Skip to content

Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02381951
Acronym
STIMUPARK
Enrollment
5
Registered
2015-03-06
Start date
2015-11-24
Completion date
2017-04-25
Last updated
2026-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Brief summary

Parkinson's disease affects between 100'000 and 150'000 people in France. Drug therapy (L-Dopa and other drugs) is effective to improve motor symptoms but after an initial 'honeymoon period' lasting a few years, motor symptoms reoccur in most patients, impairing gait and walking. Spinal cord stimulation is currently an important therapeutic option in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Experimental and limited clinical data suggest that this technique might also be used to alleviate motor symptoms and improve walking in Parkinsons patients. This exploratory study aims at measuring the benefits of spinal cord stimulation on the walking capacity of a small number of Parkinsons patients who are not adequately improved by drug therapy alone.

Interventions

DEVICEspinal cord stimulation (St Jude Medical)

implantation of a spinal cord neurostimulation system : St Jude Medical Octrode 3183 (R) peridural lead connected to a St Jude Medical EonC (R) primary cell IPG

Sponsors

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Idiopathic Parkinson's disease since more than 5 years * Walking disorder with freezing episodes, insufficiently alleviated by oral dopaminergic therapy and/or physiotherapy

Exclusion criteria

* Atypical Parkinson-like syndrome (e.g. progressive supranuclear palsy) * Cognitive impairment (MMSE\<24) * Psychiatric disease * Contraindication of surgery * Neuropathic pain in the lower limb or lumbar region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
improvement in walking capacity2 monthsstand-walk-sit test : time to complete the test : difference between scores pre-implantation and 2 month post-implantation of stimulator

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
freezing episodes : reduction of frequency2 monthsstand-walk-sit test : total number of freezing episodes during the test : difference between scores pre-implantation and 2 month post-implantation of stimulator
freezing episodes : reduction of cumulated time2 monthsstand-walk-sit test : cumulated time of freezing episodes during the test : difference between scores pre-implantation and 2 month post-implantation of stimulator
improvement in motor score of MultiDimentionalScaling-UPDRS scale2 monthspercentage of improvement in the motor score (part III of scale) of MultiDimentionalScaling-UPDRS scale, between score pre-implantation and score 2 months post-implantation of stimulator
improvement in freezing of gait score2 monthspercentage of improvement in the freezing of gate score, between score pre-implantation and score 2 months post-implantation of stimulator
improvement in quality of life score2 monthsimprovement in PDQ 39 quality of life score between pre-implantation visit and 2 months post-implantation of stimulator

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026