ComplicationsPain on needle manipulation1 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceImmediate ComplicationsPositive aspiration (of blood)0 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceImmediate ComplicationsHematoma0 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceImmediate ComplicationsPruritus of the blocked leg in saph. n. distrib.1 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceImmediate ComplicationsParesthesia3 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceImmediate ComplicationsTransient increase in pain in medial malleolus1 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceImmediate ComplicationsLocal anesthetic systemic toxicity0 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationImmediate ComplicationsTransient increase in pain in medial malleolus0 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationImmediate ComplicationsLocal anesthetic systemic toxicity0 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationImmediate ComplicationsHematoma0 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationImmediate ComplicationsPain on needle manipulation0 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationImmediate ComplicationsParesthesia2 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationImmediate ComplicationsPositive aspiration (of blood)1 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationImmediate ComplicationsPruritus of the blocked leg in saph. n. distrib.0 participants
Secondary

Incomplete Block Rate

incomplete \[decreased only\] loss of sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes at both areas of assessment

Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceIncomplete Block RateDecreased sensation21 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceIncomplete Block RateNormal or no sensation19 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationIncomplete Block RateDecreased sensation15 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationIncomplete Block RateNormal or no sensation25 participants
Comparison: This contingency-table type analysis (Fisher Exact test) compares the two groups, Ultrasound Guidance and Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation, as far as the two categorical outcomes are concerned, incomplete block at 30 minutes post nerve block versus no incomplete block at 30 minutes post nerve block.p-value: 0.26Fisher Exact
Secondary

Mean Minimum Stimulation Current

the mean minimum stimulation current magnitude to elicit tapping sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution (cf. 3.2.3 below)

Time frame: 5 minutes

Population: Participants in the Ultrasound Guidance and nerve stimulation group with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Ultrasound GuidanceMean Minimum Stimulation Current0.39 mA
Secondary

Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation

successful elicitation of any tapping sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution within the 5 min stimulation time limit

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceRate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation32 participants
Secondary

Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation at < 0.6 Milliampere (mA)

Successful elicitation of tapping sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at ≤ 0.6 mA

Time frame: 5 minutes

Population: Participants in the Ultrasound Guidance and nerve stimulation group with successful stimulation and available current magnitude data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceRate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation at < 0.6 Milliampere (mA)25 participants
Secondary

Speed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade)

Median (Kaplan-Meier curve survival) time required to reach complete absence of sensation to pinprick at the two different anatomic areas of assessment in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial condyle of the tibia).

Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block

Population: Participants with complete absence of sensation to pinprick at the two different anatomic areas of assessment in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial condyle of the tibia)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ultrasound GuidanceSpeed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade)25.0 Minutes
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSpeed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade)17.5 Minutes
Comparison: To assess speed of onset, sensation to pinprick in the distribution of the saphenous nerve was assessed for each patient every 5 min until complete sensory loss was noted, or until 30 min had elapsed. To compare the two groups in speed of onset on the basis of these data, we constructed Kaplan-Meyer survival curves for the times to onset of sensory blockade and compared the underlying time-to-event data with the log-rank test.p-value: 0.1295% CI: [0.38, 1.31]Log Rank
Secondary

Time Required to Administer Block

The time required for the block to be completed (from scanning to removal of needle)

Time frame: 10 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrasound GuidanceTime Required to Administer Block207 sStandard Deviation 76
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationTime Required to Administer Block314 sStandard Deviation 125
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [61, 153]t-test, 2 sided
Post Hoc

Response Versus Lack of Response to Nerve Stimulation and Block Failure Rate

Percentage of block failure (persistent sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes -- i.e., absence of any evidence of blockade \[decreased or complete absence of sensation\] at both areas: normal sensation) among participants in the Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation group with response versus no response to nerve stimulation

Time frame: 30 min

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceResponse Versus Lack of Response to Nerve Stimulation and Block Failure RateBlock failure (normal sensation)0 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceResponse Versus Lack of Response to Nerve Stimulation and Block Failure RateNo block failure (decreased or no sensation)32 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationResponse Versus Lack of Response to Nerve Stimulation and Block Failure RateBlock failure (normal sensation)3 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationResponse Versus Lack of Response to Nerve Stimulation and Block Failure RateNo block failure (decreased or no sensation)5 participants
Comparison: This contingency-table type analysis (Fisher Exact test) compares the two arms, Patients with response to nerve stimulation and Patients with lack response to nerve stimulation, as far as the two categorical outcomes are concerned, block failure at 30 minutes post nerve block versus no block failure at 30 minutes post nerve block.p-value: 0.0057Fisher Exact
Post Hoc

Sensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Malleolus

Sensation to pinprick with an 18 gauge blunt needle was assessed individually at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve: Here, the results are reported for the area 2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus only

Time frame: 30 min

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Malleolus2 = absent sensation24 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Malleolus1 = decreased sensation14 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Malleolus0 = normal sensation (no block)2 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Malleolus2 = absent sensation31 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Malleolus1 = decreased sensation5 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Malleolus0 = normal sensation (no block)4 participants
Post Hoc

Sensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Tibial Condyle

Sensation to pinprick with an 18 gauge blunt needle was assessed individually at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve: Here, the results are reported for the area 10 cm distal to the medial tibial condyle only

Time frame: 30 min

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ultrasound GuidanceSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Tibial Condyle2 = absent sensation21 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Tibial Condyle1 = decreased sensation17 participants
Ultrasound GuidanceSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Tibial Condyle0 = normal sensation (no block)2 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Tibial Condyle2 = absent sensation23 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Tibial Condyle1 = decreased sensation14 participants
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSensory Blockade Scores by Individual Assessment Area: Medial Tibial Condyle0 = normal sensation (no block)3 participants
Post Hoc

Speed of Onset for Any Blockade in the Area 2 cm Proximal to the Medial Malleolus Only

Median (Kaplan-Meier curve survival) time required to reach any evidence of sensory blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) in the area 2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus only

Time frame: 30 min

Population: Participants with any evidence of sensory blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) in the area 2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus only

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ultrasound GuidanceSpeed of Onset for Any Blockade in the Area 2 cm Proximal to the Medial Malleolus Only30.0 Minutes
Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve StimulationSpeed of Onset for Any Blockade in the Area 2 cm Proximal to the Medial Malleolus Only17.5 Minutes
p-value: 0.0295% CI: [0.37, 0.93]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026